why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
IAC's Hatch Labs invested approximately $1 million per incubator project
“No, it was a more hands-on model, and I think it was something that was negotiated on a company-by-company basis. So, you know, they, I think they put in you know, closer to a million dollars.”
Disclosure
Privacy.com gave under 10% equity to acquire its premium domain name
“Less than 10%.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Privacy.com earns approximately 1% on average from transaction interchange fees
“It's, yeah, so on average it gets very messy, but without doing too much specifics, it's about one percent.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jiang: Privacy.com volume is growing double digits month-over-month
“Measuring that is based on our transaction volume, which has basically been growing, you know, double digit month over month since since we launched about a year ago.”
Disclosure
Jiang: Privacy.com has raised $3.5 million in venture capital
“Three and a half million.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jiang: Privacy.com has reached around 50,000 users
“We're at around 50,000 users right now.”
Assertion Supported
Jiang: Hatch Labs ran 5 to 10 mobile projects simultaneously
“Hatch Labs is a venture studio or was a venture studio and basically they had you know, between five to 10 projects running at one time. They were all mobile based, but they kind of spanned everything from, you know, messaging to delivery to dating, obviously.”