why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Contradicted
Navin: Local banks charge 4% to 5% for EUR/USD hedges
“I mean, if you would try to do that, for example, versus, I mean, with his local bank, you would pay, probably end up paying by four or five percent for the specific million dollars of euro dollar hedge.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Navin: Grain will scale hedging volume to $15B by 2025
“No, I'm saying exponential, then in twenty-twenty-four, yeah, we will have probably between five to seven billion dollars of hedging, and then it's going in, in exponential way. So 24, 25, probably we're going to be like 15,000.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Navin: GrainFinance is pre-revenue, will generate revenue by January
“Yes, pre-revenue. But let's say September, January, we'll start generating revenues.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Navin's prior Israeli hedging business serves 1,500 corporate clients
“And six years ago, I found a company in that specific area as well, providing hedging for small, medium businesses in Israel. And in that specific company, I have already 1500 companies that are doing business with me.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Navin's prior Israeli FX hedging firm is profitable and bootstrapped
“And this is a very profitable business. And this is, that, that, the company was a bootstrap. No funding raising at all.”