Jan 2, 2019 · 27m · a16z
a16z Podcast | Defeating Aging with Aubrey de Grey
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this podcast episode, host Michael Copeland interviews gerontologist Aubrey de Grey on applying an engineering mindset and damage-repair framework (SENS) to defeat human aging, addressing scientific mechanisms, institutional funding obstacles, and societal concerns.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →
The host as informed peer 2.5 Guest teaching 5.0 Guest disagreement 2.4 The host pushing back 1.3
speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 6:49 Calling out host backsliding
Guest directly interrupts and reprimands the host for returning to an extending life framing rather than focusing on health maintenance.
Hardest push from the host ▶ 23:30 Challenging life extension on resource groundsHost presses guest on practical real-world consequences of extended life, citing housing costs, food supply, and climate change.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 6:49 Correcting host framing on health versus longevityGuest stops host mid-sentence to correct his terminology, causing host to apologize and restate the question around health.
The host holds their own ▶ 13:34 Drawing internet and data silo analogyHost demonstrates solid technical grasp by comparing guest cross-disciplinary synthesis to internet-enabled data integration across healthcare silos.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | The host as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | The host pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applying Computer Science Mindsets and Academic Community Reception | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Host asks basic introductory questions about how the guest transitioned from software and AI into biology, and how academics received him. Guest explains how gerontologists lacked a goal-directed technologist mindset and details his initial acceptance before being viewed as a troublemaker. | |
| The Rejuvenation Damage Repair Paradigm and SENS Framework | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | Guest immediately interrupts the host to scold him for backsliding into extending life language rather than health maintenance. Host apologizes and accepts the reframe, allowing guest to explain damage repair and SENS framework. | |
| Mechanisms of Repair: Stem Cell Therapies and Bacterial Enzymes | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | Host asks how damage repair works functionally, and guest explains stem cell therapies for Parkinson disease and bacterial enzymes for cholesterol degradation. Host offers a brief supportive summary comment without pushback. | |
| Interdisciplinary Data Sharing and Peer-Review Grant Bottlenecks | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | Host presents a thoughtful analogy comparing guest cross-disciplinary information retrieval to internet data sharing across silos. Guest offers a nuanced yes and no response while sharply criticizing academic grant peer-review mechanisms as risk-averse cover. | |
| The Human Machine Analogy and Exploiting Damage Tolerance Thresholds | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | Host asks how software thinking applies to biological engineering. Guest uses a car and machine parts analogy to explain damage tolerance thresholds in human metabolism. | |
| Current Clinical Progress and the Mission of SENS Research Foundation | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Host asks about current progress and whether guest is in competition with Ray Kurzweil. Guest reframes competition into a friendly race and explains the three technological bridges to longevity. | |
| Addressing Overpopulation Concerns and Planet Carrying Capacity | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | Host challenges guest on societal risks like overpopulation and resource strain in the Bay Area. Guest dismisses overpopulation concerns as an insidious knee-jerk reaction and cites demographic forecasting models and carrying capacity tech. | |
| Software Tools in Healthcare and Podcast Conclusion | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Host asks whether software tools like CRISPR and compute will accelerate medical progress. Guest clarifies that enabling computational tools do not automatically equal fundamental biological breakthroughs, which host synthesizes during sign-off. |
Statements from this episode (10)
De Grey: Biological aging is humanity's most important problem
“Aging was the world's most important problem, the source of the world's greatest amount of suffering, and so on.”
De Grey: AI is only humanity's second most important problem
“Making machines smart enough to relieve us of the tedium of having to spend our lives doing things that we wouldn't do if we weren't being paid in order to make the world go around. Yeah, so I wanted that to end. But I always knew that that was only the world'…”
De Grey: Aging research stalled because scientists lacked an engineering mindset
“I realized that a lot of the reason why people were not making progress in postponing the ill health of old age was because they were going about it more as, you know, lifelong basic scientists and not so much as technologists with a more goal-directed kind of…”
De Grey: Peer-reviewed funding is a catastrophe for high-risk scientific research
“Peer review is an absolute catastrophe when it comes to doing anything high risk, high reward, and also for that matter doing anything cross-disciplinary.”
De Grey: Engineering maintenance principles can postpone the ill health of aging
“Any machine, and of course the human body is just a machine, right any machine has moving parts, it does damage to itself as a side effect of its normal operation, so one can use the same principles, the same, like, top-level principles to postpone the ill hea…”
De Grey: Amyloid clearance is solved but requires combination therapies for Alzheimer's
“Well, in one case, Alzheimer's disease, that's also, that's very much in clinical trials, and we basically solve the problem. That can now be eliminated. It doesn't have much effect on Alzheimer's disease on its own, but it's a fair bet that in combination wit…”
De Grey: Ray Kurzweil is overly optimistic about current anti-aging methods
“He is actually a lot more optimistic than me with regard to how much we can postpone aging with stuff that already exists today.”
De Grey accepts non-biological longevity solutions if biotech stalls
“I'm quite sentimental about being made out of meat, but at the same time, you know, if the Push came to shove and the work that we do and other people do on the biotech side started to, you know, hit diminishing returns and basically run into the sand and work…”