Jul 13, 2016 · 24m · 20vc

20VC: USV's Brad Burnham on Co-Founding USV with Fred Wilson, What They Look For In Potential Partners & Whether We Are Entering a Period of Consolidation or Expansion

Brad Burnham · 17m spoken Harry Stebbings · 6m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Brad Burnham, co-founder of Union Square Ventures. Burnham discusses the founding history of USV, their thesis-driven investment philosophy, board stewardship, partnership culture, and perspectives on tech market cycles and consolidation.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 26.4% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 1.7 Guest teaching 2.7 Guest disagreement 0.8 Harry pushing back 1.0
05100:0010:0020:002:24–5:12 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Brad Burnham's Path to Venture Capital and Founding USV Harry introduces Brad and asks standard setup questions regarding his career path and the founding of USV. Brad provides a conversational narrative about AT&T Ventures and meeting Fred Wilson without any dynamic tension.5:13–8:24 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Building the USV Partnership and Cultivating Team Culture Harry asks an open-ended question about character traits looked for in partners. Brad explains the deliberate, slow process of adding partners like Albert Wenger and Andy Weissman in a completely collaborative tone.8:24–15:12 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Defining the Qualities of Exceptional Board Members Harry demonstrates research by citing USV analyst Joel Monegro and Mark Twain on market cycles, pushing Brad directly to agree on whether tech is in a consolidation phase. Brad provides detailed historical analysis of 1990s hardware VC vs 2000s application layer investing.15:12–17:19 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 The Strategic Advantages of Thesis-Driven Venture Investing Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal for early stage startups. Brad mildly rejects the premise, clarifying that while it worked for USV in the application layer, it may not be universally optimal across all VC sectors.17:19–20:06 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Major USV Inflection Points and the VC Learning Curve Harry asks about key inflection points for USV. Brad humbly notes that venture capital firms often receive too much sustained credit for a single great fund (their 2004 fund) from ten years prior.20:07–23:12 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Quick-Fire Insights with USV Co-Founder Brad Burnham Harry runs a friendly quick-fire round where Brad candidly admits to reading academic papers over blogs and explains the rationale behind his OB-One investment.2:24–5:12 · Guest teaching 1/10 Brad Burnham's Path to Venture Capital and Founding USV Harry introduces Brad and asks standard setup questions regarding his career path and the founding of USV. Brad provides a conversational narrative about AT&T Ventures and meeting Fred Wilson without any dynamic tension.5:13–8:24 · Guest teaching 2/10 Building the USV Partnership and Cultivating Team Culture Harry asks an open-ended question about character traits looked for in partners. Brad explains the deliberate, slow process of adding partners like Albert Wenger and Andy Weissman in a completely collaborative tone.8:24–15:12 · Guest teaching 4/10 Defining the Qualities of Exceptional Board Members Harry demonstrates research by citing USV analyst Joel Monegro and Mark Twain on market cycles, pushing Brad directly to agree on whether tech is in a consolidation phase. Brad provides detailed historical analysis of 1990s hardware VC vs 2000s application layer investing.15:12–17:19 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Strategic Advantages of Thesis-Driven Venture Investing Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal for early stage startups. Brad mildly rejects the premise, clarifying that while it worked for USV in the application layer, it may not be universally optimal across all VC sectors.17:19–20:06 · Guest teaching 3/10 Major USV Inflection Points and the VC Learning Curve Harry asks about key inflection points for USV. Brad humbly notes that venture capital firms often receive too much sustained credit for a single great fund (their 2004 fund) from ten years prior.20:07–23:12 · Guest teaching 2/10 Quick-Fire Insights with USV Co-Founder Brad Burnham Harry runs a friendly quick-fire round where Brad candidly admits to reading academic papers over blogs and explains the rationale behind his OB-One investment.2:24–5:12 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Brad Burnham's Path to Venture Capital and Founding USV Harry introduces Brad and asks standard setup questions regarding his career path and the founding of USV. Brad provides a conversational narrative about AT&T Ventures and meeting Fred Wilson without any dynamic tension.5:13–8:24 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Building the USV Partnership and Cultivating Team Culture Harry asks an open-ended question about character traits looked for in partners. Brad explains the deliberate, slow process of adding partners like Albert Wenger and Andy Weissman in a completely collaborative tone.8:24–15:12 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Defining the Qualities of Exceptional Board Members Harry demonstrates research by citing USV analyst Joel Monegro and Mark Twain on market cycles, pushing Brad directly to agree on whether tech is in a consolidation phase. Brad provides detailed historical analysis of 1990s hardware VC vs 2000s application layer investing.15:12–17:19 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Strategic Advantages of Thesis-Driven Venture Investing Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal for early stage startups. Brad mildly rejects the premise, clarifying that while it worked for USV in the application layer, it may not be universally optimal across all VC sectors.17:19–20:06 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Major USV Inflection Points and the VC Learning Curve Harry asks about key inflection points for USV. Brad humbly notes that venture capital firms often receive too much sustained credit for a single great fund (their 2004 fund) from ten years prior.20:07–23:12 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Quick-Fire Insights with USV Co-Founder Brad Burnham Harry runs a friendly quick-fire round where Brad candidly admits to reading academic papers over blogs and explains the rationale behind his OB-One investment.2:24–5:12 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Brad Burnham's Path to Venture Capital and Founding USV Harry introduces Brad and asks standard setup questions regarding his career path and the founding of USV. Brad provides a conversational narrative about AT&T Ventures and meeting Fred Wilson without any dynamic tension.5:13–8:24 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Building the USV Partnership and Cultivating Team Culture Harry asks an open-ended question about character traits looked for in partners. Brad explains the deliberate, slow process of adding partners like Albert Wenger and Andy Weissman in a completely collaborative tone.8:24–15:12 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Defining the Qualities of Exceptional Board Members Harry demonstrates research by citing USV analyst Joel Monegro and Mark Twain on market cycles, pushing Brad directly to agree on whether tech is in a consolidation phase. Brad provides detailed historical analysis of 1990s hardware VC vs 2000s application layer investing.15:12–17:19 · Harry pushing back 1/10 The Strategic Advantages of Thesis-Driven Venture Investing Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal for early stage startups. Brad mildly rejects the premise, clarifying that while it worked for USV in the application layer, it may not be universally optimal across all VC sectors.17:19–20:06 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Major USV Inflection Points and the VC Learning Curve Harry asks about key inflection points for USV. Brad humbly notes that venture capital firms often receive too much sustained credit for a single great fund (their 2004 fund) from ten years prior.20:07–23:12 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Quick-Fire Insights with USV Co-Founder Brad Burnham Harry runs a friendly quick-fire round where Brad candidly admits to reading academic papers over blogs and explains the rationale behind his OB-One investment.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 83.6% · guest 16.4%0:00 · Harry 83.6% · guest 16.4%3:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%3:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%6:00 · Harry 6.8% · guest 93.2%6:00 · Harry 6.8% · guest 93.2%9:00 · Harry 12.8% · guest 87.2%9:00 · Harry 12.8% · guest 87.2%12:00 · Harry 16.8% · guest 83.2%12:00 · Harry 16.8% · guest 83.2%15:00 · Harry 18% · guest 82%15:00 · Harry 18% · guest 82%18:00 · Harry 13.3% · guest 86.7%18:00 · Harry 13.3% · guest 86.7%21:00 · Harry 31.6% · guest 68.4%21:00 · Harry 31.6% · guest 68.4%24:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%24:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 15:24 Brad pushes back on 'optimal' premise

When Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal, Brad gently rejects the absolute framing by stating he does not know if it is optimal, only that it worked specifically for USV's focus on the application layer.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 14:35 Harry presses Brad to take a stand on tech consolidation

Harry steps beyond asking open questions to directly prompt Brad to take a clear stance on whether he agrees that tech is in a continued phase of consolidation.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 10:03 Brad explains the shift from 90s hardware VC to application layer

Brad provides a masterclass on how 1990s hardware VC models failed when applied directly to 2000s web application startups, illustrating how VCs must evaluate market shifts from first principles.

Harry holds his own ▶ 9:40 Harry quotes USV research to challenge Brad on market cycles

Harry demonstrates strong preparation and industry knowledge by quoting USV analyst Joel Monegro's research on Mark Twain's market cycle analogy to lead into tech adoption trends.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Brad Burnham's Path to Venture Capital and Founding USV 1100 Harry introduces Brad and asks standard setup questions regarding his career path and the founding of USV. Brad provides a conversational narrative about AT&T Ventures and meeting Fred Wilson without any dynamic tension.
Building the USV Partnership and Cultivating Team Culture 1200 Harry asks an open-ended question about character traits looked for in partners. Brad explains the deliberate, slow process of adding partners like Albert Wenger and Andy Weissman in a completely collaborative tone.
Defining the Qualities of Exceptional Board Members 3414 Harry demonstrates research by citing USV analyst Joel Monegro and Mark Twain on market cycles, pushing Brad directly to agree on whether tech is in a consolidation phase. Brad provides detailed historical analysis of 1990s hardware VC vs 2000s application layer investing.
The Strategic Advantages of Thesis-Driven Venture Investing 2421 Harry asks why thesis-driven investing is optimal for early stage startups. Brad mildly rejects the premise, clarifying that while it worked for USV in the application layer, it may not be universally optimal across all VC sectors.
Major USV Inflection Points and the VC Learning Curve 2311 Harry asks about key inflection points for USV. Brad humbly notes that venture capital firms often receive too much sustained credit for a single great fund (their 2004 fund) from ten years prior.
Quick-Fire Insights with USV Co-Founder Brad Burnham 1210 Harry runs a friendly quick-fire round where Brad candidly admits to reading academic papers over blogs and explains the rationale behind his OB-One investment.

Statements from this episode (13)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
USV Took 80 Pitch Meetings to Raise First Fund in 2004
“It took us about 80 meetings and a heck of a lot of air travel to get that done, but we finally got the fund done in the early part of, I guess, 2004”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 4:45
Disclosure
USV Created Venture Partner Role for Albert Wenger for Sourcing Etsy
“Been very actively involved in Etsy early on and brought Etsy to the partnership. And we created a venture partner role for Albert to, you know, to sort of compensate him for having brought Etsy to the partnership.”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 7:17
Prediction Held up
USV Will Add Partners Slowly and Remain in a Single Office
“It'll always be a slow process for us. We think these partnerships are, you know, the dynamics of the partnerships are very, very important, and we'll continue to, you know, as we Add people. We'll do it very slowly, and we'll do it in a single office, and we'…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 8:04
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Fred Wilson Managed Flatiron's Portfolio Post-Crash Into USV Launch
“Thing about Fred, most impressive things I've ever seen anybody do is the amount of effort that he put into managing out the Flatiron portfolio after the crash in 2000 which I got to watch, you know, up close and personal because he was very much still doing i…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 8:50
Insight
VCs Spend More Time on Struggling Startups Than Winners
“It turns out that this is probably a truism in the business that you end up investing more time in your losers than your winners.”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 9:12
Insight
Supporting Failing Startups Earns VCs Entry Into Future Winners
“And the willingness to do that is what gets you invited into the next winner.”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 9:25
Insight
Expecting Past VC Investment Models to Repeat Is a Major Failure Mode
“I think one of the failure modes of venture capital is to assume that the past is the future and that you'll consider it, can you continue to see the same models?”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 10:11
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Late-Stage Private Valuations Are Unsustainable and Face a Market Correction
“I'd argue it's probably not that healthy, and that you're actually seeing some very weird dislocations when, you know, the scarcity of equity in the private capital markets for the real dominant market players, you know, you end up bidding up the, in the price…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 12:57
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Big Tech Dominance Makes Creating New Consumer Web Unicorns Difficult
“We're now in a world where, you know, we're seeing really dominant market power, Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, you know, creating a new set of unicorns in the face of that market power is going to be very difficult, certainly in the consumer-facing web serv…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 14:04
Insight
Infrastructure VC Relies on IP; Application Layer Requires a Thesis
“When you move from the infrastructure layer, where I think Investing is really defined by technical differentiation and intellectual property defensibility. You know, they're, I think, being more opportunistic, more deal flow driven, made perfect sense. When y…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 15:32
Insight
Publicly Sharing Investment Theses Attracts Aligned Founders
“Putting that thesis out there and being open about it and being open about all of our thinking about markets has proven to be very helpful. Introducing us to entrepreneurs who are working in the areas that we have been thinking about.”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 16:08
Disclosure
USV Avoids Direct Competitors to Enable Peer Collaboration
“Because we make an effort not to invest in direct competitors, they, they're perfectly comfortable sharing ideas with each other. So we've been able to organize, you know, because we don't do biotech For instance, you know, we can have a CEO summit where every…”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 16:47
Assertion Partly supported
USV's 2004 Fund Had Four Investments Each Return the Full Fund
“We made investments in Zynga, Twitter, Indeed, and Etsy within about a six month period. In our 2004 fund, each of those returned the fund.”
Brad Burnham Jul 13, 2016 ▶ 17:46
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.