The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jenna Brown no published score: only 2 usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
2on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Kind of inherent within kind of choosing an investor, though, there's the often troublesome decision for founders over taking operator VC money versus invest Investor VC money. Now, being an investor VC, I would add to your answer on one side, but where did your decision fall on this, and what was the thesis behind this decision?

A Yeah, so we did take money from both, and I'd say this, we love taking money from ex-founders, because typically they're great at practical advice. How to practically hire, practically build a product plan, practically go and close that monster sale. They've been there, and they've had to go through that experience themselves. I'd say non-former founders, they also can be incredibly valuable. I just ask them a different set of questions. And I'd say the only thing to be careful as is what I think is not good is when you have someone who hasn't worked or run in a very small company, heavily giving you that practical advice, because there tends to be a lot of context that they miss. And so that advice can be wrong. And, and we, we've seen that and also taken some of that advice.

AI assessment note: “Yeah, so we did take money from both, and I'd say this”

Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Kind of inherent within kind of choosing an investor, though, there's the often troublesome decision for founders over taking operator VC money versus invest Investor VC money. Now, being an investor VC, I would add to your answer on one side, but where did your decision fall on this, and what was the thesis behind this decision?

A Yeah, so we did take money from both, and I'd say this, we love taking money from ex-founders, because typically they're great at practical advice. How to practically hire, practically build a product plan, practically go and close that monster sale. They've been there, and they've had to go through that experience themselves. I'd say non-former founders, they also can be incredibly valuable. I just ask them a different set of questions. And I'd say the only thing to be careful as is what I think is not good is when you have someone who hasn't worked or run in a very small company, heavily giving you that practical advice, because there tends to be a lot of context that they miss. And so that advice can be wrong. And, and we, we've seen that and also taken some of that advice.

AI assessment note: “we did take money from both, and I'd say this, we love taking money”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.