Brundage: AI Governance Lacks the Methodological Rigor of Climate Science
Miles Brundage · A.I. Policy and Public Perception - Miles Brundage and Tim Hwang · Y Combinator · Apr 25, 2018 · at 21:46
Miles Brundage, AI policy researcher at Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, compares the methodological tools used in AI governance forecasting against institutional frameworks like the IPCC.
“People have been talking about AI AI ethics and AI governance for a long time, but there hasn't been much dialogue between, you know, this world and then the other worlds of, like, you know, science policy and public policy, and, you know, one way to think about it is that AI is sort of less mature in terms of its, you know, methodological rigor, like, you know, the best we've sort of come up with is, like, let's do a survey of some experts, whereas in, You know, you look at something like climate change you know, they not only, like, you know, do surveys of experts, but also, like, synthesize that expertise into, like, an IPCC report that's supposed to be, like, super authoritative and has, you know, error bars for everything and, like, levels of confidence in different statements.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →