why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Partly supported
BigMachines took 12 years to become a Gartner category leader.
“But they're just slow, because I remember my first company, Big Machines, it took me nine years to get into Gartner Report, and 12 years to become the leader.”
Assertion Supported
BigMachines raised $20 million in year one based purely on internet hype.
“We were able to raise twenty million dollars the first year, just based on hype and the internet, and back then, VCs were not so critical. Like, there were no metrics, there was nothing. You just kind of had hype and a vision.”
Assertion Supported
Half of SteelBrick's 200 employees were Godard Abel's former BigMachines staff.
“I think of the 200 people we had when Salesforce acquired us, over a hundred were with us at Big Machines, and they were totally dialed in.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
BigMachines burned $19 million to generate just $1 million in revenue.
“In 2003, we kind of had our come to Jesus moment, because my co-founder and I, Chris, we sat down, we're like we have a million dollars left, we burned through 19. We only had a million dollars in revenue”
Disclosure
Abel: BigMachines burned $20M in dot-com era before bootstrapping
“It's kind of a long story, and I was worse than bootstrapped, because we kind of raised a bunch of money, dot com, twenty million, wasted it, and then went into bootstrapped.”
Disclosure
Abel: BigMachines burned $20M from dot-com boom before bootstrapping
“It's kind of a long story, and I was worse than bootstrapped, because we kind of raised a bunch of money, dot com, twenty million, wasted it, and then went into bootstrapped.”