Nov 20, 2024 · 1h 4m · news

Cem Sertoglu: Lessons from the Greatest Venture Investment in European History | E1228 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Cem Sertoglu · 46m spoken Harry Stebbings · 12m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Cem Sertoglu, Managing Partner at Bek Ventures, shares his journey as a founder-turned-investor, detailing how his firm turned a $16.5 million fund into a $2.1 billion return through its historic early backing of UiPath while offering profound insights into boutique portfolio strategy, risk tolerance, and founder-investor alignment.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 21.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 3.9 Guest teaching 3.6 Guest disagreement 1.5 Harry pushing back 2.9
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:000:37–3:37 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Cem Sertoglu's Journey from Founder to Angel and Venture Capital Harry asks open-ended background questions on Cem's journey from founder to angel and VC. Cem provides a friendly overview of his thesis and career path without pushback from either side.3:37–5:43 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Venture Capital Dynamics in Regional Markets Harry brings up tourist capital dynamics from 2021 and asks whether Cem sits on the sidelines during market sprees. Cem explains how non-local VCs miss regional founder signaling nuances.5:43–9:43 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Myth of Commoditization in Early-Stage Venture Capital Harry cites Doug Leone to argue that venture is getting commoditized by multi-stage firms taking seed rounds. Cem directly disagrees with Leone's premise and argues that top founders seek co-founder-like alignment over pure cash.9:43–12:21 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 The Valuation Paradox and the Power Law in Action Harry presses on valuation discipline and mathematical impact on fund multiples. Cem illustrates the power law with UiPath, which returned 2.1 billion dollars from a 16.5 million dollar total outlay.12:21–15:39 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Missed Opportunities and Investment Prioritization Stack Harry directly challenges Cem for passing on Taxify's seed round due to take-rate concerns, arguing margin structures at seed do not matter. Harry backs his argument by citing his own pre-seed misses with Deel and Vanta.15:39–18:43 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Portfolio Concentration, Board Dynamics, and the Value of 'Care' Harry shares his own misstep passing on 11Labs over low ownership while discussing boutique firm differentiation. Cem explains why high partner concentration and care win against asset-manager VCs.18:43–23:28 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Scaling Challenges and Boardroom Quietness Harry asks about board mechanics and delicate founder communications when companies trail off sideways. Cem advocates for board quietness and disciplined preparation over constant vocal intervention.23:28–25:32 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 What VCs Really Sell: Time, Attention, and Capacity Harry offers direct pushback against board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and operate as marketing machines. Cem firmly rejects the framing, asserting VCs sell limited partner capacity and time.25:32–31:32 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Early Rounds, Manufactured Processes, and the Comfort of High Risk Harry discusses market dynamics like 100 million dollar seed rounds and pre-seed eradication. Cem re-educates on early-stage mechanics, framing seed investments as alignment call options rather than financial trades.31:32–36:06 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 GP Commitments, LP Alignment, and Regional vs. Global Risks Harry explores how LP alignment and GP commitments function for emerging vs established managers. Cem shares an insightful LP challenge regarding high GP commitments creating risk aversion and contrasts VC global tech exposure with regional PE risk.36:06–39:38 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Meeting Daniel and First Impressions of UiPath Harry asks Cem to recount meeting UiPath founder Daniel Dines for the first time. Cem recounts Daniel's initial technical focus, pragmatic mindset, and unpolished go-to-market storytelling.39:38–47:01 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Structuring the Seed, Bridge, and Later UiPath Rounds Harry presses Cem on check sizing and valuation negotiations across UiPath's seed, convertible bridge, and later rounds. Cem outlines the 14 VC rejections, the bridge valuation dispute, and underwriting 10 million dollars at a 1 billion dollar valuation.47:01–49:13 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Managing Liquidity: Secondary Sales and Divesting Post-IPO Harry inquires about liquidity discipline and strategic divestment. Cem details executing secondary sales at a premium to primary rounds and reducing holding prior to the public listing.49:13–52:45 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Venture Fund Structures, Succession, and UiPath Lessons Harry asks how successful VC partnerships prevent team decay and manage public stock holdings. Cem explains why firm edge decays post-IPO and advocates building long-term firm succession over a family office structure.52:45–56:03 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Rethinking Risk: Low Loss Ratios and Lessons from Failure Harry probes Cem's loss history and downside protection mindset. Cem reflects on Fund 1's low loss ratio (3 of 15 lost), admitting it indicated they took insufficient risk on higher-upside bets.56:03–59:07 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Navigating Follow-on Conviction and Cyclical Market Liquidity Harry predicts that most 2021 vintage funds will not achieve 1x returns due to closed M&A and IPO channels. Cem agrees that vintage is the primary driver of performance but emphasizes staying committed to core strategy.59:07–1:04:40 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 The AI Wave: Applied Software vs. Foundational Models Harry conducts a quickfire round covering AI application vs foundational models, cap table leverage, and investor role models. Cem highlights that founders severely underestimate their leverage on cap tables.0:37–3:37 · Guest teaching 1/10 Cem Sertoglu's Journey from Founder to Angel and Venture Capital Harry asks open-ended background questions on Cem's journey from founder to angel and VC. Cem provides a friendly overview of his thesis and career path without pushback from either side.3:37–5:43 · Guest teaching 3/10 Venture Capital Dynamics in Regional Markets Harry brings up tourist capital dynamics from 2021 and asks whether Cem sits on the sidelines during market sprees. Cem explains how non-local VCs miss regional founder signaling nuances.5:43–9:43 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Myth of Commoditization in Early-Stage Venture Capital Harry cites Doug Leone to argue that venture is getting commoditized by multi-stage firms taking seed rounds. Cem directly disagrees with Leone's premise and argues that top founders seek co-founder-like alignment over pure cash.9:43–12:21 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Valuation Paradox and the Power Law in Action Harry presses on valuation discipline and mathematical impact on fund multiples. Cem illustrates the power law with UiPath, which returned 2.1 billion dollars from a 16.5 million dollar total outlay.12:21–15:39 · Guest teaching 3/10 Missed Opportunities and Investment Prioritization Stack Harry directly challenges Cem for passing on Taxify's seed round due to take-rate concerns, arguing margin structures at seed do not matter. Harry backs his argument by citing his own pre-seed misses with Deel and Vanta.15:39–18:43 · Guest teaching 3/10 Portfolio Concentration, Board Dynamics, and the Value of 'Care' Harry shares his own misstep passing on 11Labs over low ownership while discussing boutique firm differentiation. Cem explains why high partner concentration and care win against asset-manager VCs.18:43–23:28 · Guest teaching 4/10 Scaling Challenges and Boardroom Quietness Harry asks about board mechanics and delicate founder communications when companies trail off sideways. Cem advocates for board quietness and disciplined preparation over constant vocal intervention.23:28–25:32 · Guest teaching 4/10 What VCs Really Sell: Time, Attention, and Capacity Harry offers direct pushback against board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and operate as marketing machines. Cem firmly rejects the framing, asserting VCs sell limited partner capacity and time.25:32–31:32 · Guest teaching 4/10 Early Rounds, Manufactured Processes, and the Comfort of High Risk Harry discusses market dynamics like 100 million dollar seed rounds and pre-seed eradication. Cem re-educates on early-stage mechanics, framing seed investments as alignment call options rather than financial trades.31:32–36:06 · Guest teaching 5/10 GP Commitments, LP Alignment, and Regional vs. Global Risks Harry explores how LP alignment and GP commitments function for emerging vs established managers. Cem shares an insightful LP challenge regarding high GP commitments creating risk aversion and contrasts VC global tech exposure with regional PE risk.36:06–39:38 · Guest teaching 3/10 Meeting Daniel and First Impressions of UiPath Harry asks Cem to recount meeting UiPath founder Daniel Dines for the first time. Cem recounts Daniel's initial technical focus, pragmatic mindset, and unpolished go-to-market storytelling.39:38–47:01 · Guest teaching 5/10 Structuring the Seed, Bridge, and Later UiPath Rounds Harry presses Cem on check sizing and valuation negotiations across UiPath's seed, convertible bridge, and later rounds. Cem outlines the 14 VC rejections, the bridge valuation dispute, and underwriting 10 million dollars at a 1 billion dollar valuation.47:01–49:13 · Guest teaching 4/10 Managing Liquidity: Secondary Sales and Divesting Post-IPO Harry inquires about liquidity discipline and strategic divestment. Cem details executing secondary sales at a premium to primary rounds and reducing holding prior to the public listing.49:13–52:45 · Guest teaching 4/10 Venture Fund Structures, Succession, and UiPath Lessons Harry asks how successful VC partnerships prevent team decay and manage public stock holdings. Cem explains why firm edge decays post-IPO and advocates building long-term firm succession over a family office structure.52:45–56:03 · Guest teaching 4/10 Rethinking Risk: Low Loss Ratios and Lessons from Failure Harry probes Cem's loss history and downside protection mindset. Cem reflects on Fund 1's low loss ratio (3 of 15 lost), admitting it indicated they took insufficient risk on higher-upside bets.56:03–59:07 · Guest teaching 3/10 Navigating Follow-on Conviction and Cyclical Market Liquidity Harry predicts that most 2021 vintage funds will not achieve 1x returns due to closed M&A and IPO channels. Cem agrees that vintage is the primary driver of performance but emphasizes staying committed to core strategy.59:07–1:04:40 · Guest teaching 3/10 The AI Wave: Applied Software vs. Foundational Models Harry conducts a quickfire round covering AI application vs foundational models, cap table leverage, and investor role models. Cem highlights that founders severely underestimate their leverage on cap tables.0:37–3:37 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Cem Sertoglu's Journey from Founder to Angel and Venture Capital Harry asks open-ended background questions on Cem's journey from founder to angel and VC. Cem provides a friendly overview of his thesis and career path without pushback from either side.3:37–5:43 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Venture Capital Dynamics in Regional Markets Harry brings up tourist capital dynamics from 2021 and asks whether Cem sits on the sidelines during market sprees. Cem explains how non-local VCs miss regional founder signaling nuances.5:43–9:43 · Guest disagreement 4/10 The Myth of Commoditization in Early-Stage Venture Capital Harry cites Doug Leone to argue that venture is getting commoditized by multi-stage firms taking seed rounds. Cem directly disagrees with Leone's premise and argues that top founders seek co-founder-like alignment over pure cash.9:43–12:21 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Valuation Paradox and the Power Law in Action Harry presses on valuation discipline and mathematical impact on fund multiples. Cem illustrates the power law with UiPath, which returned 2.1 billion dollars from a 16.5 million dollar total outlay.12:21–15:39 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Missed Opportunities and Investment Prioritization Stack Harry directly challenges Cem for passing on Taxify's seed round due to take-rate concerns, arguing margin structures at seed do not matter. Harry backs his argument by citing his own pre-seed misses with Deel and Vanta.15:39–18:43 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Portfolio Concentration, Board Dynamics, and the Value of 'Care' Harry shares his own misstep passing on 11Labs over low ownership while discussing boutique firm differentiation. Cem explains why high partner concentration and care win against asset-manager VCs.18:43–23:28 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Scaling Challenges and Boardroom Quietness Harry asks about board mechanics and delicate founder communications when companies trail off sideways. Cem advocates for board quietness and disciplined preparation over constant vocal intervention.23:28–25:32 · Guest disagreement 4/10 What VCs Really Sell: Time, Attention, and Capacity Harry offers direct pushback against board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and operate as marketing machines. Cem firmly rejects the framing, asserting VCs sell limited partner capacity and time.25:32–31:32 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Early Rounds, Manufactured Processes, and the Comfort of High Risk Harry discusses market dynamics like 100 million dollar seed rounds and pre-seed eradication. Cem re-educates on early-stage mechanics, framing seed investments as alignment call options rather than financial trades.31:32–36:06 · Guest disagreement 2/10 GP Commitments, LP Alignment, and Regional vs. Global Risks Harry explores how LP alignment and GP commitments function for emerging vs established managers. Cem shares an insightful LP challenge regarding high GP commitments creating risk aversion and contrasts VC global tech exposure with regional PE risk.36:06–39:38 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Meeting Daniel and First Impressions of UiPath Harry asks Cem to recount meeting UiPath founder Daniel Dines for the first time. Cem recounts Daniel's initial technical focus, pragmatic mindset, and unpolished go-to-market storytelling.39:38–47:01 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Structuring the Seed, Bridge, and Later UiPath Rounds Harry presses Cem on check sizing and valuation negotiations across UiPath's seed, convertible bridge, and later rounds. Cem outlines the 14 VC rejections, the bridge valuation dispute, and underwriting 10 million dollars at a 1 billion dollar valuation.47:01–49:13 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Managing Liquidity: Secondary Sales and Divesting Post-IPO Harry inquires about liquidity discipline and strategic divestment. Cem details executing secondary sales at a premium to primary rounds and reducing holding prior to the public listing.49:13–52:45 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Venture Fund Structures, Succession, and UiPath Lessons Harry asks how successful VC partnerships prevent team decay and manage public stock holdings. Cem explains why firm edge decays post-IPO and advocates building long-term firm succession over a family office structure.52:45–56:03 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Rethinking Risk: Low Loss Ratios and Lessons from Failure Harry probes Cem's loss history and downside protection mindset. Cem reflects on Fund 1's low loss ratio (3 of 15 lost), admitting it indicated they took insufficient risk on higher-upside bets.56:03–59:07 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Navigating Follow-on Conviction and Cyclical Market Liquidity Harry predicts that most 2021 vintage funds will not achieve 1x returns due to closed M&A and IPO channels. Cem agrees that vintage is the primary driver of performance but emphasizes staying committed to core strategy.59:07–1:04:40 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The AI Wave: Applied Software vs. Foundational Models Harry conducts a quickfire round covering AI application vs foundational models, cap table leverage, and investor role models. Cem highlights that founders severely underestimate their leverage on cap tables.0:37–3:37 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Cem Sertoglu's Journey from Founder to Angel and Venture Capital Harry asks open-ended background questions on Cem's journey from founder to angel and VC. Cem provides a friendly overview of his thesis and career path without pushback from either side.3:37–5:43 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Venture Capital Dynamics in Regional Markets Harry brings up tourist capital dynamics from 2021 and asks whether Cem sits on the sidelines during market sprees. Cem explains how non-local VCs miss regional founder signaling nuances.5:43–9:43 · Harry pushing back 5/10 The Myth of Commoditization in Early-Stage Venture Capital Harry cites Doug Leone to argue that venture is getting commoditized by multi-stage firms taking seed rounds. Cem directly disagrees with Leone's premise and argues that top founders seek co-founder-like alignment over pure cash.9:43–12:21 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Valuation Paradox and the Power Law in Action Harry presses on valuation discipline and mathematical impact on fund multiples. Cem illustrates the power law with UiPath, which returned 2.1 billion dollars from a 16.5 million dollar total outlay.12:21–15:39 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Missed Opportunities and Investment Prioritization Stack Harry directly challenges Cem for passing on Taxify's seed round due to take-rate concerns, arguing margin structures at seed do not matter. Harry backs his argument by citing his own pre-seed misses with Deel and Vanta.15:39–18:43 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Portfolio Concentration, Board Dynamics, and the Value of 'Care' Harry shares his own misstep passing on 11Labs over low ownership while discussing boutique firm differentiation. Cem explains why high partner concentration and care win against asset-manager VCs.18:43–23:28 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Scaling Challenges and Boardroom Quietness Harry asks about board mechanics and delicate founder communications when companies trail off sideways. Cem advocates for board quietness and disciplined preparation over constant vocal intervention.23:28–25:32 · Harry pushing back 6/10 What VCs Really Sell: Time, Attention, and Capacity Harry offers direct pushback against board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and operate as marketing machines. Cem firmly rejects the framing, asserting VCs sell limited partner capacity and time.25:32–31:32 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Early Rounds, Manufactured Processes, and the Comfort of High Risk Harry discusses market dynamics like 100 million dollar seed rounds and pre-seed eradication. Cem re-educates on early-stage mechanics, framing seed investments as alignment call options rather than financial trades.31:32–36:06 · Harry pushing back 3/10 GP Commitments, LP Alignment, and Regional vs. Global Risks Harry explores how LP alignment and GP commitments function for emerging vs established managers. Cem shares an insightful LP challenge regarding high GP commitments creating risk aversion and contrasts VC global tech exposure with regional PE risk.36:06–39:38 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Meeting Daniel and First Impressions of UiPath Harry asks Cem to recount meeting UiPath founder Daniel Dines for the first time. Cem recounts Daniel's initial technical focus, pragmatic mindset, and unpolished go-to-market storytelling.39:38–47:01 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Structuring the Seed, Bridge, and Later UiPath Rounds Harry presses Cem on check sizing and valuation negotiations across UiPath's seed, convertible bridge, and later rounds. Cem outlines the 14 VC rejections, the bridge valuation dispute, and underwriting 10 million dollars at a 1 billion dollar valuation.47:01–49:13 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Managing Liquidity: Secondary Sales and Divesting Post-IPO Harry inquires about liquidity discipline and strategic divestment. Cem details executing secondary sales at a premium to primary rounds and reducing holding prior to the public listing.49:13–52:45 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Venture Fund Structures, Succession, and UiPath Lessons Harry asks how successful VC partnerships prevent team decay and manage public stock holdings. Cem explains why firm edge decays post-IPO and advocates building long-term firm succession over a family office structure.52:45–56:03 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Rethinking Risk: Low Loss Ratios and Lessons from Failure Harry probes Cem's loss history and downside protection mindset. Cem reflects on Fund 1's low loss ratio (3 of 15 lost), admitting it indicated they took insufficient risk on higher-upside bets.56:03–59:07 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Navigating Follow-on Conviction and Cyclical Market Liquidity Harry predicts that most 2021 vintage funds will not achieve 1x returns due to closed M&A and IPO channels. Cem agrees that vintage is the primary driver of performance but emphasizes staying committed to core strategy.59:07–1:04:40 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The AI Wave: Applied Software vs. Foundational Models Harry conducts a quickfire round covering AI application vs foundational models, cap table leverage, and investor role models. Cem highlights that founders severely underestimate their leverage on cap tables.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 19.1% · guest 80.9%0:00 · Harry 19.1% · guest 80.9%3:00 · Harry 30.5% · guest 69.5%3:00 · Harry 30.5% · guest 69.5%6:00 · Harry 30.1% · guest 69.9%6:00 · Harry 30.1% · guest 69.9%9:00 · Harry 16.4% · guest 83.6%9:00 · Harry 16.4% · guest 83.6%12:00 · Harry 26.4% · guest 73.6%12:00 · Harry 26.4% · guest 73.6%15:00 · Harry 26.1% · guest 73.9%15:00 · Harry 26.1% · guest 73.9%18:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%18:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%21:00 · Harry 30.4% · guest 69.6%21:00 · Harry 30.4% · guest 69.6%24:00 · Harry 11.7% · guest 88.3%24:00 · Harry 11.7% · guest 88.3%27:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%27:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%30:00 · Harry 28.6% · guest 71.4%30:00 · Harry 28.6% · guest 71.4%33:00 · Harry 22.6% · guest 77.4%33:00 · Harry 22.6% · guest 77.4%36:00 · Harry 12.3% · guest 87.7%36:00 · Harry 12.3% · guest 87.7%39:00 · Harry 10.8% · guest 89.2%39:00 · Harry 10.8% · guest 89.2%42:00 · Harry 20.2% · guest 79.8%42:00 · Harry 20.2% · guest 79.8%45:00 · Harry 20.5% · guest 79.5%45:00 · Harry 20.5% · guest 79.5%48:00 · Harry 26.8% · guest 73.2%48:00 · Harry 26.8% · guest 73.2%51:00 · Harry 15.5% · guest 84.5%51:00 · Harry 15.5% · guest 84.5%54:00 · Harry 16.4% · guest 83.6%54:00 · Harry 16.4% · guest 83.6%57:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%57:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%1:00:00 · Harry 17.2% · guest 82.8%1:00:00 · Harry 17.2% · guest 82.8%1:03:00 · Harry 25.2% · guest 74.8%1:03:00 · Harry 25.2% · guest 74.8%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 5:54 Disagreeing with Doug Leone on VC commoditization

Cem explicitly rejects Doug Leone's quote and Harry's assertion that early-stage venture capital has become a commoditized, low-margin industry.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 22:48 Harry's pushback on cash as a commodity

Harry forcefully challenges Cem's philosophy of board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and function primarily as marketing machines.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 25:39 Reframing early rounds as alignment contracts

Cem re-educates Harry on early-stage valuation mechanics, explaining that seed checks are not financial trades but alignment constructs buying out-of-the-money call options.

Harry holds his own ▶ 13:22 Harry calling out seed stage unit economics concerns

Harry directly calls out Cem's take-rate and margin concerns on Taxify at Seed, sharing his own pre-seed misses like Deel and Vanta to prove founder quality trumps category logic.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Cem Sertoglu's Journey from Founder to Angel and Venture Capital 1100 Harry asks open-ended background questions on Cem's journey from founder to angel and VC. Cem provides a friendly overview of his thesis and career path without pushback from either side.
Venture Capital Dynamics in Regional Markets 3312 Harry brings up tourist capital dynamics from 2021 and asks whether Cem sits on the sidelines during market sprees. Cem explains how non-local VCs miss regional founder signaling nuances.
The Myth of Commoditization in Early-Stage Venture Capital 5445 Harry cites Doug Leone to argue that venture is getting commoditized by multi-stage firms taking seed rounds. Cem directly disagrees with Leone's premise and argues that top founders seek co-founder-like alignment over pure cash.
The Valuation Paradox and the Power Law in Action 4523 Harry presses on valuation discipline and mathematical impact on fund multiples. Cem illustrates the power law with UiPath, which returned 2.1 billion dollars from a 16.5 million dollar total outlay.
Missed Opportunities and Investment Prioritization Stack 5326 Harry directly challenges Cem for passing on Taxify's seed round due to take-rate concerns, arguing margin structures at seed do not matter. Harry backs his argument by citing his own pre-seed misses with Deel and Vanta.
Portfolio Concentration, Board Dynamics, and the Value of 'Care' 4312 Harry shares his own misstep passing on 11Labs over low ownership while discussing boutique firm differentiation. Cem explains why high partner concentration and care win against asset-manager VCs.
Scaling Challenges and Boardroom Quietness 4423 Harry asks about board mechanics and delicate founder communications when companies trail off sideways. Cem advocates for board quietness and disciplined preparation over constant vocal intervention.
What VCs Really Sell: Time, Attention, and Capacity 5446 Harry offers direct pushback against board quietness, arguing that VCs sell cash as a commodity and operate as marketing machines. Cem firmly rejects the framing, asserting VCs sell limited partner capacity and time.
Early Rounds, Manufactured Processes, and the Comfort of High Risk 4423 Harry discusses market dynamics like 100 million dollar seed rounds and pre-seed eradication. Cem re-educates on early-stage mechanics, framing seed investments as alignment call options rather than financial trades.
GP Commitments, LP Alignment, and Regional vs. Global Risks 4523 Harry explores how LP alignment and GP commitments function for emerging vs established managers. Cem shares an insightful LP challenge regarding high GP commitments creating risk aversion and contrasts VC global tech exposure with regional PE risk.
Meeting Daniel and First Impressions of UiPath 3301 Harry asks Cem to recount meeting UiPath founder Daniel Dines for the first time. Cem recounts Daniel's initial technical focus, pragmatic mindset, and unpolished go-to-market storytelling.
Structuring the Seed, Bridge, and Later UiPath Rounds 5524 Harry presses Cem on check sizing and valuation negotiations across UiPath's seed, convertible bridge, and later rounds. Cem outlines the 14 VC rejections, the bridge valuation dispute, and underwriting 10 million dollars at a 1 billion dollar valuation.
Managing Liquidity: Secondary Sales and Divesting Post-IPO 4402 Harry inquires about liquidity discipline and strategic divestment. Cem details executing secondary sales at a premium to primary rounds and reducing holding prior to the public listing.
Venture Fund Structures, Succession, and UiPath Lessons 4413 Harry asks how successful VC partnerships prevent team decay and manage public stock holdings. Cem explains why firm edge decays post-IPO and advocates building long-term firm succession over a family office structure.
Rethinking Risk: Low Loss Ratios and Lessons from Failure 4412 Harry probes Cem's loss history and downside protection mindset. Cem reflects on Fund 1's low loss ratio (3 of 15 lost), admitting it indicated they took insufficient risk on higher-upside bets.
Navigating Follow-on Conviction and Cyclical Market Liquidity 4313 Harry predicts that most 2021 vintage funds will not achieve 1x returns due to closed M&A and IPO channels. Cem agrees that vintage is the primary driver of performance but emphasizes staying committed to core strategy.
The AI Wave: Applied Software vs. Foundational Models 3312 Harry conducts a quickfire round covering AI application vs foundational models, cap table leverage, and investor role models. Cem highlights that founders severely underestimate their leverage on cap tables.

Statements from this episode (39)

Disclosure
Cem Sertoglu: Bek Ventures Fund 1 achieved 20x MOIC, 85% from UiPath
“The best single venture investment, you know, 16 and a half million investments that has brought us back to .1000000000 dollars in proceeds. So fund one is 20 time multiple on invested capital. 2.7 of that is non UiPath. So about 85% of the proceeds of fund on…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 0:00
Assertion Supported
Cem Sertoglu: UiPath grew $1M to $100M ARR in 21 months
“I believe a UiPath went from a million to a hundred million ARR in 21 months. At the time that was, I think, the fastest ever.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 0:18
Disclosure
Sertoglu estimates his overall angel investing track record yielded a 10x return
“I haven't done the math. I can get it to you later on, but it must have been about 10 X overall.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 2:43
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sertoglu: Foreign tourist capital repeatedly rushes into and retracts from regional markets
“It happens in every cycle they rush in and then they rush out very, very quickly. And also when they rush in, they miss, miss out on the nuances of the region.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 4:04
Opinion
Sertoglu: Early-stage VC cannot be commoditized or scaled with capital
“I don't think it is getting commoditized because it's limited. It's, you cannot scale it by just pouring money on it.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 6:24
Opinion
Stebbings: Founders prefer fast, hands-off capital over hands-on investor partners
“Honestly, founders want quick cash at a good price, and generally don't want someone to be involved too much, is what I see.”
Harry Stebbings Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 8:01
What-if
Sertoglu: Doubling UiPath's seed valuation would not have impacted fund returns
“For UiPath, if we'd done the seed round at twice the valuation, it wouldn't have really, you know, made a, made any difference. It would have still been a fantastic outcome.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 10:10
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Passing on Bolt's seed round was Bek Ventures' biggest loss
“I mean, one example that's probably our biggest loss is we met Bolt, the car ailing company, and they were called Taxify at the time, a small Baltics ride-hailing company, and even though, you know, Marcus, the founder, was extraordinary, we really couldn't se…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 12:31
Disclosure
Stebbings: I passed on pre-seed rounds for both Deel and Vanta
“I turned down Deal and Vanta at Preseed, and I did both the times because I knew the founders were amazing, but I just didn't like the business, I didn't like the category, something else other than the founder.”
Harry Stebbings Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 13:44
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Bek Ventures' early UiPath check returned 12.5x the entire fund
“In the case of UiPath, I mean, we thought it could return the fund. I mean, it has returned 12 and a half times the fund already, so that's been, you know, very miscalculated analysis, but we do do it.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 15:21
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Bek Ventures partners average one to two investments per year
“When you are a small partnership, I mean, in our firm for every fund, each partner writes about four or five checks per fund. So in kind of each vintage, we're talking each year, we're talking about one or two investments at most.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 16:00
What-if
Stebbings: Passing on a 2% stake in ElevenLabs was a major mistake
“My biggest mistakes, most recently, 11 Labs in particular, is where I was like, you got like two percent, and I was like, it's just not enough. And actually two percent would have been great in hindsight.”
Harry Stebbings Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 17:03
Insight
Sertoglu: Prematurely assuming product-market fit is the biggest scaling impediment
“I think the biggest impediment to that scale for some companies is assuming product market fit prematurely and being tempted into going into hyperscale mode prematurely.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 18:56
Insight
Sertoglu: Headcount is the easiest metric for startup founders to inflate
“First of all, ours is a, is an industry that fetishizes growth. And as you know, the easiest metric to grow for a founder is headcount.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 19:21
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sertoglu: Venture capital is the only asset class where assets choose investors
“You know, we're the only asset class where the asset chooses the investor, right?”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 21:00
Insight
Sertoglu: VCs sell time, attention, and portfolio capacity, not cash
“I think our, what we sell is not our cash. The cash is available. It's I mean, the seed and a rounds are flush with New capital coming in all the time. So I think what we sell is our time and attention and capacity, and we're selling one of those 20 slots in t…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 23:49
Insight
Sertoglu: Seed and Series A Rounds Are Alignment Contracts, Not Investments
“The early rounds are not real rounds. There are contracts where you're demonstrating alignment around, around a target that is very far out ahead. I mean, every early stage check, you're buying a very out of the money call option on these businesses. So it's n…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 25:59
Disclosure
Sertoglu: We intentionally disagree with founders during term sheets to test dynamics
“We usually try to disagree with the founders in the term sheet process at least once so that we kind of see the dynamics of what happens around that.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 27:05
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Bek Ventures Passed on Rushed Deals, Not High Valuations, in 2021
“In 2021, when the market was in a frenzy, we would never categorically pass on evaluation, so we've written very expensive checks in that period, but we would categorically pass on not having enough time to understand the business and digest the opportunity”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 28:15
Disclosure
Stebbings: $5M checks at $25M valuations were 20VC Fund 1's worst performers
“The worst performing segment of our seed portfolio on our farm one was five on 25, because they had too much money too soon, there was a lack of focus, a lack of urgency, and actually they struggled to raise their next round because it was already at too high …”
Harry Stebbings Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 29:22
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Bek Ventures partners committed nearly 10% to their $250M fund
“We think a lot about GP commitment size. We have a very high GP commitment in the fund, and what is it? It's close to 10% of a two hundred and fifty million dollar fund.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 32:02
Opinion
Sertoglu: Holding Emerging VC Managers to High GP Commitments Is Inexcusable
“I think that's inexcusable to hold a young emerging manager to that to that hurdle.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 33:26
Opinion
Sertoglu: Founders originating from Eastern Europe typically lack executive polish
“Our Eastern European-rooted founders are not polished.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 38:33
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sertoglu: Every single European VC passed on UiPath at least once
“I think that every single European VC has passed on UiPath at least once.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 41:30
Insight
Sertoglu: VC reserves exist for overlooked companies that defy standard molds
“And that's what we, that's what our reserves are for. Our reserves are for those companies that will be misunderstood by the market or overlooked by the market because they don't fit into the mold.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 41:55
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Earlybird passed on UiPath's $3B round and began divesting at $7B
“Then when Sequoia led the three billion dollar next round, we sat it out. We did not participate. And then when the seven billion valuation series C happened. Was it C or C or D? I can't remember. But then we started to carefully divest.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 46:24
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Earlybird sold UiPath secondaries at a premium to primary rounds
“I mean, our secondaries were all at a premium to the primary round. So there was, each round was so oversubscribed that we were able to actually sell at a premium our share class you know, shares that are at a lower class on the liquidation stack.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 47:44
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Earlybird returned 3-4x its fund via UiPath secondaries before IPO
“We were still the largest shareholder going into the IPO in the company but you know, we had also realized you know, already, I think Three, four times the fund at that point.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 48:16
Insight
Sertoglu: Early-stage VCs lose their edge once a startup goes public
“Once the stock is public, we felt that we have lost our entire edge in trying to Manage that investment. And I think as early stage investors, our job is to then leave that decision to our LPs.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 48:49
Assertion Supported
Sertoglu: 10-year fund life is too short for early-stage VC funds
“I think a 10 year life for a seed and a Focused fund is too short. This is evidenced by the fact that almost, I don't know a single early stage VC fund that was liquid by year 10.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 51:25
What-if
Sertoglu: Earlybird should have participated in Sequoia's $3B UiPath round
“In hindsight, we should have participated in that three billion dollar round by Sequoia.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 52:12
Disclosure
Sertoglu: Bek Ventures' Fund 1 returned capital on 12 of 15 deals
“In fund one out of 15 investments, only three of them did not return capital for us. Now, six companies are still live, but we expect to make money from all six of them, so they will not be lost. So we will have made A positive return out of, on 12 out of 15 i…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 53:04
Insight
Sertoglu: Downside protection terms like liquidation preferences are overrated
“I think it's overrated. You know, as I mentioned before, our deals, our investments, are not real investments the way you go by Apple shares on the stock market. They are long-term contracts around a vision, and ultimately it doesn't really move the needle tha…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 54:10
Disclosure
Earlybird Funded UiPath's Bridge Round When Other VC Funds Refused
“We've done, I mean, the bridge round at UiPath, no great fund was touching the company, and we had to build our conviction internally.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 56:30
Insight
Sertoglu: A VC Fund's Vintage Is the Single Biggest Predictor of Performance
“I think a very humbling fact is the biggest predictor of a fund's performance is its vintage.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 57:34
Prediction Open · timeframe Nov 2029
Sertoglu: The majority of 2021 vintage venture funds will not return 1x
“I haven't seen the underlying data. I would suspect that is probably the case. I, I'm afraid that is a right prediction.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 58:21
Disclosure
Sertoglu: All five recent Fund Three investments are AI companies
“So, of course, every investment we've made out of Fund Three, the last five investments, are all, in one way or another, AI companies.”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 59:24
Insight
Sertoglu: Founders underestimate cap table leverage and overnegotiate terms
“Founders usually underestimate the leverage they have on their cap table. They negotiate things for very obscure situations, etc. I think experienced founders know that it's their company, and they will have a lot of flexibility around managing things when it …”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 1:01:36
Insight
Sertoglu: Sign funding rounds if success probability increases beyond dilution
“For the founder, I think the most important thing is probability of success. You know, Is this round that I'm closing? Is this gonna impact my potential of getting where I want to get to? As a percentage, will it make up for the dilution I'm suffering? So if I…”
Cem Sertoglu Nov 20, 2024 ▶ 1:02:25

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ My $8BN miss 🤯 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings (@12:37) ▶ Best SaaS investment ever? 🚀💰 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings (@0:19) ▶ Crazy portfolio success rate 🤯💰 · 20VC with Harry Stebbing (@53:06) ▶ Do Founders underestimate their own power? 💪 · 20VC with Ha (@1:01:36)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.