Nov 30, 2022 · 1h 16m · news

Jason Lemkin: Cold Email Tips; Why Only 15% of Founders Listen to their VCs | 20VC #954 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Jason Lemkin · 58m spoken Harry Stebbings · 10m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this deep-dive interview, SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin joins Harry Stebbings to dissect his legendary investment in Algolia, sharing critical insights on operator-led investing, VC fund math, cold email strategies, and the cold realities of LP fundraising.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 15.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 3.2 Guest teaching 5.0 Guest disagreement 2.3 Harry pushing back 2.4
05100:0020:0040:001:00:000:49–4:24 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples.4:24–7:51 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career.7:51–12:36 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs.12:36–16:21 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays.16:21–18:39 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous.18:39–21:00 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor.21:00–24:55 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal.24:55–28:57 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe.28:57–32:15 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development.32:15–36:05 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency.36:05–38:11 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market.38:11–47:11 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders.47:11–51:53 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional.51:53–56:00 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes.56:00–58:22 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics.58:22–1:03:36 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing.1:03:36–1:07:17 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained.1:07:17–1:12:04 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers.1:12:04–1:16:11 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them.0:49–4:24 · Guest teaching 4/10 High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples.4:24–7:51 · Guest teaching 5/10 Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career.7:51–12:36 · Guest teaching 5/10 Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs.12:36–16:21 · Guest teaching 6/10 Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays.16:21–18:39 · Guest teaching 5/10 Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous.18:39–21:00 · Guest teaching 6/10 Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor.21:00–24:55 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal.24:55–28:57 · Guest teaching 5/10 Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe.28:57–32:15 · Guest teaching 5/10 Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development.32:15–36:05 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency.36:05–38:11 · Guest teaching 6/10 Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market.38:11–47:11 · Guest teaching 5/10 Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders.47:11–51:53 · Guest teaching 5/10 Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional.51:53–56:00 · Guest teaching 5/10 LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes.56:00–58:22 · Guest teaching 5/10 You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics.58:22–1:03:36 · Guest teaching 5/10 Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing.1:03:36–1:07:17 · Guest teaching 4/10 Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained.1:07:17–1:12:04 · Guest teaching 6/10 Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers.1:12:04–1:16:11 · Guest teaching 4/10 Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them.0:49–4:24 · Guest disagreement 1/10 High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples.4:24–7:51 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career.7:51–12:36 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs.12:36–16:21 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays.16:21–18:39 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous.18:39–21:00 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor.21:00–24:55 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal.24:55–28:57 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe.28:57–32:15 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development.32:15–36:05 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency.36:05–38:11 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market.38:11–47:11 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders.47:11–51:53 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional.51:53–56:00 · Guest disagreement 3/10 LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes.56:00–58:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics.58:22–1:03:36 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing.1:03:36–1:07:17 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained.1:07:17–1:12:04 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers.1:12:04–1:16:11 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them.0:49–4:24 · Harry pushing back 1/10 High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples.4:24–7:51 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career.7:51–12:36 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs.12:36–16:21 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays.16:21–18:39 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous.18:39–21:00 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor.21:00–24:55 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal.24:55–28:57 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe.28:57–32:15 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development.32:15–36:05 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency.36:05–38:11 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market.38:11–47:11 · Harry pushing back 7/10 Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders.47:11–51:53 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional.51:53–56:00 · Harry pushing back 3/10 LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes.56:00–58:22 · Harry pushing back 1/10 You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics.58:22–1:03:36 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing.1:03:36–1:07:17 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained.1:07:17–1:12:04 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers.1:12:04–1:16:11 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 22.9% · guest 77.1%0:00 · Harry 22.9% · guest 77.1%3:00 · Harry 10.1% · guest 89.9%3:00 · Harry 10.1% · guest 89.9%6:00 · Harry 5.7% · guest 94.3%6:00 · Harry 5.7% · guest 94.3%9:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%9:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%12:00 · Harry 11.1% · guest 88.9%12:00 · Harry 11.1% · guest 88.9%15:00 · Harry 9.1% · guest 90.9%15:00 · Harry 9.1% · guest 90.9%18:00 · Harry 11% · guest 89%18:00 · Harry 11% · guest 89%21:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%21:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%24:00 · Harry 10.5% · guest 89.5%24:00 · Harry 10.5% · guest 89.5%27:00 · Harry 8.3% · guest 91.7%27:00 · Harry 8.3% · guest 91.7%30:00 · Harry 18.7% · guest 81.3%30:00 · Harry 18.7% · guest 81.3%33:00 · Harry 35.7% · guest 64.3%33:00 · Harry 35.7% · guest 64.3%36:00 · Harry 8.4% · guest 91.6%36:00 · Harry 8.4% · guest 91.6%39:00 · Harry 8.3% · guest 91.7%39:00 · Harry 8.3% · guest 91.7%42:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%42:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%45:00 · Harry 24.6% · guest 75.4%45:00 · Harry 24.6% · guest 75.4%48:00 · Harry 14.5% · guest 85.5%48:00 · Harry 14.5% · guest 85.5%51:00 · Harry 11.6% · guest 88.4%51:00 · Harry 11.6% · guest 88.4%54:00 · Harry 16.9% · guest 83.1%54:00 · Harry 16.9% · guest 83.1%57:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%57:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%1:00:00 · Harry 8.5% · guest 91.5%1:00:00 · Harry 8.5% · guest 91.5%1:03:00 · Harry 23% · guest 77%1:03:00 · Harry 23% · guest 77%1:06:00 · Harry 20% · guest 80%1:06:00 · Harry 20% · guest 80%1:09:00 · Harry 4.9% · guest 95.1%1:09:00 · Harry 4.9% · guest 95.1%1:12:00 · Harry 23.8% · guest 76.2%1:12:00 · Harry 23.8% · guest 76.2%1:15:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%1:15:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 43:00 Jason telling Harry he is wrong about delivering hard board feedback

Jason directly opposes Harry's insistence on aggressive board feedback, asserting that Harry and he are wrong and that giving unvarnished criticism permanently damages founder relationships 60% of the time.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 42:30 Harry rejecting passive board members and spineless VC culture

Harry vehemently rejects the idea of staying silent on boards to protect reputational positioning, passionately arguing that VCs have a fiduciary duty to deliver hard truths even if founders react poorly.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:10:40 Jason diagnosing Harry's operational bottleneck at 20VC

Jason candidly diagnoses Harry's key operational mistake, explaining that Harry is under-maximizing the 20VC empire by acting as a solo creator rather than building a team of four GMs to run distinct business units.

Harry holds his own ▶ 33:46 Harry exposing VC alignment incentives around zombie companies

Harry demonstrates sharp institutional expertise by reframing why zombie companies persist, pointing out that VCs do not face an existential crisis because they can collect fees while hiding stagnation from LPs.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
High-Velocity Inbounds: What Makes a Cold Email Stand Out 2411 Harry asks standard interview questions about inbound deal flow mechanics and email formatting. Jason reframes cold email expectations by explaining how pitch emails reveal founder communication skills, citing positive and negative examples.
Valuation Sensitivity: Jason’s Second Venture Investment in Algolia 2522 Harry prompts for exact valuation and check size figures for the Algolia deal. Jason educates on early seed valuation mistakes and YC allocation dynamics, admitting he optimized for small exit downside protection early in his career.
Risk Tolerance: Learning to Lose Money in Venture Capital 4534 Harry asks a sharp question challenging whether high-ownership seed deals suffer from adverse selection. Jason dismisses the adverse selection argument as psychological melodrama and outlines the mathematical necessity of high ownership for solo GPs.
Betting on What You Know: Solving Real Operator Pain 3622 Harry guides the discussion around moving from founder to VC. Jason explains how personal operator pain points drove his best early seed bets and asserts that operator-turned-VCs have a strict two-year window before domain insight decays.
Existential Decay: How VCs Stay Fresh and Relive Pain 3522 Harry asks how investors can preserve their edge and stay close to operator pain. Jason candidly argues that investor decay is permanent and that anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenuous.
Operator to VC: Two Crucial Rules for the First Year 2621 Harry asks for first-year advice for operator VCs. Jason outlines two rules, highlighting why traditional VCs do not understand the necessity of investing in founders who are demonstrably better than the investor.
Navigating Competition: Why Great Founders Respect Their Rivals 3522 Harry asks about competing with free open-source software and how founders should frame competitive landscapes. Jason critiques standard 2x2 competitive matrices as throwaway slides and highlights respect for rivals as a key founder signal.
Avoiding Lazy VC-Isms: The "Why Wouldn't Salesforce Build This?" Question 3533 Harry brings up race-to-the-bottom dynamics in commoditized software. Jason counters by calling commoditization and incumbent threats lazy VC tropes that cause investors to miss outlier deals like Stripe.
Iteration Velocity: The Compounding Effect of Rapid Shipping 3523 Harry prompts with a counterexample about pre-PMF product crafting (citing Figma). Jason insists that rapid shipping velocity and fast customer feedback cycles outweigh prolonged stealth development.
The Zombie Epidemic: Pre-Product-Market Fit Over-Funding 5423 Harry offers clear insight into VC incentives around zombie companies, observing that long runways allow VCs to protect fee streams and defer write-downs. Jason agrees and details how overfunded pre-PMF startups lose urgency.
Rethinking TAM: Why Early Hypergrowth Proves Market Size 2621 Harry asks about Algolia's apparently small $2M initial market size. Jason explains his practical approach to TAM calculation, arguing that sustained early hypergrowth mathematically disproves a small market.
Why Startups Plateau: Sticking with the 1.0 Management Team Too Long 5557 Harry forcefully pushes back against investors who avoid delivering harsh board feedback, calling out spinelessness. Jason strongly counters that providing unvarnished critical feedback permanently damages relationships with 60% of founders.
Solo GPs vs. Partnerships: Conviction and Decision-Making 3522 Harry probes the decision-making efficacy of multi-partner VC firms versus solo GPs. Jason explains why venture partnerships larger than two people become inherently dysfunctional.
LP Realities: Understating Venture Multiples and the Flight to Trust 5533 Harry quotes Semil Shah on LP turnover and pushes back on absurd fund return expectations. Jason breaks down the reality of institutional returns, explaining why 3x net is exceptional and beats competing asset classes.
You Are the Product: The Cold Reality of LP Diligence 2511 Harry asks Jason to clarify his phrase 'you are the product' regarding GP fundraising. Jason shares a memorable story from an early LP pitch to demonstrate that LPs evaluate funds strictly by return metrics.
Cutting Corners: Postmortems on Bubble-Era Investing 4523 Harry candidly shares his biggest investment failure with Airlift in Pakistan due to lack of local due diligence. Jason reflects on cutting corners during the market boom and the loss of relationship trust in remote investing.
Brand Equity: Moving with Platforms from Blogs to TikTok 4423 Harry shares his fear of being displaced by a new generation of creator-investors on platforms like TikTok. Jason explains how enduring personal brands survive platform shifts if core distribution channels are maintained.
Scaling the Empire: Jason's Feedback on the 20VC Platform 3632 Harry asks Jason for candid operational advice on 20VC. Jason delivers a sharp critique, telling Harry that he is under-maximizing his media platform by failing to hire a deep executive team of general managers.
Quickfire: Algolia Postmortem, Underrated Backers, and the Future of Search 3421 Harry conducts a quickfire round covering premortems, underrated investors, and future market outlooks. Jason dismisses premortems, asserting that B2B startups are resilient and rarely die unless founders abandon them.

Statements from this episode (51)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Stebbings: Wearing a hat increased 20VC video engagement by 28%
“Fun fact, we got 28% higher engagement because of the hat.”
Harry Stebbings Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 0:32
Disclosure
Lemkin: Every successful venture investment came from inbound emails
“I only invest from inbound Saster super fans. Every deal I've tried to go out and get, I've failed. I do nothing outbound. Every warm referral doesn't work out. Nothing works out except the high velocity inbound email.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 0:58
Insight
Lemkin: A founder's capability can be evaluated solely from their cold email
“The best founders are great communicators one way or the other. Right. And so if you can write an incredible cold email, like an incredible inbound email you can judge a human being and a company just from that email.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 2:35
Disclosure
Lemkin: Decided to invest in all initial unicorns before meeting them
“I already wanted to invest before I met all of my initial unicorns.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 3:48
Assertion Partly supported
Lemkin: Pipedrive Sold to Vista Equity Partners for $1.5B Cash
“The first one was pipe drive. They sold for 1.5 billion cash to Vista last year.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 4:50
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lemkin: Algolia Is Worth $3B and Would Have IPO'd in Better Markets
“I'll go like today's worth three billion probably would be IPO and if it wasn't for the markets”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 4:56
Disclosure
Lemkin: Invested $500K in Algolia's Seed at $12M Pre and $3.5M in Series A
“I did only 500 K in the first round and I bought up in the next. I did three and a half million in the A. So I did 500 K in the seed at 12 pre.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 6:57
Disclosure
Lemkin: Went five to six years in venture without losing money
“I didn't even lose any money for five or six years.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 8:12
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: Emergence Capital's fund backing EchoSign returned 12x
“I was in emergence too. That's like a 12 X fund.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 8:45
What-if
Lemkin: Would pass on early Algolia deal today over ownership
“First of all, I would have done the million at 15 in a heartbeat, right? And that would have been my bare minimum of investment, right? Because then I would have owned eight percent or something in the company. And no, I would have passed on it.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 9:35
Assertion Contradicted
Lemkin: Majority of his portfolio companies have female CEOs
“The majority of the companies I've invested in have a woman CEO”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 10:08
Insight
Lemkin: Small VC funds need one real unicorn annually with high ownership
“If your fund size isn't huge to win in venture, like you need a real unicorn a year with large ownership and the math is magical.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 12:27
Prediction Open · timeframe Nov 2025
Lemkin: Maestro QA will reach a $1 billion valuation
“I invested Maestro QA, which will be worth a billion in the not too distant future.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 13:53
Insight
Lemkin: New operator-VCs should invest in five pain-point startups initially
“Invest in like five companies your first year that are your top problems, where you have this special insight, and you'll know who the best founders are in that space too, because they can't bullshit you.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 15:09
Insight
Lemkin: Operator-VCs have only two years to leverage prior operational insight
“As folks that have gone from CEO to VC, you got about two years before you'll understand the problem, right? You'll understand the problem, but not necessarily what's next generation, right?”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 15:55
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lemkin: SaaStr Will Generate $40 Million in Revenue in 2022
“So Sastro Inc. Will do forty million this year.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 18:01
Insight
Lemkin: VCs Who Ignore Aging Out Turn Into Fee-Milking Funds
“You get like, you age out of a lot of things in venture. You really do. And if you're not honest about it, I think you're used to end up in a fee milking vehicle.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 18:32
Insight
Lemkin: New Operator-VCs Should Ignore Advice to Slow Down and Invest Aggressively
“Don't listen to the advice to slow it down, right? If you join a larger fund, their incentives are different than yours, right? You're new, the ball is set. They're just hoping, a large fund is hoping in the next two years you find one notion, that's all they …”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 18:59
Insight
Lemkin: Operator-VCs Should Only Invest in CEOs Better Than Themselves
“You have to invest in CEOs that were better than you. If you know the problem, if I know, if I'm a podcaster and I know Riverside or whatever the other versions are, and I look, Riverside's great. We're on it today. And you meet the CEO who I don't know, and h…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 19:58
Disclosure
Lemkin: Algolia Investment Was Made Despite Unanimous Rejection From Partners
“Algolia, and again, this was the first venture investment I did when it was unanimously no, and I still did it, but the founders were clearly better than me. The traction was better than I had. The understanding of the problem was better than I had as a founde…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 20:25
Insight
Lemkin: Early traction against free open source is the ultimate signal
“There's probably no better signal than when you compete with a free open source platform and your product is exploding, even at an early day, because it's gotta be magical.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 22:06
Insight
Lemkin: Pitch deck two-by-two competitive matrix slides waste time
“Most of those two by two matrices are throwaway slides. Don't have a throwaway slide. Don't have, it's a, it not only is it a waste of everyone's time, but it makes you look less than great if you have a throwaway slide.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 22:59
Disclosure
Lemkin: Invested in Salesloft pre-revenue before $2.5B acquisition
“I was involved, invested in sales loft pre-revenue, right? We sold for two and a half billion last year.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 27:23
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: Outreach is valued at $4 billion
“Sales loft and outreach outreach is worth four billion.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 27:30
Prediction Open · timeframe Nov 2027
Lemkin: Overfunded pre-PMF SaaS startups will all fail
“I don't see any way any of them succeed.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 32:47
Insight
Lemkin: Early startup hypergrowth always proves a large TAM exists
“What I have learned is that, you know, hypergrowth in the early days can decay for a variety of reasons, right? But it does prove you have a large TAM. It always proves to me that if you grow quickly in the early days, you have a large TAM, even if it looks sm…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 37:26
Assertion Partly supported
Lemkin: The e-signature software market has grown to $6 billion
“Even e-signature is not to talk too much about the old days, but like that was a one million dollar TAM, right? And today it's a six billion dollar business”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 37:47
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: 100% of SaaStr's unicorn portfolio companies experienced a plateau year
“Every single The company I've invested in every unit, true unicorn, a hundred million more revenue or billion more cash exit. All of them have had a plateau year all a hundred percent”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 38:30
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: Algolia's founder waited until $40M revenue to build an executive team
“Nicholas was very clear on this. He waited until forty million to build his first management team. That was way too long.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 38:52
Insight
Lemkin: Startups lose a year of progress with every bad VP hired
“You lose a year with every bad VP. You hire two bad VPs, you might lose a year and a half.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 39:30
Disclosure
Lemkin: Algolia co-founder stepped down near $100M ARR
“Nicholas did step down as they were approaching a hundred million and Bernadette took over.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 40:13
Insight
Lemkin: Only 15% of venture-backed founders can handle critical VC feedback
“Even of this Ivy League of venture-backed founders, I would say only maybe 15% really can take the feedback. And 25% will tolerate it, and then 60% will hate you for it. They hate you for it.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 43:40
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: Talkdesk was his third investment and reached a $10B valuation
“My third investment was talk desk, which is worth ten billion today.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 47:40
Insight
Lemkin: 'Conviction' in VC often justifies sloppy thinking
“One of the VCisms I hate is conviction. Right. Because conviction can justify so much sloppy thinking, but it doesn't mean it's wrong.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 47:57
Insight
Lemkin: VC partnerships with over two partners become dysfunctional
“So VCs are legal partnerships, but I think once they're beyond two, They become dysfunctional almost. They have to be dysfunctional. You start to lose or at a minimum, you're only there because of the fun size, because it, you lose all the benefits of a partne…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 49:10
What-if
Lemkin: Would have built legendary funds with a co-founding partner
“I would have been a much better investor with a partner than as a solo GP. I'll say it with a hundred percent certainty, a hundred percent. Sorry. I would have been better. I'm going to do fine. Don't get me wrong. No, no, I will do well, but I could have had …”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 50:01
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lemkin: LPs Will Drop Many VC Managers But Stay Committed to Venture
“Managers are going to get dropped. Don't get me wrong. Like it's going to be brutal. Right. But they're not going to not remain committed to the asset class.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 53:08
Assertion Partly supported
Lemkin: Andreessen Horowitz Has Generated 3.5x Blended Net Returns Historically
“If you look at the overall numbers for Andreessen, I'm shocked at how wildly successful Andreessen has been across these funds as they've grown. Wildly successful. That their blended returns are like, 3.5 X net after all these years.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 54:41
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lemkin: 3x Net VC Fund Returns Will Become Rare Again
“There's a reason three X net used to be rare until the boom. It's because that beats everything. Three X net beats every other asset class, except exhaust, except timber in good years or diamonds in odd years. Three X net beats everything. And three X net is u…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 55:11
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Lemkin: LP appetite for emerging VC managers could evaporate within 12 months
“I wouldn't be shocked if that evaporates in the next 12 months. If the appetite for the new, the next one just is, is gone. If it's just evaporates at the LP level”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 57:51
Disclosure
Stebbings: Pakistani startup Airlift was his biggest fund loss
“My biggest fuck up in this fund cycle was a company called Airlift in Pakistan. I thought I knew better. I analyzed the market to the end of the world, the opposite of FTX. I did more diligence than anyone could have done, and actually, I'd never been to Pakis…”
Harry Stebbings Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 58:30
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lemkin: Commits to never cutting due diligence corners again
“I will never cut a corner. I will never cut a corner again. And even though there are minor corners, I won't, I just won't do it. And it will impact investment velocity.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 59:39
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Lemkin: First founder-VC pitch meetings will never happen in person again
“Like the first meetings will never happen in person again, right? Even if you're in San Francisco, you're all in San Francisco, they'll never happen.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:00:51
Insight
Lemkin: Skipping early relationship building harms founder-VC trust during downturns
“When you build a relationship, it goes better, doesn't it? It goes better in the tough times. There's more honesty. There's less baloney. And so when we skip that step, We just never have that relationship”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:03:25
Insight
Lemkin: Subscale Brand Building in Venture Capital Is a Waste of Time
“Subscale brand building on VC is a waste of time.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:04:58
Disclosure
Lemkin: Half of Early SaaStr Deal Flow Came From Quora
“Half of my, probably my deal flow came from Quora in the early days.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:05:30
Assertion Contradicted
Lemkin: SaaStr Still Generates 500,000 Monthly Views on Quora
“And I'm still there by myself getting a half a million views a month”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:05:55
Insight
Lemkin: Top VC Brands Yield One to Two Quality Deals Annually
“If you have a top brand, you're going to get into one or two good deals a year by hook or by crook. If you play the game and it's enough, that's the beauty in venture.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:07:00
Insight
Lemkin: B2B SaaS startups only die when founders kill them
“I don't think, I don't, I think that only way a B to B startup dies is when the founders kill it.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:12:33
Disclosure
Lemkin: European VCs passed on Algolia at $12M pre-money valuation
“The other investors thought that fifty million was the highest outcome for Algolia. One of the reasons I was able to invest is because twelve million pre was too high for them. Because a fifty million dollar exit can't support anything much more than a five to…”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:13:00
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: Algolia's first executive team failed and nearly wrecked the company
“When that first management team, which because they had so much momentum, they recruited so late, right at 30 or forty million. When really none of that team worked out, it was, it almost wrecked the company.”
Jason Lemkin Nov 30, 2022 ▶ 1:14:31
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.