Church: Strong encryption lets individuals refuse genomic subpoenas
George Church · a16z Podcast | What's in the Water at the George Church Lab? · Apr 1, 2019 · at 24:25
Geneticist George Church discusses genomic privacy with Andreessen Horowitz partner Jorge Conde, explaining how cryptographic tools protect personal DNA data from external demands.
0:00 / 0:11exact quote · 11.3s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“And if it's encrypted so that even you can't hack it, then you can just say, sorry, it's out of my hands. I don't have my genome. If you want my genome, you're going to have to steal it from me. Right? And I think that's where we are today, finally.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from George Church
Church: Chinese government likely knew about CRISPR baby experiment
“I wouldn't characterize it as a solo effort. I've seen the author list. It's quite long, and I also find it unlikely that a government as technically astute and as engaged in observation would be unaware of such an important thing.”
Church: Targeting HIV via CRISPR is more justifiable than Mendelian diseases
“Yeah, I think that we want an example of a disease that is very common, and most of the gene therapies are rare, whether they're editing or not, and we want something that's very serious, and certainly HIV falls in that category, So it struck me as a plausibly…”
Church: CRISPR is gene damaging rather than precision editing
“So what CRISPR does well, it's often described as editing. It really is damaging, is what it is. It's not really that good at precision editing.”
Church: Off-target edits appear low in first two CRISPR babies
“So the amount of off-target and mosaicism so far for these two babies seems to be low, but time will tell.”