Sep 18, 2025 · 42m · catalyst

Is now the time for DERs to scale?

Andy Lubershane · 26m spoken Shayle Kann · 8m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Shail Khan and Energy Impact Partners' head of research Andy Lubershain analyze why distributed energy resources and virtual power plants are now positioned to scale rapidly to resolve severe modern grid capacity bottlenecks after a decade of unmet market hype.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Shayle holds 22% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Shayle as informed peer 6.0 Guest teaching 5.0 Guest disagreement 1.2 Shayle pushing back 2.8
05100:0015:0030:002:14–10:16 · Shayle as informed peer 6/10 Reassessing Historical Hype and the Utility Death Spiral Kann sets the stage with deep historical context around the 2014 utility death spiral narrative and prompts Lubershain to break down his DER taxonomy. The exchange is highly collegial, with Kann interjecting to clarify that dispatchable capacity DERs are constrained by duration limits.10:17–20:29 · Shayle as informed peer 6/10 Analyzing Past Market Failures: Low Need and High Soft Costs Lubershain recounts his 2017 experience with utility engineers finding zero non-wires alternatives due to flat load growth. Kann frames this with the venture capital trope of selling vitamins versus painkillers, which Lubershain readily adopts and extends with an FDA approval analogy.20:32–32:06 · Shayle as informed peer 7/10 Mid-Roll Sponsorship Break: Bloom Energy, Engie, and EnergyHub Following the mid-roll ad read, Kann plays devil's advocate against Lubershain's core thesis, arguing that comparative capacity costs are already favorable but regulatory inertia and utility friction remain massive bottlenecks. Lubershain concedes his economist bias toward rationality and points to surging Voltus dispatch data.32:07–35:49 · Shayle as informed peer 5/10 Differentiating Expanded Demand Response from Virtual Power Plants Kann asks Lubershain to delineate the practical distinction between legacy demand response and modern virtual power plants. Lubershain provides an educational breakdown of how automation and sophisticated asset aggregation differentiate the two paradigms.35:49–41:11 · Shayle as informed peer 6/10 Projecting the Five-Year Outlook: Bull vs. Bear Scenarios Kann prompts Lubershain to outline the five-year bull and bear scenarios for DER deployment, interjecting with potential hurdles like fire codes. Lubershain explains the risk of utility planners sticking to 100% centralized solutions rather than probabilistic distributed assets.2:14–10:16 · Guest teaching 5/10 Reassessing Historical Hype and the Utility Death Spiral Kann sets the stage with deep historical context around the 2014 utility death spiral narrative and prompts Lubershain to break down his DER taxonomy. The exchange is highly collegial, with Kann interjecting to clarify that dispatchable capacity DERs are constrained by duration limits.10:17–20:29 · Guest teaching 5/10 Analyzing Past Market Failures: Low Need and High Soft Costs Lubershain recounts his 2017 experience with utility engineers finding zero non-wires alternatives due to flat load growth. Kann frames this with the venture capital trope of selling vitamins versus painkillers, which Lubershain readily adopts and extends with an FDA approval analogy.20:32–32:06 · Guest teaching 4/10 Mid-Roll Sponsorship Break: Bloom Energy, Engie, and EnergyHub Following the mid-roll ad read, Kann plays devil's advocate against Lubershain's core thesis, arguing that comparative capacity costs are already favorable but regulatory inertia and utility friction remain massive bottlenecks. Lubershain concedes his economist bias toward rationality and points to surging Voltus dispatch data.32:07–35:49 · Guest teaching 6/10 Differentiating Expanded Demand Response from Virtual Power Plants Kann asks Lubershain to delineate the practical distinction between legacy demand response and modern virtual power plants. Lubershain provides an educational breakdown of how automation and sophisticated asset aggregation differentiate the two paradigms.35:49–41:11 · Guest teaching 5/10 Projecting the Five-Year Outlook: Bull vs. Bear Scenarios Kann prompts Lubershain to outline the five-year bull and bear scenarios for DER deployment, interjecting with potential hurdles like fire codes. Lubershain explains the risk of utility planners sticking to 100% centralized solutions rather than probabilistic distributed assets.2:14–10:16 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Reassessing Historical Hype and the Utility Death Spiral Kann sets the stage with deep historical context around the 2014 utility death spiral narrative and prompts Lubershain to break down his DER taxonomy. The exchange is highly collegial, with Kann interjecting to clarify that dispatchable capacity DERs are constrained by duration limits.10:17–20:29 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Analyzing Past Market Failures: Low Need and High Soft Costs Lubershain recounts his 2017 experience with utility engineers finding zero non-wires alternatives due to flat load growth. Kann frames this with the venture capital trope of selling vitamins versus painkillers, which Lubershain readily adopts and extends with an FDA approval analogy.20:32–32:06 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Mid-Roll Sponsorship Break: Bloom Energy, Engie, and EnergyHub Following the mid-roll ad read, Kann plays devil's advocate against Lubershain's core thesis, arguing that comparative capacity costs are already favorable but regulatory inertia and utility friction remain massive bottlenecks. Lubershain concedes his economist bias toward rationality and points to surging Voltus dispatch data.32:07–35:49 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Differentiating Expanded Demand Response from Virtual Power Plants Kann asks Lubershain to delineate the practical distinction between legacy demand response and modern virtual power plants. Lubershain provides an educational breakdown of how automation and sophisticated asset aggregation differentiate the two paradigms.35:49–41:11 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Projecting the Five-Year Outlook: Bull vs. Bear Scenarios Kann prompts Lubershain to outline the five-year bull and bear scenarios for DER deployment, interjecting with potential hurdles like fire codes. Lubershain explains the risk of utility planners sticking to 100% centralized solutions rather than probabilistic distributed assets.2:14–10:16 · Shayle pushing back 2/10 Reassessing Historical Hype and the Utility Death Spiral Kann sets the stage with deep historical context around the 2014 utility death spiral narrative and prompts Lubershain to break down his DER taxonomy. The exchange is highly collegial, with Kann interjecting to clarify that dispatchable capacity DERs are constrained by duration limits.10:17–20:29 · Shayle pushing back 2/10 Analyzing Past Market Failures: Low Need and High Soft Costs Lubershain recounts his 2017 experience with utility engineers finding zero non-wires alternatives due to flat load growth. Kann frames this with the venture capital trope of selling vitamins versus painkillers, which Lubershain readily adopts and extends with an FDA approval analogy.20:32–32:06 · Shayle pushing back 6/10 Mid-Roll Sponsorship Break: Bloom Energy, Engie, and EnergyHub Following the mid-roll ad read, Kann plays devil's advocate against Lubershain's core thesis, arguing that comparative capacity costs are already favorable but regulatory inertia and utility friction remain massive bottlenecks. Lubershain concedes his economist bias toward rationality and points to surging Voltus dispatch data.32:07–35:49 · Shayle pushing back 2/10 Differentiating Expanded Demand Response from Virtual Power Plants Kann asks Lubershain to delineate the practical distinction between legacy demand response and modern virtual power plants. Lubershain provides an educational breakdown of how automation and sophisticated asset aggregation differentiate the two paradigms.35:49–41:11 · Shayle pushing back 2/10 Projecting the Five-Year Outlook: Bull vs. Bear Scenarios Kann prompts Lubershain to outline the five-year bull and bear scenarios for DER deployment, interjecting with potential hurdles like fire codes. Lubershain explains the risk of utility planners sticking to 100% centralized solutions rather than probabilistic distributed assets.

speaking balance: gold is Shayle, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Shayle 32.1% · guest 67.9%0:00 · Shayle 32.1% · guest 67.9%3:00 · Shayle 44.4% · guest 55.6%3:00 · Shayle 44.4% · guest 55.6%6:00 · Shayle 7.6% · guest 92.4%6:00 · Shayle 7.6% · guest 92.4%9:00 · Shayle 23.5% · guest 76.5%9:00 · Shayle 23.5% · guest 76.5%12:00 · Shayle 11.7% · guest 88.3%12:00 · Shayle 11.7% · guest 88.3%15:00 · Shayle 25.6% · guest 74.4%15:00 · Shayle 25.6% · guest 74.4%18:00 · Shayle 0% · guest 100%18:00 · Shayle 0% · guest 100%21:00 · Shayle 22.9% · guest 77.1%21:00 · Shayle 22.9% · guest 77.1%24:00 · Shayle 42.5% · guest 57.5%24:00 · Shayle 42.5% · guest 57.5%27:00 · Shayle 29.7% · guest 70.3%27:00 · Shayle 29.7% · guest 70.3%30:00 · Shayle 23.8% · guest 76.2%30:00 · Shayle 23.8% · guest 76.2%33:00 · Shayle 10.3% · guest 89.7%33:00 · Shayle 10.3% · guest 89.7%36:00 · Shayle 16.3% · guest 83.7%36:00 · Shayle 16.3% · guest 83.7%39:00 · Shayle 18.2% · guest 81.8%39:00 · Shayle 18.2% · guest 81.8%42:00 · Shayle 0% · guest 0%42:00 · Shayle 0% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 27:53 Lubershain acknowledges economic bias against friction

In a very collegial discussion, Lubershain pushes back gently on Kann's skepticism by acknowledging his own economist training while asserting that macro grid desperation will overpower institutional friction.

Hardest push from Shayle ▶ 25:43 Kann plays devil's advocate on regulatory inertia

Kann explicitly challenges the guest's optimistic thesis, arguing that grid need alone does not guarantee DER adoption when state regulations and utility procurement cycles move at a glacial pace.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 4:22 Lubershain details the dispatchable vs passive DER taxonomy

Lubershain methodically educates listeners and the host on why grid planners value solar and efficiency whereas real-time operators require on-off dispatchable capacity.

Shayle holds their own ▶ 25:43 Kann reframes DER economics around rising alternative costs

Kann demonstrates expert market knowledge by redirecting the discussion away from DER hardware costs toward the rapidly increasing cost of comparative capacity like natural gas turbines.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicShayle as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementShayle pushing backWhy
Reassessing Historical Hype and the Utility Death Spiral 6512 Kann sets the stage with deep historical context around the 2014 utility death spiral narrative and prompts Lubershain to break down his DER taxonomy. The exchange is highly collegial, with Kann interjecting to clarify that dispatchable capacity DERs are constrained by duration limits.
Analyzing Past Market Failures: Low Need and High Soft Costs 6512 Lubershain recounts his 2017 experience with utility engineers finding zero non-wires alternatives due to flat load growth. Kann frames this with the venture capital trope of selling vitamins versus painkillers, which Lubershain readily adopts and extends with an FDA approval analogy.
Mid-Roll Sponsorship Break: Bloom Energy, Engie, and EnergyHub 7426 Following the mid-roll ad read, Kann plays devil's advocate against Lubershain's core thesis, arguing that comparative capacity costs are already favorable but regulatory inertia and utility friction remain massive bottlenecks. Lubershain concedes his economist bias toward rationality and points to surging Voltus dispatch data.
Differentiating Expanded Demand Response from Virtual Power Plants 5612 Kann asks Lubershain to delineate the practical distinction between legacy demand response and modern virtual power plants. Lubershain provides an educational breakdown of how automation and sophisticated asset aggregation differentiate the two paradigms.
Projecting the Five-Year Outlook: Bull vs. Bear Scenarios 6512 Kann prompts Lubershain to outline the five-year bull and bear scenarios for DER deployment, interjecting with potential hurdles like fire codes. Lubershain explains the risk of utility planners sticking to 100% centralized solutions rather than probabilistic distributed assets.

Statements from this episode (10)

Assertion Supported
Kann: The decade's predicted utility death spiral completely failed to materialize
“Surprise, surprise, it didn't happen, and I don't actually even think that is really worth talking about now, because it's definitely not happening these days, but the backdrop to that line of thinking was the concept that we were going to see this wave of dis…”
Shayle Kann Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 2:42
Opinion
Lubershain: Distributed natural gas gensets are near-perfect resources for grid operators
“The closest thing to a perfect resource from the perspective of a grid operator is, you know, a flexible, you distributed genset of some sort that can turn on and off really quickly, can ramp, ramp up and ramp down very quickly. And ideally, if it's a natural …”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 6:23
Assertion Supported
Lubershain: Flat power grid load growth suppressed DER adoption for 15-20 years
“The past 1520 years in the power system, we just haven't seen, till very recently, much load growth. So there just weren't that many places on the grid where there was tremendous amount of pressure to upgrade things quickly. It wasn't all that expensive to mak…”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 13:38
Assertion Supported
Lubershain: DER soft costs remained stubborn despite plummeting battery hardware prices
“What we didn't get right was that the soft costs of deploying DERs would not fall, and that's largely the cost of customer acquisition. It's like getting people, getting customers, whether they're homeowners or businesses, to sign up, to put something on their…”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 19:03
Assertion Supported
Lubershain: Operational VPPs Are Now Dispatched at Hundreds of Megawatts
“There are real VPPs now. Hundreds of megawatts in scale that are being dispatched to actually make a difference on the grid in some places.”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 25:17
Assertion Supported
Lubershain: Grid Dispatches of Voltus Demand Response Are Surging Exponentially
“So not, not the resources they have signed up to turn down when someone calls on them, but the number of times they actually do. And That, in the last two years, has been kind of, ah, escalating off the charts. I mean, it seems to be going exponential, ah, in …”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 29:37
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lubershain: Every major utility could deploy hundreds of megawatts of DERs soon
“Could every utility, every major utility in the country within five years have a several hundred megawatt DER program, instead of it just being a few that have a several hundred megawatt DER program? And in a few places where, where you're, you know, have a li…”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 30:37
Insight
Lubershain: DERs can scale to hundreds of megawatts faster than centralized resources
“That's one of the advantages of many classes of distributed energy resources, you know, whether it's a natural gas genset or whether it's a residential battery, you know, you can go out there and put a bunch of them out there very rapidly, and that can scale u…”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 36:25
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lubershain: Cost-effective battery systems will rely on Chinese cells for longer
“Not, not the cells, right? Those have gotten really cheap, but the full systems need to get cheaper if they're going to be really cost-effective resources. That probably means some portion of the battery, like the cells, at least for a while longer, is coming …”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 39:16
Insight
Lubershain: Utility planners stick to 100% solutions because nobody gets fired
“Because utility planners, they are inherently always going to prefer a 100% solution. That's how we've built the grid in the past, and Nobody gets fired for putting in place a 100% solution that is going to work every day for all of the hours of the day, all t…”
Andy Lubershane Sep 18, 2025 ▶ 39:45
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.