Caltech physicist Rana Adhikari explains why commercial scientific lasers cannot be directly used in gravitational wave detectors without custom stabilization.
Opinion
Adhikari: LIGO could probably double its detected signals from existing data
“I think in our data there must be, probably we could double the number of signals we have right now if we were to, I mean, that's my guess. It could be much more.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Adhikari: 40-kilometer interferometers could detect collapsing first stars
“We would be able to find signals from Basically, the, all the way back. I mean, it would have. We would find the first stars in the universe, and they were collapsing, if they exist, which I think they do.”
What-if
Adhikari: Decades of required effort would have deterred early gravitational wave researchers
“If they, I think if they had known how tough it would be, or that it was going to take fifties, five years to have success, probably no one would have started.”
Assertion Supported
Adhikari: Laser radiation pressure physically moves LIGO's 40-kilogram mirrors
“There's so much laser power that when you, it's weird to think about, but there's so much laser power when we hit the mirror, it moves the mirror. And the mirror, if you, to imagine it, is about this big. And it is 40 kilograms”
Insight
Adhikari: LIGO noise reduction has reached linear limits, needs nonlinear regression
“Now we've reached the limit of what you can do with linear noise subtraction, and we need some better ideas on how to do the next thing. And the next thing involves nonlinear regression.”
Prediction Open · timeframe Sep 2117
Adhikari: Michelson interferometers won't be used for gravitational waves in a century
“If you ask in a hundred years from now, will people still build Michelson laser interferometers and do the same thing? Right. I have a hard time believing that's true.”