George Church

Professor of Genetics, Harvard Medical School · 1 appearance on the record.

computed by AI from the episodes · how this works → · full disclaimer →

scientistacademicfounderengineerauthor@geochurch ↗arep.med.harvard.edu/gmc ↗Wikipedia ↗

George Church is widely recognized for pioneering direct genomic sequencing, molecular multiplexing, and early CRISPR gene editing in mammalian cells. He has co-founded dozens of biotechnology companies and co-authored the book Regenesis.

25statements → 12claims → 11claims resolved → 73%fully supported → 3.92/5average certainty → 2.68/5average debate potential → 9said about them ↓

8 supported 3 partly supported 0 contradicted 1 not checkable as stated how the 12 claims stand · each chip opens the sources

1 prediction · 11 assertions · 4 opinions · 9 insights · every statement was checked. The prediction and assertions are the 12 claims: statements the public record can support or contradict. 11 are resolved, and 1 names no date, number or outcome precise enough to check. Everything else (opinions, insights, what ifs, disclosures) can never be settled by the record, so it carries no assessment.

The record, in short

What the tape says about how George argues and how the claims held up. Everything they said, and everything said about them, is in the tabs below.

Their most notable supported claim

Assertion Supported
Church: Off-target edits appear low in first two CRISPR babies
“So the amount of off-target and mosaicism so far for these two babies seems to be low, but time will tell.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 7:37 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?

Expressed certainty vs assessment result

none yet certainty 1
none yet certainty 2
75% certainty 3
83% certainty 4
100% certainty 5

weighted support: a fully supported claim counts one, a partly supported claim counts half. Each filled bar is clickable and opens exactly those claims; "none yet" means nothing said at that certainty level has resolved yet

How they sound: speaking style how? →

242 words/min while actually speaking · 2.1 um and uh per 1k words

No argument clarity score for George Church: no usable question→answer exchanges on raw tape (a fair score needs 8+). We do not score a sample that small. Roundtable and news formats yield far fewer direct exchanges than interviews.

Measured by listening to 5,793 words across 1 episode, but every recording we have of George Church is the aired feed, and an editor cleaned that audio before release. Some of the hesitation was cut before we ever heard it, so read these as floors: the true rates are at least this high. These are measurements of speaking style, not scores. How it's measured →

Everything George Church said on the a16z Podcast that made the record, most notable first. Filter by type, assessment or year in the ledger →

Assertion Partly supported
Church: Chinese government likely knew about CRISPR baby experiment
“I wouldn't characterize it as a solo effort. I've seen the author list. It's quite long, and I also find it unlikely that a government as technically astute and as engaged in observation would be unaware of such an important thing.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 1:30 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Opinion
Church: Targeting HIV via CRISPR is more justifiable than Mendelian diseases
“Yeah, I think that we want an example of a disease that is very common, and most of the gene therapies are rare, whether they're editing or not, and we want something that's very serious, and certainly HIV falls in that category, So it struck me as a plausibly…”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 9:54 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: CRISPR is gene damaging rather than precision editing
“So what CRISPR does well, it's often described as editing. It really is damaging, is what it is. It's not really that good at precision editing.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 3:16 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Off-target edits appear low in first two CRISPR babies
“So the amount of off-target and mosaicism so far for these two babies seems to be low, but time will tell.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 7:37 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Embryo selection avoids Mendelian diseases without CRISPR editing
“Ignoring the fact that if you're in an IVF, PGD clinic anyway. To do your CRISPR editing of your Mendelian disease, you could just do selection for most of these things.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 9:16 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Church: Gene editing moratoriums will accelerate research rather than halt it
“Well, there probably will be something that looks like a pause, but it will probably be an acceleration.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 12:20 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Regulators favor breakthrough therapeutic platforms over incremental updates
“To some extent, I think they like new technologies more than they like the old ones. The old ones tend to fail because they're so incremental that they're no longer compared to the placebo, they're compared to whatever they're in increment over, whatever thera…”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 13:39 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Genetic testing less than whole genome sequencing gives false assurance
“Which is not, there are a very small number of companies that provide whole genome sequencing because everything else, anything less than whole genome sequencing is not medically powerful enough. Anything less than that misses, gives you false assurance.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 16:51 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Dor Yeshorim has eliminated Tay-Sachs via genetic matchmaking
“And this actually works. So, Dorya Shurim has eliminated significant meningitis disease like Tay-Sachs by practicing a version of this that probably isn't perfectly generalizable, but there are versions of this that could keep a great deal of privacy.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 17:41 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Opinion
Church: Genome sequencing must cost zero dollars for mass adoption
“The cost should probably be zero dollars.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 20:17 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: The Church Lab prioritizes niceness over genius when recruiting researchers
“So then the biggest filter for me, and I tell this in the first interview, the first conversation I have, is we're looking for people that are nice. We're not necessarily looking for geniuses. We got plenty of geniuses. We're looking for people that are nice.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 34:03 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Genetic recoding can render any organism resistant to all viruses
“Biocontainment using recoding is a way that we can make any organism resistant to all viruses and horizontal transfer. Most of these things now work.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 37:12 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Lab achieved 10,000 gene edits in a single cell
“So we set the record of 62 edits in the pigs, and we now have edits, so we have 10,000 edits in a single cell.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 39:30 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Mammoth project aims for ecological hybrids, not true de-extinction
“But for the mammoth, there are lots of reasons. Both for the environment and for enriching the diversity of a living endangered species. So this is not about de-extinction. This is about making hybrids, and many of the species are already hybrids of multiple s…”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 40:23 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Partly supported
Church: 20% CRISPR T-cell edit efficiency is sufficient in adult HIV trials
“So first of all, in the approved clinical trials on adults that have HIV AIDS, there is a lot of mosaicism. It's considered part of the clinical trial, and maybe as little as 20% are properly edited, meaning double nulls. That's enough though, because all the …”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 6:04 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Opinion
Church: Regulatory agencies smooth technological progress out rather than slowing it
“They are not agents of slowing things down. They're actually agents of smoothing things out.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 13:22 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Only 1% to 4% face severe Mendelian genetic risks
“It's this strange thing where one to four percent of the population will have a very big impact on their life. And the bottom line for their care providers, millions of dollars, huge impact on the whole family, if you're one of the unlucky four percent.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 21:59 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Strong encryption lets individuals refuse genomic subpoenas
“And if it's encrypted so that even you can't hack it, then you can just say, sorry, it's out of my hands. I don't have my genome. If you want my genome, you're going to have to steal it from me. Right? And I think that's where we are today, finally.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 24:25 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Opinion
Church: Most medical data sharing for research is an inaccessible silo
“What a lot of people call sharing, even to this day, you know, 13 years later, they call sharing medical data for research is really a silo that's hard to get into. Unfortunately, it's not impossible to get into. It's not really encrypted the way you would wan…”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 28:07 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Lead researchers should sometimes serve as test subjects in studies
“Sometimes it's important for the top researcher to also be a guinea pig in the study.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 32:10 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Supported
Church: Double-null CCR5 mutations increase susceptibility to West Nile virus
“That is correct. So there's a risk for almost every preventative and therapy, and this is the risk in this case, in most populations that's considered a smaller medical risk.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 4:39 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Assertion Partly supported
Church: NIH and NCI allocate only 1-5% of budgets to prevention
“If you look at the pie charts for a number of government agencies, including the NCI, NIH in general, is preventative is sort of in the one to five percent of the pie chart, but its payback is enormous.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 14:58 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Labs should avoid competition by collaborating or leaving crowded fields
“You try not to compete with other labs if you can avoid it. Sometimes it's unavoidable, but you can avoid it by inviting them to work with them. Leaving alone fields where there's plenty of momentum and a lack of interest in collaboration.”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 34:35 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?
Insight
Church: Multidisciplinary teams require hiring people who are already multidisciplinary
“I mainly recruit people who are multilingual, multidisciplinary, because I found it's hard to build a multidisciplinary team From disciplinarians. You have to have a lot of people who already have done two things, and even if you get two people who have done t…”
George Church Apr 1, 2019 ▶ 38:21 a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab?

Show 1statements(1 left)

The other half of the tape: George Church's own voice is left out of every number here. Other people bring the name up 8 times in 1 episode on the a16z Podcast. 1 statement on the record names them. every mention, with the transcript →

Who brings them up most Sonal Chokshi 4Ross Anderson 4

Statements about George Church, by other people (1)

Opinion
George Church's minimal gene-editing strategy is the right approach to de-extinction
“He has the right approach, which is to make, like, again, as few tweaks to this genome as possible, just so you get these basic features, and then let nature do the rest.”
Ross Anderson Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 10:31 a16z Podcast | Making a (Really) Wild Geo-Engineering Idea Real

Every mention by year

tap a year for its mentions
0041812019episodesmentions
0112019episodes it came up in
0040.5812019episodesmentions per episode
2019 8 mentions in 1 episode

Appearances (1)

EpisodeDateSpeaking time
a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab? Apr 1, 2019 30m
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.