Michèle Flournoy

6 statements across 1 episodes · 2 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 people on the record · first statement Jan 2, 2019 by Michelle Flournoy · said 17 times in 1 episodes since 2019 · across every show →

Mentions by year

brought up most by Matt Spence (7), Marc Andreessen (2)

tap a year for its mentions
001012012019episodesmentions
0112019episodes it came up in
00100.52012019episodesmentions per episode
2019 17 mentions in 1 episode

every mention, scene by scene, with the transcript →

Everything said about Michèle Flournoy, oldest first

Jan 2, 2019 positive
Opinion
Flournoy: A four-year defense budget deal is Congress's top security imperative
“I've come to believe that the most important thing the next Congress could do for U.S. National security is Is negotiate with the new administration at least a four-year budget deal that would create a predictable top line, that would end the threat of sequest…”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 25:36 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Jan 2, 2019 negative
Insight
Flournoy: Procuring IT like fighter jets guarantees technical obsolescence before deployment
“We cannot try to procure IT-driven solutions the way we procure aircraft carriers or fifth-generation fighter jets. It just doesn't work. It's a recipe for being obsolete before you even fully feel the capability.”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 24:12 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Jan 2, 2019 negative
Insight
Flournoy: Policy frameworks have lagged far behind cyber technology
“In my view, the policy and concept development side of the conversation has not kept pace with the technology and what we're actually experiencing in terms of cyber activity, and so we really don't have a conceptual frame for thinking about how to respond.”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 6:39 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Jan 2, 2019 bearish
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Flournoy: U.S. risks losing military technological superiority within 10 to 15 years
“If we continue on that road, we will not Keep our military technological edge. The next 10 to 15 years is the critical period that will determine whether the US maintains that as an unbelievably valuable asset or whether we lose it in some areas.”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 26:08 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Jan 2, 2019 positive
Opinion
Flournoy: U.S. military edge requires partnership with the tech industry
“To me, this is probably one of the most important challenges we're going to have to deal with, and you can't do it Without some kind of partnership with the tech world.”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 12:52 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Jan 2, 2019 negative
Insight
Flournoy: Policymakers misapply nuclear deterrence models to cyber threats
“Most of the policy makers don't fully understand The technology in detail, and so they can, they're tempted to apply previous frameworks in a way that doesn't really fit, like they'll, so they'll hearken back to the nuclear domain and, you know, concepts of es…”
Michelle Flournoy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 6:58 a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.