The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Ken Langone no published score: only 2 usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
2on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q Neither of them went to high school. You started working at age 11 or 12. How'd your upbringing shape you and help you become a leader?

A I learned, for example, one of the things I won't take a backseat to is judgment of people. I got a pretty good nose for people. That talent or that ability became conscious to me when I was a caddy. Huh. And I'd caddy for people. There were two types. There were guys that if they had a bad shot, they didn't blame it on anybody else for themselves. And there were guys that if they had a bad shot, they're looking around, who's around that I can blame? And typically the guy that gets the punishment is the caddy. The caddy, yeah. But I learned close up, because these guys, don't forget, they think we're just mechanical. We, we don't, oh, we don't evaluate, we don't observe, we don't do the things. I made it a point to studying The men I was caddying for, and how they behaved, and how they treated each other, and how they talked to each other, and how they treated the caddies. To this day, Joe, one of the things I love to do, um, if I'm being asked to evaluate somebody for a job at one of the companies, I like to take them to a meal. I love to watch how they interact with a waiter or the busboy. How do they talk to them?

AI assessment note: “That talent or that ability became conscious to me when I was a caddy.”

Answered raw tape D 4 · C 3 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.55

Q So if you put a good group of guys in, what, what have you looked for in management and leadership? What does that mean to you?

A First of all, I look for honesty. It'd be the basic stuff. I look for honesty. I look for wisdom in terms of breadth of thinking. Are they thinking provincially or are they thinking globally? Are they thinking about the opportunities and the possibilities? The thing I loved about Lily's research was they had a strong franchise in antibiotics back then. Uh, they had a significant animal health business. Ironically, they owned Elizabeth Arden, the cosmetics company, which they eventually sold. But more importantly, they made their mind up. They wanted to go into medical devices in a bigger way. So they bought a, uh, a cardiac pacemaker company, uh, um, uh, they bought, they bought a, um, uh, defibrillator company. They bought a number of companies related to devices. Most of the devices, of course, were related.

AI assessment note: “First of all, I look for honesty. It'd be the basic stuff.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 150 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.