May 22, 2025 · 1h 19m · 20vc
Rippling vs. Deel Lawsuit: WTF Happens Now? The Future of the Late Stage Private Market · 20VC with Harry Stebbings
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of 20VC, host Harry Stebbings joins guests Rory O'Driscoll and Jason Lemkin to analyze the shifting realities of late-stage venture capital, IPO structures, and corporate litigation like the Rippling vs. Deel dispute. They also explore how the rapid rise of AI is driving massive operational shifts, forcing venture capitalists to re-evaluate software defensibility and the future of traditional SaaS platforms.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 11.6% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Rory forcefully rejects Deel's legal positioning despite Harry being an investor, bluntly warning that escalating trade secret disputes risks criminal investigations.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 18:48 Harry challenges Rory's market framing using Klarna dataHarry directly refuses Rory's generalized IPO window framing by bringing up hard figures from his partner showing Klarna's growth deceleration and borrowing costs.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 29:22 Rory exposes Harry's secondary citation of Vencap LP dataWhen Harry cites Vencap LP data to make a point about exit sizes, Rory reveals he already requested and analyzed the raw dataset directly, playfully exposing Harry's surface-level prep.
Harry holds his own ▶ 18:48 Harry counters guest premise with proprietary internal analysisHarry demonstrates domain mastery by interjecting specific financial figures regarding Klarna's cost of capital and 13% growth rate to counter Rory's broader narrative.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chime S-1 Analysis and Business Model | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry opens by citing key Chime S-1 metric benchmarks like active user counts and primary account ratios. Rory educates the room on the mechanics of Durbin Amendment arbitrage and how small banks leverage debit card interchange fees. | |
| The Impact of Late-Stage Valuation Cuts and Ratchets | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | Harry references Sequoia's late-stage structure and General Atlantic's Shein deal protections. Rory overrides Jason's question to detail mandatory conversion terms and ratchet mechanics in late-stage filings. | |
| "Seed is for Suckers" and Late-Stage Investment Risk | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry questions when venture firms transition into playing an IRR risk game rather than capital loss risk. Rory and Jason explain why late-stage investors run on annual IRR while early-stage investors face write-off risks. | |
| The IPO Window and Public vs. Private Capital Choices | 7 | 4 | 2 | 7 | Harry forcefully pushes back on Rory's premise by citing his partner's data showing Klarna's growth decelerating to 13% alongside rising borrowing costs. Rory acknowledges the distinction between cash-flow machines and capital-hungry financial businesses. | |
| M&A Paradox: Strategic AI Buys vs. Private Equity "Indigestion" | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | Harry points out contradictory market signals between Orlando Bravo's M&A pessimism and the recent acquisition of Convergence by Salesforce. Jason shares real-world examples of $500M tech buyout offers being rejected by founders. | |
| The "Fund Returner" Fallacy and Seed Fund Economics | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | Harry presents Vencap LP data on historical exit size growth to question mega-fund critiques. Rory humorously catches Harry out for using someone else's data, pointing out he obtained the underlying dataset directly from the source. | |
| The Liquidity Dilemma: When to Sell, Taxes, and the Death of IPOs | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | Harry brings up UK capital gains tax advantages relative to California. Rory dismisses the comparison by mocking European tech outcome sizes and explaining how private holding periods create LP/GP liquidity friction. | |
| Reforming the Public Markets and The Cost of Private Capital | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry asks for structural reform ideas to make public markets more attractive to tech founders. Rory proposes time-based voting models and highlights the hidden costs embedded in late-stage private ratchets. | |
| Real-World Predictions: OpenAI's Non-Profit Status and ChatGPT-5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Harry prompts quick-fire prediction market questions regarding OpenAI and ChatGPT-5. Rory explains how the non-profit branding was critical for attracting elite AI engineering talent early on. | |
| Analyzing the Rippling vs. Deel Lawsuit and Settlement Strategies | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | Harry attempts to defend Deel CEO Alex Bouaziz as a personal friend and portfolio founder. Both guests forcefully reject Deel's counterclaims as a sign of weakness and advise settling immediately to avoid potential criminal exposure. | |
| Key Takeaways from SaaStr 2024 and the AI Pivot | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry takes credit alongside Jason for banning past-focused sessions at SaaStr 2024. Rory contrasts post-crash founder mindset scarring with the necessary forward-looking AI pivot. | |
| AI's Impact on Tech Budgets, Team Headcounts, and Moats | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | Harry brings up Microsoft's move to open-source VS Code features and its potential impact on Cursor and Windsurf. Rory reframes Microsoft's aggressive move as evidence of competitive pressure from nimble startups. | |
| AI Sales Tools, Commoditization, and the Power of Wedge Products | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | Harry expresses strong skepticism regarding crowded AI note-taking investments. Rory schools Harry using an Amazon bookseller analogy from 1996 to explain how narrow wedge products evolve into platform defensive moats. | |
| Inside the VC Boardroom: Defensibility vs. Growth Trade-offs | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Harry introduces Anthropic's revenue run-rate jump from $1B to $2B in a single quarter. Rory details internal VC boardroom debates balancing commodity fast-growth deals against high-IP defensible investments. | |
| Chegg's Collapse and the Threat of Model Context Protocol (MCP) | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | Harry asks what incumbent software category will collapse like Chegg next. Jason explains how Model Context Protocol (MCP) could strip application layers down to basic underlying databases. |