Benjamin: 50-qubit supremacy devices will launch within a year but lack practical utility
Simon Benjamin · Simon Benjamin on Architectures for Quantum Computing · Y Combinator · May 25, 2018 · at 49:54
Oxford quantum theorist Simon Benjamin discusses the near-term timeline for 50-qubit quantum supremacy hardware versus its real-world utility.
0:00 / 0:24exact quote · 24.4s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“On the other hand, what we believe is about to happen in the coming year is that people will start to bring out qubits, ah, sorry quantum devices that are at or just a little bit over the quantum supremacy threshold. This number, a lot of people are racing to deliver 50 qubits because it's this kind of magic number. So those machines, however, won't, as far as we know, be immediately useful for stuff that people really want to do.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Simon Benjamin
Benjamin: Theorists have found no useful application for a 64-qubit quantum computer
“The theorists have not worked out anything that a 64 qubit quantum computer can do that's super useful.”
Benjamin's team plans to scale using networked five-qubit modular units
“We actually are planning to build a machine, which will be made out of modules, which each one is a small quantum computer, and by the way, so small that on its own, it's not good for anything. Even as few as five qubits, right? And then we have modules, and w…”
Benjamin: Modular architecture is the only viable route to rapid quantum scaling
“And in fact, this network approach is, I think the only one that if you wanted to Manhattan project it, right, or moonshot it, you're one of these big projects that have happened in the past where you have a goal that's extremely challenging and you just decid…”
Benjamin: Ion traps are the gold standard of qubits
“So they are actually the gold standard of qubits.”
Benjamin: Quantum applications needing fewer than 50 qubits can be simulated classically
“There's no point, if you think you've got a clever idea for what to use a quantum computer for, and that's going to change the world, if your idea involves much less than 50 qubits, you're wrong. Because, ah, you may have a very nice idea, but what we would do…”
Benjamin: Entanglement distillation allows low-quality links to achieve high internal fidelity
“As long as your boxes have a very good memory, they do have a very good memory, as long as they have very good quality internal operations, which they do have, then you can take a poor quality link and boost it by using it a few times into effectively a very g…”