why aren't all 14 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Insight
Investors are a terrible target market because VCs are notoriously cheap
“Investors are not a great market. I mean, we're very cheap. We don't like to pay for technology and it's a small market, so it's going to be very hard to build a big company if you're just targeting investors.”
Opinion
Crunchbase organically became the system of record for private companies
“Crunchbase has become the system of record for private companies, and they have done that organically without any major investment or any defined strategy.”
Disclosure
Emergence spun Crunchbase from AOL to build a next-gen Dun & Bradstreet
“So when we spun it out of AOL, we had the thesis that we could create a next gen B to B database. So think of next gen Dan and Bradstreet with a much more efficient and organic data acquisition model. So think of LinkedIn, but for companies instead of for peop…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Less than a third of Crunchbase's original users were actually investors
“More than one third of the use case for Crunchbase, the lookup use case, original Crunchbase use case, We're not investors. We're salespeople. They were using Crunchbase for prospecting, and that's what got us excited. One-third was HR-related, people in the r…”
Insight
Crunchbase's historical network moat is nearly impossible to recreate from scratch
“The power of the network is something that is very hard to recreate. If you were starting from scratch, then you can create a great tool, a great platform. But if you don't have the history that crunch base has, it's going to be very hard to build that.”
Assertion Partly supported
Emergence invested just $7 million to spin Crunchbase out of AOL
“So we invested seven million dollars.”
Disclosure
Emergence Capital invests exclusively in B2B cloud companies
“We're focused exclusively on B to B cloud. We don't do anything outside of that.”
Disclosure
Emergence Capital typically invests $5M to $10M in Series A rounds
“So typical check size is anywhere between five to ten million dollars going in, It's a series A”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Emergence interviewed 85 CEO candidates before hiring Jager McConnell for Crunchbase
“We talked to over 85 CEO candidates for that process, and we ended up getting, I mean, we're fortunate to get Jagger McConnell from Salesforce”
Disclosure
Crunchbase rebuilt its entire software architecture after the AOL spinout
“Over the last couple of years, we rebuilt everything to make it scalable, because it was a great asset when it comes to data, not necessarily a great asset when it comes to software architecture, and also when it comes to business model.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Emergence Capital's $330 million fund was 60% deployed by mid-2018
“So the last fund was three hundred and thirty million and we're about 60% deployed.”
Disclosure
Emergence Capital targets a concentrated portfolio of 20 companies per fund
“So we're probably going to invest in another seven companies. So each fund we invest in 20 companies.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Emergence spent nine months negotiating the Crunchbase spinout from AOL
“So it was a long process. It took us, I think, nine months.”
Disclosure
Zoom initially rejected building Instagram-style filters for being too distracting
“At first, we refused to come up. I mean, we talked about Instagram filters. Should we come up with Instagram filters? And then we said, no, that's going to be too distracting.”