Mar 6, 2026 · 37m · y-combinator

Common Mistakes With Vibe Coded Websites · Y Combinator

Raphael Schaad · 16m spoken Aaron Epstein · 16m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Y Combinator's Aaron Epstein and Raphaël Schaad review AI-built startup landing pages to highlight common AI design tropes, user experience pitfalls, and actionable strategies for founders to create distinct, high-converting websites.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The partners as informed peer 6.5 Guest teaching 6.3 Guest disagreement 0.0 The partners pushing back 0.0
05100:0010:0020:0030:000:19–2:58 · The partners as informed peer 6/10 Title Sequence: Design Review Aaron introduces Rafael and discusses the rise of AI design trends and boilerplate tropes like purple gradients and fade-in scroll sections. Both speakers are completely aligned and build on each other's observations.2:58–9:19 · The partners as informed peer 7/10 Website Review: Nunu.ai Reviewing Nunu.ai, Rafael breaks down why certain hover animations and hiding critical functionality behind hover are severe anti-patterns on web and mobile. Aaron provides complementary insights on usability and visual distraction.9:19–13:28 · The partners as informed peer 6/10 Website Review: Rosebud AI The hosts evaluate Rosebud AI, praising the interactive embedded 3D game sandbox while noting weak hierarchy and clashing color accents. Both agree on core conversion fundamentals like H1 clarity above the fold.13:28–19:10 · The partners as informed peer 6/10 Website Review: GetCrux Reviewing GetCrux, both critique distracting scroll-jacking, low-resolution video assets, and delayed fade-in animations that obscure FAQ answers. The tone is constructive and analytical.19:10–25:39 · The partners as informed peer 7/10 Website Review: Sphinx Looking at Sphinx, Rafael details how LLMs generate cluttered visual hierarchies with too many conflicting styles and fake interactive buttons. Aaron observes that founders must act as discerning editors rather than blindly accepting AI output.25:39–30:27 · The partners as informed peer 7/10 Website Review: Build0 Reviewing Build0, Aaron identifies stereotypical LLM dashboard color tropes (Fisher-Price primaries) while Rafael points out subtle layout shifting bugs caused by careless hover effects.30:27–34:35 · The partners as informed peer 6/10 Website Review: Zarna The hosts inspect Zarna, noting severe contrast issues where light header text becomes unreadable over dynamic video backgrounds, alongside non-functional interactive cards.34:35–37:17 · The partners as informed peer 7/10 General Takeaways and Best Practices Aaron and Rafael synthesize their key takeaways, stressing that founders must thoroughly QA vibe-coded websites and define their brand identity proactively rather than accepting generic AI defaults.0:19–2:58 · Guest teaching 5/10 Title Sequence: Design Review Aaron introduces Rafael and discusses the rise of AI design trends and boilerplate tropes like purple gradients and fade-in scroll sections. Both speakers are completely aligned and build on each other's observations.2:58–9:19 · Guest teaching 7/10 Website Review: Nunu.ai Reviewing Nunu.ai, Rafael breaks down why certain hover animations and hiding critical functionality behind hover are severe anti-patterns on web and mobile. Aaron provides complementary insights on usability and visual distraction.9:19–13:28 · Guest teaching 6/10 Website Review: Rosebud AI The hosts evaluate Rosebud AI, praising the interactive embedded 3D game sandbox while noting weak hierarchy and clashing color accents. Both agree on core conversion fundamentals like H1 clarity above the fold.13:28–19:10 · Guest teaching 6/10 Website Review: GetCrux Reviewing GetCrux, both critique distracting scroll-jacking, low-resolution video assets, and delayed fade-in animations that obscure FAQ answers. The tone is constructive and analytical.19:10–25:39 · Guest teaching 7/10 Website Review: Sphinx Looking at Sphinx, Rafael details how LLMs generate cluttered visual hierarchies with too many conflicting styles and fake interactive buttons. Aaron observes that founders must act as discerning editors rather than blindly accepting AI output.25:39–30:27 · Guest teaching 6/10 Website Review: Build0 Reviewing Build0, Aaron identifies stereotypical LLM dashboard color tropes (Fisher-Price primaries) while Rafael points out subtle layout shifting bugs caused by careless hover effects.30:27–34:35 · Guest teaching 6/10 Website Review: Zarna The hosts inspect Zarna, noting severe contrast issues where light header text becomes unreadable over dynamic video backgrounds, alongside non-functional interactive cards.34:35–37:17 · Guest teaching 7/10 General Takeaways and Best Practices Aaron and Rafael synthesize their key takeaways, stressing that founders must thoroughly QA vibe-coded websites and define their brand identity proactively rather than accepting generic AI defaults.0:19–2:58 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Title Sequence: Design Review Aaron introduces Rafael and discusses the rise of AI design trends and boilerplate tropes like purple gradients and fade-in scroll sections. Both speakers are completely aligned and build on each other's observations.2:58–9:19 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: Nunu.ai Reviewing Nunu.ai, Rafael breaks down why certain hover animations and hiding critical functionality behind hover are severe anti-patterns on web and mobile. Aaron provides complementary insights on usability and visual distraction.9:19–13:28 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: Rosebud AI The hosts evaluate Rosebud AI, praising the interactive embedded 3D game sandbox while noting weak hierarchy and clashing color accents. Both agree on core conversion fundamentals like H1 clarity above the fold.13:28–19:10 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: GetCrux Reviewing GetCrux, both critique distracting scroll-jacking, low-resolution video assets, and delayed fade-in animations that obscure FAQ answers. The tone is constructive and analytical.19:10–25:39 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: Sphinx Looking at Sphinx, Rafael details how LLMs generate cluttered visual hierarchies with too many conflicting styles and fake interactive buttons. Aaron observes that founders must act as discerning editors rather than blindly accepting AI output.25:39–30:27 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: Build0 Reviewing Build0, Aaron identifies stereotypical LLM dashboard color tropes (Fisher-Price primaries) while Rafael points out subtle layout shifting bugs caused by careless hover effects.30:27–34:35 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Website Review: Zarna The hosts inspect Zarna, noting severe contrast issues where light header text becomes unreadable over dynamic video backgrounds, alongside non-functional interactive cards.34:35–37:17 · Guest disagreement 0/10 General Takeaways and Best Practices Aaron and Rafael synthesize their key takeaways, stressing that founders must thoroughly QA vibe-coded websites and define their brand identity proactively rather than accepting generic AI defaults.0:19–2:58 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Title Sequence: Design Review Aaron introduces Rafael and discusses the rise of AI design trends and boilerplate tropes like purple gradients and fade-in scroll sections. Both speakers are completely aligned and build on each other's observations.2:58–9:19 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: Nunu.ai Reviewing Nunu.ai, Rafael breaks down why certain hover animations and hiding critical functionality behind hover are severe anti-patterns on web and mobile. Aaron provides complementary insights on usability and visual distraction.9:19–13:28 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: Rosebud AI The hosts evaluate Rosebud AI, praising the interactive embedded 3D game sandbox while noting weak hierarchy and clashing color accents. Both agree on core conversion fundamentals like H1 clarity above the fold.13:28–19:10 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: GetCrux Reviewing GetCrux, both critique distracting scroll-jacking, low-resolution video assets, and delayed fade-in animations that obscure FAQ answers. The tone is constructive and analytical.19:10–25:39 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: Sphinx Looking at Sphinx, Rafael details how LLMs generate cluttered visual hierarchies with too many conflicting styles and fake interactive buttons. Aaron observes that founders must act as discerning editors rather than blindly accepting AI output.25:39–30:27 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: Build0 Reviewing Build0, Aaron identifies stereotypical LLM dashboard color tropes (Fisher-Price primaries) while Rafael points out subtle layout shifting bugs caused by careless hover effects.30:27–34:35 · The partners pushing back 0/10 Website Review: Zarna The hosts inspect Zarna, noting severe contrast issues where light header text becomes unreadable over dynamic video backgrounds, alongside non-functional interactive cards.34:35–37:17 · The partners pushing back 0/10 General Takeaways and Best Practices Aaron and Rafael synthesize their key takeaways, stressing that founders must thoroughly QA vibe-coded websites and define their brand identity proactively rather than accepting generic AI defaults.

speaking balance: gold is the partners, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the partners 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 7:03 Calling out desktop hover anti-patterns

In a completely collaborative episode, this represents the strongest aesthetic objection as Rafael forcefully rejects hiding critical tools behind hover interactions.

Hardest push from the partners ▶ 21:20 Challenging confusing workflow animations

Aaron firmly questions the value of auto-shifting buttons and looping workflow animations that distract from communicating product value.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 5:46 Browser defaults versus LLM hover mistakes

Rafael breaks down how native cursor affordances work and why LLM-generated fading hover effects violate foundational UX principles.

The partners hold their own ▶ 35:55 Framework for intentional AI design

Aaron articulates a clear strategy for founders to define their visual brand and QA rigorously rather than passively accepting LLM defaults.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe partners as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe partners pushing backWhy
Title Sequence: Design Review 6500 Aaron introduces Rafael and discusses the rise of AI design trends and boilerplate tropes like purple gradients and fade-in scroll sections. Both speakers are completely aligned and build on each other's observations.
Website Review: Nunu.ai 7700 Reviewing Nunu.ai, Rafael breaks down why certain hover animations and hiding critical functionality behind hover are severe anti-patterns on web and mobile. Aaron provides complementary insights on usability and visual distraction.
Website Review: Rosebud AI 6600 The hosts evaluate Rosebud AI, praising the interactive embedded 3D game sandbox while noting weak hierarchy and clashing color accents. Both agree on core conversion fundamentals like H1 clarity above the fold.
Website Review: GetCrux 6600 Reviewing GetCrux, both critique distracting scroll-jacking, low-resolution video assets, and delayed fade-in animations that obscure FAQ answers. The tone is constructive and analytical.
Website Review: Sphinx 7700 Looking at Sphinx, Rafael details how LLMs generate cluttered visual hierarchies with too many conflicting styles and fake interactive buttons. Aaron observes that founders must act as discerning editors rather than blindly accepting AI output.
Website Review: Build0 7600 Reviewing Build0, Aaron identifies stereotypical LLM dashboard color tropes (Fisher-Price primaries) while Rafael points out subtle layout shifting bugs caused by careless hover effects.
Website Review: Zarna 6600 The hosts inspect Zarna, noting severe contrast issues where light header text becomes unreadable over dynamic video backgrounds, alongside non-functional interactive cards.
General Takeaways and Best Practices 7700 Aaron and Rafael synthesize their key takeaways, stressing that founders must thoroughly QA vibe-coded websites and define their brand identity proactively rather than accepting generic AI defaults.

Statements from this episode (11)

Insight
Epstein: Ubiquity Strips AI Design Tropes of Originality and Impact
“It's not purple gradients are bad. Nobody should ever use them. It's that now they're just so ubiquitous everywhere that they kind of lose all meaning and specialness and originality.”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 2:01
Insight
Schaad: LLMs Rapidly Accelerate Web Design Copycatting and Homogeneity
“When there was a good website kind of establishing a trend, it took a while in the old world for others to kind of like copy these trends. But now with LLMs, if there's a good website with a purple gradient, it makes it into the LLM because the LLM gets traine…”
Raphael Schaad Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 2:12
Insight
Epstein: Poor demo design signals a YC applicant didn't try
“Especially as we're reviewing YC applications, if you look at a demo and that demo does not have a base level of quality design, it seems like the person just didn't even try because it's so easy to do it now.”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 8:59
Insight
Schaad: Standard emojis on landing pages are an immediate AI tell
“Whenever I see the use of emojis, even though they're not the system emojis, I feel like it's a little lazy. And so I feel like LLMs kind of take the easy path because they don't have any IP really themselves. They're just like big models kind of cobbling thin…”
Raphael Schaad Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 11:41
Insight
Schaad: Scroll-jacking landing pages breaks user orientation and progress tracking
“It's also if these, with these landing pages that kind of, like, build up and then keep you in a section for a little while, it's really hard to know when you're, like, how far into the book you have read. Right? Like, if you have a physical book, you're kind …”
Raphael Schaad Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 24:21
Insight
Schaad: One-shotting websites with AI causes founders to overlook interface bugs
“I almost wonder, like if you just one shot landing pages do you actually go and really like use it with the same Attention detail as you feel if you had like built it from scratch. And then because you don't you just ship things that are, that you wouldn't hav…”
Raphael Schaad Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 26:55
Insight
Epstein: Generic AI website designs undermine startup product credibility
“And for any, anybody else in the audience, like, you lose a little bit of credibility, I think, you know, when your customers are viewing your product and they're saying like, Eh, this looks like a bunch of other things I've seen. They probably just use AI to …”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 29:45
Opinion
Epstein: Blanket '10x' startup landing page metrics feel fabricated
“It's all, everything 10 x just feels made up.”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 30:51
Insight
Epstein: AI tools generate gratuitous motion effects humans wouldn't build
“Even the little bits of motion here is the kind of thing that like AI will just give you that for free and you're like, yeah, okay, let's go with that. But you would never create yourself.”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 33:32
Insight
Schaad: Startup landing pages must be customer acquisition channels, not interactive toys
“It's kind of like a customer acquisition channel, right? This is not your product. This is not a web site as in kind of like a cool thing on the web. There's space for that as well, but these are like Startup landing pages and they're basically customer acquis…”
Raphael Schaad Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 35:18
Insight
Epstein: Founders should define branding before prompting AI web design tools
“It's very easy using the same tools that everybody else is using to end up in the same place. You have to be intentional about ending up in a different place. And so rather than start from What does the AI spit out? And then let's tweak that. I would start fro…”
Aaron Epstein Mar 6, 2026 ▶ 36:12
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.