why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Greg Rafner: Abstract maintains a seven-day sales cycle
“And so when they see it it's, we have a seven day sales cycle.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Rafner: Abstract charges $100 monthly per user with 15-16 seats average
“A hundred dollars per user per month. And our average customer has about 15, 16 number, 16 seats in the product.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Greg Rafner: Abstract serves 113 customer logos
“113 logos.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Greg Rafner: Abstract ended 2021 with $60,000 in ARR
“60,000 in ARR.”
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Rafner: Abstract outranks Gong on Google for 'conversational intelligence software'
“I think, yeah, like conversational intelligence software, we just passed gong in our rankings for that keyword.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Rafner: Abstract Operates With Two US Employees and Nine Devs in Indonesia
“So we have just two people here in the United States, two people in India.
And then I have my offshore, I guess, yeah.
Offshore development team in Indonesia is nine people.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Rafner: Act-On was one of Gong's earliest handful of users
“We started using Gong actually back when they had like a football player on their website, on their homepage. I think where we were one of the first handful of users of Gong like seven years ago.”