StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Feb 21, 2020 · 17m · top-founders

1672 How This Lawyer Pivoted from IP Protection to CAD Editing with NASA

Paul Powers · 10m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Physna founder Paul Powers explains how his startup pivoted from 3D intellectual property protection into a predictive CAD search engine, detailing the company's SaaS business model, angel funding, and trajectory toward five million dollars in ARR.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 33.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 4.3 Guest teaching 1.8 Guest disagreement 1.2 Nathan pushing back 2.8
05100:0010:000:26–3:22 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Introducing Paul Powers and the CAD Search Space Nathan connects immediately with the CAD domain using his architecture background and calculates seat economics on the fly. Paul explains the product value proposition and 15-to-1 ROI savings ratio collaboratively.3:23–7:52 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Origin Story and Pivoting from IP Protection Nathan drills down on user metrics, pushing past vanity testing numbers like NASA Space Camp to isolate real enterprise accounts. Paul explains the core algorithmic pivot from 3D IP protection to engineering pattern recognition.7:52–10:35 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Revenue Run Rate and 2019 Growth Targets Nathan presses on revenue realities, differentiating future ARR projections from actual cash collected. Paul acknowledges they have not yet crossed one million dollars in recognized cash.10:35–13:58 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Transitioning from Product R&D to Active Sales Nathan distills Paul's lengthy explanation down to a clear confirmation of zero revenue twelve months prior. Paul details their early trade show customer acquisition and pilot strategy.13:58–16:52 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Capital Strategy: Equity versus Venture Debt Nathan challenges the dilution involved in raising seed capital via equity rather than venture debt. Paul defends common stock as the simplest instrument for his angel network before answering the Famous Five questions.16:52–17:21 · Nathan as informed peer 0/10 Episode Recap and Host Conclusion Nathan delivers a solo summary wrap-up outlining Fizna's origins, team size, funding, and revenue milestones.0:26–3:22 · Guest teaching 2/10 Introducing Paul Powers and the CAD Search Space Nathan connects immediately with the CAD domain using his architecture background and calculates seat economics on the fly. Paul explains the product value proposition and 15-to-1 ROI savings ratio collaboratively.3:23–7:52 · Guest teaching 3/10 Origin Story and Pivoting from IP Protection Nathan drills down on user metrics, pushing past vanity testing numbers like NASA Space Camp to isolate real enterprise accounts. Paul explains the core algorithmic pivot from 3D IP protection to engineering pattern recognition.7:52–10:35 · Guest teaching 3/10 Revenue Run Rate and 2019 Growth Targets Nathan presses on revenue realities, differentiating future ARR projections from actual cash collected. Paul acknowledges they have not yet crossed one million dollars in recognized cash.10:35–13:58 · Guest teaching 1/10 Transitioning from Product R&D to Active Sales Nathan distills Paul's lengthy explanation down to a clear confirmation of zero revenue twelve months prior. Paul details their early trade show customer acquisition and pilot strategy.13:58–16:52 · Guest teaching 2/10 Capital Strategy: Equity versus Venture Debt Nathan challenges the dilution involved in raising seed capital via equity rather than venture debt. Paul defends common stock as the simplest instrument for his angel network before answering the Famous Five questions.16:52–17:21 · Guest teaching 0/10 Episode Recap and Host Conclusion Nathan delivers a solo summary wrap-up outlining Fizna's origins, team size, funding, and revenue milestones.0:26–3:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Introducing Paul Powers and the CAD Search Space Nathan connects immediately with the CAD domain using his architecture background and calculates seat economics on the fly. Paul explains the product value proposition and 15-to-1 ROI savings ratio collaboratively.3:23–7:52 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Origin Story and Pivoting from IP Protection Nathan drills down on user metrics, pushing past vanity testing numbers like NASA Space Camp to isolate real enterprise accounts. Paul explains the core algorithmic pivot from 3D IP protection to engineering pattern recognition.7:52–10:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Revenue Run Rate and 2019 Growth Targets Nathan presses on revenue realities, differentiating future ARR projections from actual cash collected. Paul acknowledges they have not yet crossed one million dollars in recognized cash.10:35–13:58 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Transitioning from Product R&D to Active Sales Nathan distills Paul's lengthy explanation down to a clear confirmation of zero revenue twelve months prior. Paul details their early trade show customer acquisition and pilot strategy.13:58–16:52 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Capital Strategy: Equity versus Venture Debt Nathan challenges the dilution involved in raising seed capital via equity rather than venture debt. Paul defends common stock as the simplest instrument for his angel network before answering the Famous Five questions.16:52–17:21 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Episode Recap and Host Conclusion Nathan delivers a solo summary wrap-up outlining Fizna's origins, team size, funding, and revenue milestones.0:26–3:22 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Introducing Paul Powers and the CAD Search Space Nathan connects immediately with the CAD domain using his architecture background and calculates seat economics on the fly. Paul explains the product value proposition and 15-to-1 ROI savings ratio collaboratively.3:23–7:52 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Origin Story and Pivoting from IP Protection Nathan drills down on user metrics, pushing past vanity testing numbers like NASA Space Camp to isolate real enterprise accounts. Paul explains the core algorithmic pivot from 3D IP protection to engineering pattern recognition.7:52–10:35 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Revenue Run Rate and 2019 Growth Targets Nathan presses on revenue realities, differentiating future ARR projections from actual cash collected. Paul acknowledges they have not yet crossed one million dollars in recognized cash.10:35–13:58 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Transitioning from Product R&D to Active Sales Nathan distills Paul's lengthy explanation down to a clear confirmation of zero revenue twelve months prior. Paul details their early trade show customer acquisition and pilot strategy.13:58–16:52 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Capital Strategy: Equity versus Venture Debt Nathan challenges the dilution involved in raising seed capital via equity rather than venture debt. Paul defends common stock as the simplest instrument for his angel network before answering the Famous Five questions.16:52–17:21 · Nathan pushing back 0/10 Episode Recap and Host Conclusion Nathan delivers a solo summary wrap-up outlining Fizna's origins, team size, funding, and revenue milestones.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 48.5% · guest 51.5%0:00 · Nathan 48.5% · guest 51.5%3:00 · Nathan 24.5% · guest 75.5%3:00 · Nathan 24.5% · guest 75.5%6:00 · Nathan 32.6% · guest 67.4%6:00 · Nathan 32.6% · guest 67.4%9:00 · Nathan 24.6% · guest 75.4%9:00 · Nathan 24.6% · guest 75.4%12:00 · Nathan 34.4% · guest 65.6%12:00 · Nathan 34.4% · guest 65.6%15:00 · Nathan 37.4% · guest 62.6%15:00 · Nathan 37.4% · guest 62.6%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 14:28 Paul defends equity dilution trade-off

Paul pushes back on Nathan's criticism of dilutive equity, asserting that common stock was a deliberate and simpler trade-off for their investors.

 Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 8:22 Nathan refuses pipeline projection as current ARR

Nathan cuts through Paul's five million dollar forward target to demand whether they have actually crossed one million in cash revenue today.

 Biggest teaching moment ▶ 3:34 Paul explains technical limitation of 2D point clouds in 3D

Paul educates Nathan on why existing 2D point-cloud tech failed to understand 3D models, forcing them to develop proprietary 3D geometric recognition.

 Nathan holds their own ▶ 2:47 Nathan does instant ACV math using architecture background

Nathan rapidly models the firm's $125k contract value and demonstrates domain mastery by citing his personal CAD background in architecture school.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Introducing Paul Powers and the CAD Search Space 6212 Nathan connects immediately with the CAD domain using his architecture background and calculates seat economics on the fly. Paul explains the product value proposition and 15-to-1 ROI savings ratio collaboratively.
Origin Story and Pivoting from IP Protection 5314 Nathan drills down on user metrics, pushing past vanity testing numbers like NASA Space Camp to isolate real enterprise accounts. Paul explains the core algorithmic pivot from 3D IP protection to engineering pattern recognition.
Revenue Run Rate and 2019 Growth Targets 5325 Nathan presses on revenue realities, differentiating future ARR projections from actual cash collected. Paul acknowledges they have not yet crossed one million dollars in recognized cash.
Transitioning from Product R&D to Active Sales 5112 Nathan distills Paul's lengthy explanation down to a clear confirmation of zero revenue twelve months prior. Paul details their early trade show customer acquisition and pilot strategy.
Capital Strategy: Equity versus Venture Debt 5224 Nathan challenges the dilution involved in raising seed capital via equity rather than venture debt. Paul defends common stock as the simplest instrument for his angel network before answering the Famous Five questions.
Episode Recap and Host Conclusion 0000 Nathan delivers a solo summary wrap-up outlining Fizna's origins, team size, funding, and revenue milestones.

Statements from this episode (11)

Assertion Contradicted
Powers: Physna acts as predictive autofill for 3D CAD design
“So FISNA is best thought of as like an auto fill for three design. So if you're in the process of designing something, FISNA will try to guess what you're designing and search throughout your database be it through CAD or PLM or whatever you use to see if you'…”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 0:51
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Powers: Physna delivers a 15-to-1 ROI, saving $37,440 per user annually
“We saved the average customer 37,440 dollars per user per year that they're with us but the average cost per user is going to be 2500, so it's a 15 to one ratio of savings to cost.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 2:03
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Powers: Pre-Physna tech failed to analyze 3D models natively
“We realized that nothing was actually built to understand three D from a three D perspective. Everything was just a two D technology like point cloud or whatever, trying to understand three D.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 4:22
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Powers: Physna has roughly 50 total organizations using its tool
“So I would say right now we're probably talking around if you add between the non-governmental and the governmental and the testers versus the actual customers rolling around 50.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 5:35
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Powers: Under a third of Physna's user organizations are paying
“So the paying customers, there's rolling maybe a third or under a third of that.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 6:45
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Powers: Physna expects to add 100 to 200 paying customers next year
“So I would say that next year, our goal for next year is to add on probably about, I would think we get to maybe another hundred or 200 paying customers.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 6:50
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Powers: Physna should reach at least $5M ARR by end of 2019
“We should be at least at about five million recurring annual revenue at the end of 2019.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 8:17
Disclosure
Powers: Physna has not surpassed $1M in cash-collected ARR
“We have not broken. Broken it as far as it actually received in the bank.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 8:54
Disclosure
Powers: Physna employs 15 people in Cincinnati, Ohio
“We have 15 people. They're all in Cincinnati, Ohio.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 9:13
Disclosure
Powers: Physna raised its entire $2M seed round as common stock
“With the people being high net worth individuals who are investing, we've kind of chosen to kind of keep it simple and equity just seemed to be the simplest option. Just straight up common stock.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 14:18
Disclosure
Powers: Physna plans a May Series A and considers venture debt
“Now we're looking probably doing a larger raise around May that'll be more of a series A type raise. And for that, we are considering doing it.”
Paul Powers Feb 21, 2020 ▶ 14:59
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more