Paul Johnson

2 appearances on the record.

computed by AI from the episodes · how this works → · full disclaimer →

13statements → 1claims → 0claims resolved → 3.92/5average certainty → 2.08/5average debate potential → ≈4.5/5argument clarity, estimated → 1said about them ↓

1 not checkable as stated how the 1 claim stands · each chip opens the sources

1 assertion · 2 opinions · 9 insights · 1 disclosure · every statement was checked. The predictions and assertion are the 1 claim: statements the public record can support or contradict. 0 are resolved, and 1 names no date, number or outcome precise enough to check. Everything else (opinions, insights, what ifs, disclosures) can never be settled by the record, so it carries no assessment.

The record, in short

What the tape says about how Paul argues and how the claims held up. Everything they said, and everything said about them, is in the tabs below.

How they sound: not measured why? →

We measure speaking style by listening to the audio itself, and a fair number needs at least 2,000 words from one person on tape we have measured. There is too little of Paul Johnson on measured tape to publish a rate. This says nothing about how they speak.

Everything Paul Johnson said on Capital Allocators that made the record, most notable first. Filter by type, assessment or year in the ledger →

Insight
Johnson: Markets Form Robust Consensus With Few Smart Participants
“The sad part about wisdom of the crowds is, we figured it out, is you don't need as many people as you think to get a wise crowd. You think you'd have to have all these really smart, sophisticated people. Ends up, you don't. The robust, we call it a robust con…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 24:45 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: Engineers Make Terrible Investors When Ignoring Crowd Psychology
“Some of my former friends that are engineers make terrible investors. Not all engineers make, but my friends that were former engineers, because they kept thinking it's an engineering problem. I said, no, it's a, I mean, it is potentially an engineering proble…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 52:32 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Opinion
Johnson: External red teams are too time-prohibitive for daily investment decisions
“And the problem with red teams, particularly in the investment businesses, since we're making decisions almost daily or certainly fairly frequently, having a red team coming in and prepping them is probably prohibitive in terms of time and energy.”
Paul Johnson Sep 23, 2019 ▶ 43:56 Gary Klein with Paul Sonkin and Paul Johnson – Conducting Pre-Mortem Analysis (Capital Allocators, EP.109)
Insight
Paul Johnson: Investment research is useless unless pitched effectively to scale positions
“And now I'm a complete convert, which is that unless you can pitch this stock, get the portfolio manager, not only buy it, but then scale the position. It just doesn't matter. It's the proverbial tree in the woods.”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 8:19 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: Investor diversity and independence are fundamentally distinct market mechanisms
“Diversity and independence are completely different issues. Lack of diversity is when everyone's thinking the same way. Independence is slightly different, where people are diverse, but when they go to express their opinion, then they're collectively influence…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 14:46 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: Non-diverse shareholder bases make stocks prone to violent moves
“Just because you lack diversity or independence doesn't mean they're wrong. And there's a subtlety there that's not insignificant. We're not saying that Amazon is mispriced. We're just saying the crowd's not very diverse. So if an event happens that challenges…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 16:52 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: Index funds are price takers whose bear-market impact remains unknown
“Index funds by definition are price takers. And what we don't fully know is what happens if We ever have a bear market and index funds have to sell.”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 18:43 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Paul Johnson: Investment edge is strictly informational, analytical, or trading
“So an edge is either I know something the market doesn't know, that's that information, I have figured something out, what we say in the book, I see something the market doesn't see, or I have a trading advantage, which is either I'm willing to trade or I have…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 20:32 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: Analysts must match a portfolio manager's schema to be heard
“So that first part of it is the scheme, and it ends up that the scheme is shockingly important, and it's important really as we continue to play with it is you're not going to get the portfolio manager to listen unless you match the stated schema.”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 30:48 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Insight
Johnson: The litmus test for creative teams is how they handle wrong ideas
“The litmus test for whether you have a creative organization is what do you do with people that are wrong? Because creativity is different. A lot of it's going to be wrong. Well, if you take people that are wrong, and I guess we, our analogy for the podcast is…”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 41:21 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Disclosure
Johnson: Stopped reading newspapers in favor of reading books
“So, as a rule, which shocks people, I stopped reading newspapers, and what I do is I use all that time to read books. I want to learn to think rather than read the news.”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 59:54 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Johnson: A 27-person pre-mortem uncovered four path-critical risks I missed
“I ran a pre-mortem a year ago on a project we were going to launch. 27 people in the room. Wrote 27 things down on the first pass. Five of them were path critical. Of those five, I'd only thought of one.”
Paul Johnson Sep 23, 2019 ▶ 38:11 Gary Klein with Paul Sonkin and Paul Johnson – Conducting Pre-Mortem Analysis (Capital Allocators, EP.109)
Opinion
Johnson: Michael Steinhardt's language on variant perception is convoluted
“We used Michael Steinhardt's variant perception as a very important cornerstone of thinking about how you get an edge in the market. And it was clear that his language is somewhat convoluted. The guy's brilliant, but his language is a little convoluted.”
Paul Johnson Nov 27, 2017 ▶ 10:36 Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32)

The other half of the tape: Paul Johnson's own voice is left out of every number here. Other people bring the name up 1 time in 1 episode on Capital Allocators. every mention, with the transcript →

Who brings them up most Ted Seides 1

Every mention by year

tap a year for its mentions
0011112018episodesmentions
0112018episodes it came up in
000.50.5112018episodesmentions per episode
2018 1 mention in 1 episode

Appearances (2)

EpisodeDateSpeaking time
Gary Klein with Paul Sonkin and Paul Johnson – Conducting Pre-Mortem Analysis (Capital All Sep 23, 2019 7m
Paul Johnson and Paul Sonkin – The Perfect Investment (Capital Allocators, EP.32) Nov 27, 2017 23m
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.