Nov 30, 2022 · 1h 16m · news
Jason Lemkin: Cold Email Tips; Why Only 15% of Founders Listen to their VCs | 20VC #954 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this deep-dive interview, SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin joins Harry Stebbings to dissect his legendary investment in Algolia, sharing critical insights on operator-led investing, VC fund math, cold email strategies, and the cold realities of LP fundraising.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 15.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Jason directly opposes Harry's insistence on aggressive board feedback, asserting that Harry and he are wrong and that giving unvarnished criticism permanently damages founder relationships 60% of the time.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 42:30 Harry rejecting passive board members and spineless VC cultureHarry vehemently rejects the idea of staying silent on boards to protect reputational positioning, passionately arguing that VCs have a fiduciary duty to deliver hard truths even if founders react poorly.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:10:40 Jason diagnosing Harry's operational bottleneck at 20VCJason candidly diagnoses Harry's key operational mistake, explaining that Harry is under-maximizing the 20VC empire by acting as a solo creator rather than building a team of four GMs to run distinct business units.
Harry holds his own ▶ 33:46 Harry exposing VC alignment incentives around zombie companiesHarry demonstrates sharp institutional expertise by reframing why zombie companies persist, pointing out that VCs do not face an existential crisis because they can collect fees while hiding stagnation from LPs.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples. | |
| Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career. | |
| Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs. | |
| Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays. | |
| Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous. | |
| Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor. | |
| Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal. | |
| Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe. | |
| Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development. | |
| The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency. | |
| Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market. | |
| Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders. | |
| Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional. | |
| LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes. | |
| You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics. | |
| Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing. | |
| Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained. | |
| Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers. | |
| Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them. |