The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Thomas: SEC limits greenhouse gas reporting to Scope 1 and 2
“And then also greenhouse gas emission reporting, and that's just scope one and scope two reporting, and doesn't include all public companies. It's just large accelerated filers and accelerated filers That have to report their scope one and two.”
Thomas: California climate mandates require long-term Scope 3 emissions reporting
“So with California, California has scope three in the long-term range of reporting as required.”
Thomas: New York and Illinois propose climate rules nearly identical to California
“We're seeing other states propose, it's almost word for word, similar to California. So in New York, Illinois”
Thomas: SEC rules mandate disclosing carbon offsets used for stated climate goals
“Well, there, I mean, there are disclosure requirements for racks and offsets within the SEC disclosure. So the final rule does include disclosing that if it's a part of how you're planning to obtain, or you have goals and targets, how you're going to get there…”
Thomas: SEC removed requirement to identify board members with climate expertise
“The one thing I think interesting that was removed but makes sense is some of the identification of board members with the climate risk background. Like, talking about and identifying if there's someone on your board who has this expertise.”