Jan 2, 2019 · 29m · a16z

a16z Podcast | Monetizing Open Source (Or, All Enterprise Software)

James Waters · 15m spoken Martin Casado · 8m spoken Sonal Chokshi · 3m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this a16z podcast episode, Sonal Chokshi, Martin Casado, and Pivotal's James Waters examine how open source software companies can build multi-hundred-million-dollar commercial businesses. They analyze why monetization requires targeting enterprise buyers and architectural megatrends rather than relying solely on low-margin support contracts or commoditization strategies.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The host holds 12.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 5.2 Guest teaching 4.3 Guest disagreement 1.2 The host pushing back 2.7
05100:0010:0020:001:39–4:04 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Enterprise Buyers vs. Developer Community Focus James explains his core thesis that open source companies fail when they cater to developer users rather than enterprise buyers. Sonal asks clarifying questions and gently questions how companies can balance both community and revenue.4:04–7:30 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Catching Megatrends vs. The Commoditization Trap James reframes open source history, claiming big companies catch megatrends rather than relying on commoditization. Martin contributes well-informed context regarding ceiling caps on commoditizing existing sales dollars.7:30–10:51 · The host as informed peer 7/10 Delivery Models, Service Experience, and UI Packaging Martin demonstrates deep domain expertise with an extended monologue separating consumption models (as-a-service) from deployment locations (on-prem vs off-prem). James outlines keeping UIs closed-source to aid procurement packaging.10:51–13:34 · The host as informed peer 6/10 Procurement Strategy and Avoiding Open Source 'Dog Piles' James explains how procurement officers seek comparables and why open source companies must avoid dog piles. Martin strongly validates this, restating the necessity of maintaining sole-supplier status.13:34–16:12 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Managing Competition and Justifying Large Enterprise Deals Martin poses a direct question asking why an enterprise would pay $10M for a contract when open source code is free online. James explains that large checks buy extended team relationships and architectural advisory rather than raw software.16:12–18:23 · The host as informed peer 8/10 Enterprise Sales Metrics and Strategic Account Control Martin presents his detailed sales economics theory on the valley of death between $30k and $150k ACV. James reframes the goal from sales margins to securing strategic account control with $400k+ deals.18:23–21:26 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Cloud Disruption and the Driving Forces Behind Open Source Growth Sonal directly pushes back on James and Martin, arguing that rapid iteration and community experimentation are inherent advantages of open source. James holds his ground, arguing macro shifts drive value over open source mechanics.21:26–24:17 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Analyzing Red Hat's Limits and Lessons from Past Failures James educates the hosts on the limitations of Red Hat and details the historic collapse of Open Solaris revenue at Sun Microsystems when support-only models were mandated overnight.24:17–26:49 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Top-Down Product Vision and Vendor Lock-in Protection Martin and Sonal reframe top-down product direction, while James explains how enterprise buyers utilize open source as insurance against predatory vendor pricing structures like Oracle ELAs.26:49–29:10 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Startup Advice and Conclusion The exchange concludes collaboratively as James advises founders to ride emerging architectural trends, and Martin emphasizes first-principles thinking over copying legacy VM patterns.1:39–4:04 · Guest teaching 5/10 Enterprise Buyers vs. Developer Community Focus James explains his core thesis that open source companies fail when they cater to developer users rather than enterprise buyers. Sonal asks clarifying questions and gently questions how companies can balance both community and revenue.4:04–7:30 · Guest teaching 4/10 Catching Megatrends vs. The Commoditization Trap James reframes open source history, claiming big companies catch megatrends rather than relying on commoditization. Martin contributes well-informed context regarding ceiling caps on commoditizing existing sales dollars.7:30–10:51 · Guest teaching 3/10 Delivery Models, Service Experience, and UI Packaging Martin demonstrates deep domain expertise with an extended monologue separating consumption models (as-a-service) from deployment locations (on-prem vs off-prem). James outlines keeping UIs closed-source to aid procurement packaging.10:51–13:34 · Guest teaching 4/10 Procurement Strategy and Avoiding Open Source 'Dog Piles' James explains how procurement officers seek comparables and why open source companies must avoid dog piles. Martin strongly validates this, restating the necessity of maintaining sole-supplier status.13:34–16:12 · Guest teaching 5/10 Managing Competition and Justifying Large Enterprise Deals Martin poses a direct question asking why an enterprise would pay $10M for a contract when open source code is free online. James explains that large checks buy extended team relationships and architectural advisory rather than raw software.16:12–18:23 · Guest teaching 4/10 Enterprise Sales Metrics and Strategic Account Control Martin presents his detailed sales economics theory on the valley of death between $30k and $150k ACV. James reframes the goal from sales margins to securing strategic account control with $400k+ deals.18:23–21:26 · Guest teaching 4/10 Cloud Disruption and the Driving Forces Behind Open Source Growth Sonal directly pushes back on James and Martin, arguing that rapid iteration and community experimentation are inherent advantages of open source. James holds his ground, arguing macro shifts drive value over open source mechanics.21:26–24:17 · Guest teaching 6/10 Analyzing Red Hat's Limits and Lessons from Past Failures James educates the hosts on the limitations of Red Hat and details the historic collapse of Open Solaris revenue at Sun Microsystems when support-only models were mandated overnight.24:17–26:49 · Guest teaching 5/10 Top-Down Product Vision and Vendor Lock-in Protection Martin and Sonal reframe top-down product direction, while James explains how enterprise buyers utilize open source as insurance against predatory vendor pricing structures like Oracle ELAs.26:49–29:10 · Guest teaching 3/10 Startup Advice and Conclusion The exchange concludes collaboratively as James advises founders to ride emerging architectural trends, and Martin emphasizes first-principles thinking over copying legacy VM patterns.1:39–4:04 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Enterprise Buyers vs. Developer Community Focus James explains his core thesis that open source companies fail when they cater to developer users rather than enterprise buyers. Sonal asks clarifying questions and gently questions how companies can balance both community and revenue.4:04–7:30 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Catching Megatrends vs. The Commoditization Trap James reframes open source history, claiming big companies catch megatrends rather than relying on commoditization. Martin contributes well-informed context regarding ceiling caps on commoditizing existing sales dollars.7:30–10:51 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Delivery Models, Service Experience, and UI Packaging Martin demonstrates deep domain expertise with an extended monologue separating consumption models (as-a-service) from deployment locations (on-prem vs off-prem). James outlines keeping UIs closed-source to aid procurement packaging.10:51–13:34 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Procurement Strategy and Avoiding Open Source 'Dog Piles' James explains how procurement officers seek comparables and why open source companies must avoid dog piles. Martin strongly validates this, restating the necessity of maintaining sole-supplier status.13:34–16:12 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Managing Competition and Justifying Large Enterprise Deals Martin poses a direct question asking why an enterprise would pay $10M for a contract when open source code is free online. James explains that large checks buy extended team relationships and architectural advisory rather than raw software.16:12–18:23 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Enterprise Sales Metrics and Strategic Account Control Martin presents his detailed sales economics theory on the valley of death between $30k and $150k ACV. James reframes the goal from sales margins to securing strategic account control with $400k+ deals.18:23–21:26 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Cloud Disruption and the Driving Forces Behind Open Source Growth Sonal directly pushes back on James and Martin, arguing that rapid iteration and community experimentation are inherent advantages of open source. James holds his ground, arguing macro shifts drive value over open source mechanics.21:26–24:17 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Analyzing Red Hat's Limits and Lessons from Past Failures James educates the hosts on the limitations of Red Hat and details the historic collapse of Open Solaris revenue at Sun Microsystems when support-only models were mandated overnight.24:17–26:49 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Top-Down Product Vision and Vendor Lock-in Protection Martin and Sonal reframe top-down product direction, while James explains how enterprise buyers utilize open source as insurance against predatory vendor pricing structures like Oracle ELAs.26:49–29:10 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Startup Advice and Conclusion The exchange concludes collaboratively as James advises founders to ride emerging architectural trends, and Martin emphasizes first-principles thinking over copying legacy VM patterns.1:39–4:04 · The host pushing back 2/10 Enterprise Buyers vs. Developer Community Focus James explains his core thesis that open source companies fail when they cater to developer users rather than enterprise buyers. Sonal asks clarifying questions and gently questions how companies can balance both community and revenue.4:04–7:30 · The host pushing back 3/10 Catching Megatrends vs. The Commoditization Trap James reframes open source history, claiming big companies catch megatrends rather than relying on commoditization. Martin contributes well-informed context regarding ceiling caps on commoditizing existing sales dollars.7:30–10:51 · The host pushing back 2/10 Delivery Models, Service Experience, and UI Packaging Martin demonstrates deep domain expertise with an extended monologue separating consumption models (as-a-service) from deployment locations (on-prem vs off-prem). James outlines keeping UIs closed-source to aid procurement packaging.10:51–13:34 · The host pushing back 2/10 Procurement Strategy and Avoiding Open Source 'Dog Piles' James explains how procurement officers seek comparables and why open source companies must avoid dog piles. Martin strongly validates this, restating the necessity of maintaining sole-supplier status.13:34–16:12 · The host pushing back 3/10 Managing Competition and Justifying Large Enterprise Deals Martin poses a direct question asking why an enterprise would pay $10M for a contract when open source code is free online. James explains that large checks buy extended team relationships and architectural advisory rather than raw software.16:12–18:23 · The host pushing back 3/10 Enterprise Sales Metrics and Strategic Account Control Martin presents his detailed sales economics theory on the valley of death between $30k and $150k ACV. James reframes the goal from sales margins to securing strategic account control with $400k+ deals.18:23–21:26 · The host pushing back 7/10 Cloud Disruption and the Driving Forces Behind Open Source Growth Sonal directly pushes back on James and Martin, arguing that rapid iteration and community experimentation are inherent advantages of open source. James holds his ground, arguing macro shifts drive value over open source mechanics.21:26–24:17 · The host pushing back 2/10 Analyzing Red Hat's Limits and Lessons from Past Failures James educates the hosts on the limitations of Red Hat and details the historic collapse of Open Solaris revenue at Sun Microsystems when support-only models were mandated overnight.24:17–26:49 · The host pushing back 2/10 Top-Down Product Vision and Vendor Lock-in Protection Martin and Sonal reframe top-down product direction, while James explains how enterprise buyers utilize open source as insurance against predatory vendor pricing structures like Oracle ELAs.26:49–29:10 · The host pushing back 1/10 Startup Advice and Conclusion The exchange concludes collaboratively as James advises founders to ride emerging architectural trends, and Martin emphasizes first-principles thinking over copying legacy VM patterns.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 31.6% · guest 68.4%0:00 · the host 31.6% · guest 68.4%3:00 · the host 13.3% · guest 86.7%3:00 · the host 13.3% · guest 86.7%6:00 · the host 0.2% · guest 99.8%6:00 · the host 0.2% · guest 99.8%9:00 · the host 16.8% · guest 83.2%9:00 · the host 16.8% · guest 83.2%12:00 · the host 8.8% · guest 91.2%12:00 · the host 8.8% · guest 91.2%15:00 · the host 3.1% · guest 96.9%15:00 · the host 3.1% · guest 96.9%18:00 · the host 16.5% · guest 83.5%18:00 · the host 16.5% · guest 83.5%21:00 · the host 9.8% · guest 90.2%21:00 · the host 9.8% · guest 90.2%24:00 · the host 10.2% · guest 89.8%24:00 · the host 10.2% · guest 89.8%27:00 · the host 20.4% · guest 79.6%27:00 · the host 20.4% · guest 79.6%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 5:16 Rejecting the Commoditization Business Model

James forcefully rejects the industry consensus that open source is primarily a commoditization strategy, calling it a false horizon and pointing to global software history.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 19:28 Sonal Refuses the Pure Software Thesis

Sonal explicitly interrupts to challenge both James and Martin, refusing the premise that open source doesn't have inherent developmental and community advantages.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 23:15 The Open Solaris Revenue Collapse

James educates the hosts on the cautionary history of Sun Microsystems, explaining how executive mandates to make Open Solaris free instantly wiped out hundreds of millions in existing revenue.

The host holds their own ▶ 16:04 Martin's ACV Valley of Death Theory

Martin articulates a detailed, highly authoritative breakdown of enterprise sales economics, explaining why software contracts between 30k and 150k fail to sustain direct sales forces.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Enterprise Buyers vs. Developer Community Focus 3512 James explains his core thesis that open source companies fail when they cater to developer users rather than enterprise buyers. Sonal asks clarifying questions and gently questions how companies can balance both community and revenue.
Catching Megatrends vs. The Commoditization Trap 5423 James reframes open source history, claiming big companies catch megatrends rather than relying on commoditization. Martin contributes well-informed context regarding ceiling caps on commoditizing existing sales dollars.
Delivery Models, Service Experience, and UI Packaging 7312 Martin demonstrates deep domain expertise with an extended monologue separating consumption models (as-a-service) from deployment locations (on-prem vs off-prem). James outlines keeping UIs closed-source to aid procurement packaging.
Procurement Strategy and Avoiding Open Source 'Dog Piles' 6412 James explains how procurement officers seek comparables and why open source companies must avoid dog piles. Martin strongly validates this, restating the necessity of maintaining sole-supplier status.
Managing Competition and Justifying Large Enterprise Deals 4513 Martin poses a direct question asking why an enterprise would pay $10M for a contract when open source code is free online. James explains that large checks buy extended team relationships and architectural advisory rather than raw software.
Enterprise Sales Metrics and Strategic Account Control 8423 Martin presents his detailed sales economics theory on the valley of death between $30k and $150k ACV. James reframes the goal from sales margins to securing strategic account control with $400k+ deals.
Cloud Disruption and the Driving Forces Behind Open Source Growth 5427 Sonal directly pushes back on James and Martin, arguing that rapid iteration and community experimentation are inherent advantages of open source. James holds his ground, arguing macro shifts drive value over open source mechanics.
Analyzing Red Hat's Limits and Lessons from Past Failures 4612 James educates the hosts on the limitations of Red Hat and details the historic collapse of Open Solaris revenue at Sun Microsystems when support-only models were mandated overnight.
Top-Down Product Vision and Vendor Lock-in Protection 5512 Martin and Sonal reframe top-down product direction, while James explains how enterprise buyers utilize open source as insurance against predatory vendor pricing structures like Oracle ELAs.
Startup Advice and Conclusion 5301 The exchange concludes collaboratively as James advises founders to ride emerging architectural trends, and Martin emphasizes first-principles thinking over copying legacy VM patterns.

Statements from this episode (22)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Casado: Massive investment in open source yields few successful companies
“There's been a ton of money that's been invested in open source. But almost no examples of successful companies built around it.”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 0:45
Assertion Contradicted
Casado: Pivotal Cloud Foundry reached $270M in software license sales
“Pivotal Count Foundry went from zero to two hundred and seventy million dollars in license. Not support.”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:12
Assertion Supported
VMware bought open-source SpringSource for over $400M
“SpringSource is like the most popular Java programming framework in the world, bought by VMware for pretty famous money, over four hundred million dollars as an open source project.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:52
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Waters: Early MongoDB sold $4,000 support contracts to thousands of users
“And I remember meeting MongoDB when they were early in their rise and they were selling, you know, a 4000 dollar support contract to thousands of users.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:42
Insight
Waters: Multibillion-dollar software companies succeed by catching megatrends, not commoditizing incumbents
“History tells us that the largest software companies in the world that get into the hundreds of billion in valuation, that's not what they did. They caught mega trends.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 5:33
Insight
Waters: Open source is now a required buying criterion for enterprise IT initiatives
“Open source is now both a necessary part of almost any major software company strategy because it's a buying criteria that, you know, enterprises have for major new initiatives.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 5:56
Insight
Casado: Delivering software as a service diminishes enterprise concerns about open source
“Once you're talking about something as a service, questions around open source kind of diminish. Because they're not actually dealing with the code itself, they're dealing with the service.”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:54
Disclosure
Waters: Pivotal kept its user interfaces closed source while open-sourcing infrastructure
“One of the decisions we made is we made our UIs closed source. So everything about the infrastructure of the platform is completely open source. And we chose to make the UI and that last mile of experience built off the APIs. Closed source.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:48
Insight
Waters: Proprietary UI components help open-source companies differentiate in enterprise procurement
“Procurement is exceptionally good at pricing a certain kind of thing, which is labor per hour. So I've seen very large software contract orders and procurement will actually pick on the labor per hour because that has a near comparable. And so when you start t…”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 10:13
Insight
Casado: Open source creators must retain sole supplier status for pricing power
“If you've originated a project and you're bringing that to market, you should retain the ability to be the sole supplier, if only to set pricing and brand awareness in the market. Companies live or die by this type of thing.”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 12:02
Insight
Waters: Upselling support for active open source deployments is unsustainable
“If you're coming in and upselling support only, and they're already installed, And all you're upselling is the support model. That's going to be a lot more difficult because they already have it running. They already have it working at their scale. And all the…”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 13:18
Insight
Waters: Open source 'dog piles' destroy potential for $500M revenue
“If you're in an open source dog pile, as I mentioned in order of caution, it's especially rampant. That can actually drive your entire upside of ever being a half billion dollar a year software company. Like your probabilities go down really hard.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 14:27
Insight
Casado: Enterprise software sales faces a $30k to $150k 'valley of death'
“In direct enterprise software sales, it seems to be this valley of death between like, say, 30 K and a 150. If you're 20 K or below, you know, it, you can call somebody up and they can pay for it. And let's say if you're 200 K and above, then you have a hopes …”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 16:14
Insight
Waters: Enterprise software startups should target $400k to $1.5M annual contract values
“I think a hundred is too low. Like I would try to get to. 400 to 1.5. And the critical thing that happens at that is not that you extract more money. It's actually that you can be a better advisor. Like you can actually put talent on the ground and you'll find…”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 17:23
Insight
Waters: Open source companies fail by selling support instead of targeting C-level buyers
“So many open source companies have died because they transact around the edges with like director level or technician level with, for support. And they never got to the CTO, the CIO and true strategic account control like the big players had.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 18:07
Insight
Casado: Open source success is driven by developer shifts, not open source itself
“And the reason that we're seeing this rise in open source companies is not endemic to open source. It's the fact that we're seeing actually a transformation around developers and their aesthetic and the technologies.”
Martin Casado Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 19:44
Insight
Waters: High enterprise software pricing reflects outcomes and trust, not support
“It's expensive because you know, the trust model of enterprise buyers is you're really going to take care of them, advise them, ensure outcomes. You're not just providing support.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 20:57
Opinion
Waters: Red Hat benefited from a rare Unix-to-Linux platform shift
“Red Hat kinda got lucky and find a commoditizing change, which was Unix to Linux. That's an rare event to have a major, you know, chip system re platforming see change.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:15
Assertion Contradicted
Waters: Sun lost hundreds of millions overnight making OpenSolaris free
“Well, what happened was that overnight, like hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue evaporated.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 23:32
Insight
Waters: Open source communities must align with enterprise buyer priorities
“Community development's really important, but if you just develop a little community, and it doesn't change a CIO, a CTO, anyone that's writing as serious as checks priorities, like by definition, you didn't build a software company that had an opportunity to …”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 24:51
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Waters: Enterprise buyers use open source to guard against Oracle lock-in
“So what buyers are trying to escape from, and one reason they want open source as a Protective measure, even if they don't use it, is the right to keep using their software without paying more and more for it every year. Companies like Oracle have been out the…”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 26:28
Insight
Waters: Avoid founding closed-source software startups without a unique niche
“So I would probably not start a closed source software company today unless I had a very niche novel idea that I felt no one else would try to do because quickly there'll be an open source alternative to what you're trying to do if you do not open source it.”
James Waters Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 27:33
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.