Dynamic Reteaming
topic on 1 show · 4 statements across 1 episodes
4 statements about Dynamic Reteaming, every show
Helfand: Splitting teams creates new dependencies and shared role bottlenecks
“Sometimes splitting, though, can create dependencies that weren't there when you were together as one team. So you inherit other problems, or you might inherit challenges like, all right, the team decides it's more effective if they split into two or three, bu…”
Helfand: Reorgs imply top-down mandates, unlike dynamic reteaming patterns
“I think reorg, you know, again, it's true that reorganization is a traditional word and implies on the large, it implies Top down changes that you have no say in. It's just, it's something different than what I consider reteaming, which is these five patterns …”
Helfand: Collaborative reteaming should be kept short to avoid organizational distraction
“Make a schedule, right? Bias towards shorter as opposed to longer. You don't want to deliberate on this forever because especially as you include more people, you know, it can be distracting. So you want to like proceed as expediently as you can.”
Helfand: Fast-growing companies must embrace dynamic reteaming instead of static structures
“A lot of the books I would read on teams And the advice that I would get from people would be, ah, you know, you really want to keep your teams the same. You want to go for that forming, storming, norming, performing kind of thing. And I had thought about that…”