why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Disclosure
Glueck: Foursquare profiles 150 million Americans via location data
“We profile hundred fifty million Americans based on the places they go, both through our own apps, but through a network of partners using our technology”
Assertion Contradicted
Glueck: Hotels are replacing human concierges with Foursquare's recommendation engine
“We enable for hotels, a bunch of hotels have gotten rid of their concierges, and they're just using the Foursquare recommendation engine in the hotels of the future”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Glueck: 125,000 companies use Foursquare's developer platform
“For Foursquare, we have a 125,000 companies using our platform to build better mobile experiences.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Glueck: Foursquare SDK drove 400% CTR and 66% revenue bump for TouchTunes
“They had, like, 400% increase in the click-through, and they had a 66% revenue increase, because it's a social message at the right time and the right place to the right person.”
Assertion Partly supported
Glueck: TouchTunes is a $500M business across 65,000 locations
“It's a five hundred million dollar music business in 65,000 locations, and their problem was, they have jukeboxes, right?”
Disclosure
Glueck: Foursquare reaches 50 million monthly active users
“There's still fifty million people a month used across our apps and our website”