Aug 17, 2020 · 52m · capital-allocators
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion 2: Kim Lew – The Opportunity and Challenge (Capital Allocators, EP.152)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Kim Lew, Chief Investment Officer of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, exploring her personal journey through institutional finance, actionable strategies for building diverse investment teams, and empirical frameworks for evaluating external asset managers.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 18.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Kim forcefully rejects a peer CIO's doubt about diverse manager returns, stating that doubting equivalent performance distributions implies an underlying belief that minorities and women are inherently less capable.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 36:40 Ted challenges the thesis on outsized alpha in emerging diverse firmsTed presses Kim on why allocating capital to emerging minority managers generates a higher return given that private equity and active management are mature, consolidating industries.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 23:15 Kim dismantles collegiate sports screening shortcutsKim systematically demonstrates how standard allocator filters like collegiate lacrosse experience create unconscious racial barriers, offering restaurant work coordination as an overlooked proxy for teamwork.
Ted holds their own ▶ 36:22 Ted articulates structural market maturation across alternativesTed leverages his deep institutional industry knowledge to question whether mature asset class dynamics and fee pressures impede new entrants regardless of diversity.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Trust Front Office Solutions Sponsorship | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ted opens the episode with sponsor acknowledgments and frames the DEI mini-series as an educational initiative following Black Lives Matter protests. As a solo introductory monologue, all interactive metrics are baseline zero. | |
| Kim Lew's Upbringing and Dual Cultural Identity | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted prompts Kim to discuss her childhood navigating dual African American and Chinese immigrant parentage. Kim details how she proactively disclosed her background to weed out prejudice early. | |
| Childhood Encounters with Systemic Bias in the Bronx | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | Ted asks whether racial bias felt pervasive growing up. Kim educates him on the necessity of 'the talk' in Black households and recounts police interrogating her as a suspect after a stray bullet entered her Bronx apartment. | |
| Navigating Early Career Microaggressions and Sexism | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | Kim distinguishes between race and gender dynamics early in her career, detailing overt sexism at Chemical Bank where male executives casually suggested 'putting Kim on the table' to win deals. | |
| Business School Isolation and Cultural Barriers | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | Kim recounts overt racial slurs on her first day at Harvard Business School and peers rationalizing state lotteries as the sole hope for minorities, explaining how isolation chills classroom participation and networking. | |
| Transitioning to Non-Profit Allocation at Ford and Carnegie | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Ted probes Kim's career pivot to foundation endowments. Kim explains the generational and non-adversarial environment at the Ford Foundation under Clint Stevenson, contrasting it with Carnegie's collaborative culture under Ellen Shuman. | |
| Cultivating Diverse Teams and Cognitive Pluralism | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | Kim discusses building cognitive diversity at Carnegie, including hiring an Asian male with fund-of-funds experience to introduce devil's advocacy and balance an all-female team. | |
| Evaluating Manager Biases and Eliminating Screening Shortcuts | 6 | 8 | 2 | 1 | Kim critiques institutional shortcuts in manager screening, such as using collegiate lacrosse as a proxy for teamwork, and illustrates how alternative proxies like service industry experience capture similar traits without excluding minorities. | |
| Portfolio Diversity Scorecarding and Performance Linkage | 6 | 7 | 1 | 0 | Kim explains Carnegie's portfolio scorecarding process, revealing an unexpected empirical finding: managers who ranked highest in historical and forward-looking performance independently held the highest diversity scores. | |
| Carnegie's Manager Diversity Rating Methodology | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks how Carnegie operationalizes its diversity metric. Kim outlines their 1-to-3 grading methodology focused on ownership, senior decision-makers, and trajectory over time. | |
| Debunking Return Dispersion Myths in Diverse Sourcing | 5 | 8 | 4 | 0 | Kim recounts confronting a skeptical peer CIO, arguing that believing diverse managers have worse return distributions logically implies assuming minorities are fundamentally inferior, whereas structural barriers actually weed out mediocrity. | |
| Uncovering Outsized Alpha in Emerging and Diverse Funds | 7 | 6 | 2 | 4 | Ted challenges Kim on why early-stage minority managers offer better opportunity given industry concentration and passive tailwinds. Kim clarifies the distinction between macro industry impact and finding nimble alpha. | |
| Illiquid Assets, Network Bottlenecks, and Apprenticeship | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | Ted and Kim discuss network bottlenecks in private equity and venture capital. Kim notes the necessity of institutional apprenticeship programs to build access networks for spinout firms. | |
| Industry Leadership, Mentorship, and Pipeline Organizations | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Kim highlights her board and mentorship involvement with SEO, Toigo, NASP, and Girls Who Invest, invoking Michelle Obama's dictum that sitting in a position of power without advocating for others wastes the seat. | |
| Dismantling Scarcity Mindsets in Institutional Finance | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | Kim diagnoses zero-sum scarcity mindsets as the core barrier to DEI progress. She references HBS historically adding an entire section to expand minority admissions without reducing existing slots. |