The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Visioni: Decades of literature showed shipping emissions brightened ocean clouds
“There was a very strong suggestion in the literature for decades about the fact that shipping, ah, was making clouds brighter. Burning from shipping was making clouds brighter, especially over the North Atlantic and in general over the oceans.”
Visioni: North Atlantic clouds were the perfect target for aerosol brightening
“The ones in the North Atlantic, the clouds in the North Atlantic, tended to be the perfect target where these aerosols would reduce the size, and there were a lot of them. There were a lot of shipping tracks.”
Visioni: Mount Pinatubo injected 10 to 20 megatons of stratospheric sulfate
“Pinatubo happened in 1991. It released anywhere between 10 and 20 teragrams. That's megatons. So that's a million of tons of sulfate in the stratosphere. We called that a big number, but it just released it once, and it had an effect for a couple of years, and…”
Visioni: Global bodies like White House and UN published geoengineering reports
“In the last year, there's been a lot of advances in bringing the conversation around geoengineering to a more global public, right? There's been plenty of reports from very influential places. The White House has had a report, the OSTP, the Office of Science, …”