StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Oct 11, 2019 · 16m · top-founders

1539 How Venga Hit 2000 locations, $3.6m ARR on $2.7m Raised Helping Restaurants, Fitness Centers with Customer Experience

Sam Pollaro · 9m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this interview, Venga CEO and co-founder Sam Pollaro explains how his hospitality and fitness CRM platform scaled to $3.6 million in ARR across 2,000 locations on just $2.7 million in raised capital. Pollaro discusses Venga's organic go-to-market partnerships, low churn metrics, disciplined team management, and long-term approach to sustainable profitability.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 39.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 5.6 Guest teaching 2.2 Guest disagreement 1.2 Nathan pushing back 2.6
05100:0010:001:07–4:28 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Core Product, Pricing Model, and Monthly Revenue Nathan quickly computes MRR and ARPU figures across 2,000 locations. Sam gently clarifies that average revenue is closer to $300k rather than $400k because some accounts are on partial tier plans.4:28–6:48 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Historical Pivots and Vertical Expansion into Fitness Nathan probes into industry consolidation and asks why MindBody acquired Booker instead of Venga. Sam educates Nathan on the distinction between class-based and appointment-based fitness market requirements.6:49–9:00 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Net Retention, Pricing Levers, and Team Structure Nathan breaks down gross revenue churn and expansion to calculate net revenue retention at 102%. Sam confirms the calculations and details the team structure.9:00–14:19 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Customer Acquisition Costs and Strategic Integrations Nathan pushes Sam on why they do not raise more venture capital if unit economics work, framing it as a potential lack of scalable marketing channels. Sam articulates why avoiding dilution keeps exit expectations manageable, which Nathan validates with exit valuation math.14:19–16:16 · Nathan as informed peer 4/10 The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions Standard Famous Five sequence and outro recap without significant friction or pushback.1:07–4:28 · Guest teaching 3/10 Core Product, Pricing Model, and Monthly Revenue Nathan quickly computes MRR and ARPU figures across 2,000 locations. Sam gently clarifies that average revenue is closer to $300k rather than $400k because some accounts are on partial tier plans.4:28–6:48 · Guest teaching 4/10 Historical Pivots and Vertical Expansion into Fitness Nathan probes into industry consolidation and asks why MindBody acquired Booker instead of Venga. Sam educates Nathan on the distinction between class-based and appointment-based fitness market requirements.6:49–9:00 · Guest teaching 1/10 Net Retention, Pricing Levers, and Team Structure Nathan breaks down gross revenue churn and expansion to calculate net revenue retention at 102%. Sam confirms the calculations and details the team structure.9:00–14:19 · Guest teaching 2/10 Customer Acquisition Costs and Strategic Integrations Nathan pushes Sam on why they do not raise more venture capital if unit economics work, framing it as a potential lack of scalable marketing channels. Sam articulates why avoiding dilution keeps exit expectations manageable, which Nathan validates with exit valuation math.14:19–16:16 · Guest teaching 1/10 The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions Standard Famous Five sequence and outro recap without significant friction or pushback.1:07–4:28 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Core Product, Pricing Model, and Monthly Revenue Nathan quickly computes MRR and ARPU figures across 2,000 locations. Sam gently clarifies that average revenue is closer to $300k rather than $400k because some accounts are on partial tier plans.4:28–6:48 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Historical Pivots and Vertical Expansion into Fitness Nathan probes into industry consolidation and asks why MindBody acquired Booker instead of Venga. Sam educates Nathan on the distinction between class-based and appointment-based fitness market requirements.6:49–9:00 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Net Retention, Pricing Levers, and Team Structure Nathan breaks down gross revenue churn and expansion to calculate net revenue retention at 102%. Sam confirms the calculations and details the team structure.9:00–14:19 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Customer Acquisition Costs and Strategic Integrations Nathan pushes Sam on why they do not raise more venture capital if unit economics work, framing it as a potential lack of scalable marketing channels. Sam articulates why avoiding dilution keeps exit expectations manageable, which Nathan validates with exit valuation math.14:19–16:16 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions Standard Famous Five sequence and outro recap without significant friction or pushback.1:07–4:28 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Core Product, Pricing Model, and Monthly Revenue Nathan quickly computes MRR and ARPU figures across 2,000 locations. Sam gently clarifies that average revenue is closer to $300k rather than $400k because some accounts are on partial tier plans.4:28–6:48 · Nathan pushing back 3/10 Historical Pivots and Vertical Expansion into Fitness Nathan probes into industry consolidation and asks why MindBody acquired Booker instead of Venga. Sam educates Nathan on the distinction between class-based and appointment-based fitness market requirements.6:49–9:00 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Net Retention, Pricing Levers, and Team Structure Nathan breaks down gross revenue churn and expansion to calculate net revenue retention at 102%. Sam confirms the calculations and details the team structure.9:00–14:19 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Customer Acquisition Costs and Strategic Integrations Nathan pushes Sam on why they do not raise more venture capital if unit economics work, framing it as a potential lack of scalable marketing channels. Sam articulates why avoiding dilution keeps exit expectations manageable, which Nathan validates with exit valuation math.14:19–16:16 · Nathan pushing back 1/10 The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions Standard Famous Five sequence and outro recap without significant friction or pushback.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 53.7% · guest 46.3%0:00 · Nathan 53.7% · guest 46.3%3:00 · Nathan 36.2% · guest 63.8%3:00 · Nathan 36.2% · guest 63.8%6:00 · Nathan 27.9% · guest 72.1%6:00 · Nathan 27.9% · guest 72.1%9:00 · Nathan 36.2% · guest 63.8%9:00 · Nathan 36.2% · guest 63.8%12:00 · Nathan 35.2% · guest 64.8%12:00 · Nathan 35.2% · guest 64.8%15:00 · Nathan 53.6% · guest 46.4%15:00 · Nathan 53.6% · guest 46.4%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 11:24 Sam defends measured growth over risky venture funding

Sam pushes back against Nathan's aggressive scaling premise, explaining that after surviving near-bankruptcy for years, taking unnecessary risk is imprudent.

 Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 11:01 Nathan challenges the reason for not raising capital

Nathan refuses to simply accept profitability as an excuse not to raise, questioning whether the business is patient or just unable to find a scalable acquisition channel.

 Biggest teaching moment ▶ 6:10 Sam details vertical SaaS distinctions in fitness and spa

Sam educates Nathan on why MindBody bought Booker to gain appointment-based software rather than CRM, detailing the role of Frederick in the deal.

 Nathan holds their own ▶ 13:54 Nathan models exit multiples and investor hurdle rates

Nathan demonstrates sharp financial command by instantly modeling how raising another $5M would spike investor return expectations from an $18M exit to a $60M exit.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Core Product, Pricing Model, and Monthly Revenue 6312 Nathan quickly computes MRR and ARPU figures across 2,000 locations. Sam gently clarifies that average revenue is closer to $300k rather than $400k because some accounts are on partial tier plans.
Historical Pivots and Vertical Expansion into Fitness 5413 Nathan probes into industry consolidation and asks why MindBody acquired Booker instead of Venga. Sam educates Nathan on the distinction between class-based and appointment-based fitness market requirements.
Net Retention, Pricing Levers, and Team Structure 6112 Nathan breaks down gross revenue churn and expansion to calculate net revenue retention at 102%. Sam confirms the calculations and details the team structure.
Customer Acquisition Costs and Strategic Integrations 7225 Nathan pushes Sam on why they do not raise more venture capital if unit economics work, framing it as a potential lack of scalable marketing channels. Sam articulates why avoiding dilution keeps exit expectations manageable, which Nathan validates with exit valuation math.
The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions 4111 Standard Famous Five sequence and outro recap without significant friction or pushback.

Statements from this episode (17)

Disclosure
Pollaro: Venga charges $200 to $300 monthly per location
“Between two and 300 dollars per month per location. So if you're a restaurant group and you've got 10 locations, you're paying, you know, 2500 bucks a month.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 1:36
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga serves about 2,000 locations
“We're about 2000 locations.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 2:13
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga operates across 150 to 200 brands
“Probably between a 152 hundred brands.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 2:17
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga generates about $300K in MRR
“We're doing about 300,000 in monthly recurring revenue.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 2:33
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga is growing at roughly 35% annually
“We're growing about 35% a year.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 3:09
What-if
Pollaro would wait much longer to raise funding if starting over
“Well, I think, you know, if I were to do it all over again, I might take a different path. I would certainly wait much longer to raise money.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 3:52
Disclosure
Pollaro: Venga took three years and multiple pivots to find product-market fit
“So we actually launched in 2011 with a product that's slightly different from what we do now. Like most companies, you know, we pivoted a couple times along the way. We realized within probably six months that our first product wasn't gonna work, and we pivote…”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 4:32
Assertion Supported
Pollaro: MindBody bought Booker to expand into appointment-based salon and spa verticals
“Well, I think actually Booker came with a company that does a little bit of what we do called Frederick. But really they were looking to expand their capabilities on the appointment side. So MindBody does a lot in class-based fitness, but they didn't have a ve…”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 6:17
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga has negative net churn on a revenue basis
“Yeah, we actually have on a revenue basis, we have negative net churn.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 6:56
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga employs a team of 21 people
“21.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 8:23
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga spends 60 to 75 cents per dollar of new ARR
“Right now we spend typically probably about 60 to 75 cents for every dollar in ARR that we acquire.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 9:24
Disclosure
Pollaro: Venga pays no kickbacks to Mindbody or OpenTable reps
“We don't, we would actually like to, but you know, the way our agreement works, you know mind, body, open table, they don't want us paying their reps you know, to sell our product.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 10:17
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Mindbody and OpenTable clients churn less when using Venga
“They actually make those referrals because it's in their best interest to because once one of their clients is using our product, they're actually stickier and less likely to churn than if they weren't.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 10:30
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Pollaro: Venga has been profitable and cash-flow positive for the past year
“No, we, we've been cashflow positive and profitable for the last year.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 10:47
Assertion Partly supported
Pollaro: Venga raised a convertible note, $1M Series A, and $1.5M bridge
“So our first round was a convertible note. We then did a million dollar series A, and then we did a bridge round million and a half after that that now since converted to equity. So now everything's in equity.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 12:50
Disclosure
Pollaro: Venga would likely look to revenue-based financing for future funding
“And then we thought about like a revenue back revenue based loans. We've considered that. And so that would probably be the first place we go for funding at this point.”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 13:09
Insight
Pollaro: Raising another $5M-$10M resets a company's required exit to $100M+
“If I were to go out and raise money now, you know, I would be sort of resetting the goalposts for what it would mean to be a successful exit, right? You know you can do some quick math and figure out roughly where our valuation is now. And if we were to raise,…”
Sam Pollaro Oct 11, 2019 ▶ 13:25
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more