Perault: Existing criminal and civil laws already cover most real-world AI harms
Matt Perault · The Little Tech Agenda for AI · Sep 8, 2025 · at 26:47
Matt Perault, Head of AI Policy at a16z, argues that regulating harmful uses of AI under existing legal frameworks is sufficient to address public concerns.
0:00 / 0:08exact quote · 8.6s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“And again, and most of the things that people are most concerned about, like real, real use of the technology for clear cognizable real world harm existing law typically covers it.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Matt Perault
Perault: Proposed AI regulations would have entrenched market incumbents and stifled startups
“Many of the politicians who are put, were pushing concepts that would have really put a stranglehold, I think, on AI startups and would have led to more monopolization of a market that already tends toward monopoly because of the high barriers to entry already…”
Perault: Regulate AI applications and use, not underlying model development
“Regulate use. Do not regulate development.”
Perault: Government and industry previously proposed nuclear-style licensing for AI models
“There were ideas being proposed by not just the government, but industry to require a license. To build frontier AI tools and for it to be regulated like nuclear energy.”
Perault: Proposed AI regulations burden startups without actually protecting consumers
“Licensing, nuclear style regulation like flops, threshold based disclosures, really complicated transparency regimes, impact assessments, audits, which are a bunch of ideas that we think are not going to help protect people and are going to make it really hard…”