“To me, this is probably one of the most important challenges we're going to have to deal with, and you can't do it Without some kind of partnership with the tech world.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Michelle Flournoy
AssertionSupported
Flournoy: US intelligence community agrees Russia directed WikiLeaks releases
“It's pretty accepted now from the intelligence community community that these leaks were directed by Russia.”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 5:27a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Insight
Flournoy: Policymakers misapply nuclear deterrence models to cyber threats
“Most of the policy makers don't fully understand The technology in detail, and so they can, they're tempted to apply previous frameworks in a way that doesn't really fit, like they'll, so they'll hearken back to the nuclear domain and, you know, concepts of es…”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 6:58a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
AssertionPartly supported
Flournoy: South Korea pays over half of US troop stationing costs
“Korea pays more than 50% of the cost of our troops there.”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 14:19a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
PredictionNot checkable as stated
Flournoy: US ethical debates on AI military tech will be bypassed by adversaries
“I also think in this country, we are likely to have important ethical debates about things like fully autonomous military systems, or The use of genetic modification to create sort of superhuman capabilities and soldiers or what have you in a way that may be t…”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 19:02a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Opinion
Flournoy: A four-year defense budget deal is Congress's top security imperative
“I've come to believe that the most important thing the next Congress could do for U.S. National security is Is negotiate with the new administration at least a four-year budget deal that would create a predictable top line, that would end the threat of sequest…”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 25:36a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
PredictionNot checkable as stated
Flournoy: U.S. risks losing military technological superiority within 10 to 15 years
“If we continue on that road, we will not Keep our military technological edge. The next 10 to 15 years is the critical period that will determine whether the US maintains that as an unbelievably valuable asset or whether we lose it in some areas.”
Michelle FlournoyJan 2, 2019▶ 26:08a16z Podcast | What's Next for Technology and National Security?
Made with StarZero
Turn any episode into a week of clips.
This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.