The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Sigil Wen no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 4 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.85

Q has come out and said he, you know, loves O-ones, and, like, it feels like it's aligned with American values and freedom and, like, brain drain and even strategic stuff. Like, there's a lot of, there's a lot of pro. Um, are the number of O-ones increasing? Is this a new program? Can you give us, like, a little bit of, like, history and trajectory for the O-one program broadly?

A Yeah, I mean, I like to think that the O-one was created for the Manhattan Project. I think the, the, it's, it's that ethos. Um, I, I don't know the exact origins, but it's, it's, it's been around and it's, it's been used to, the premise of it is that you are the top, you're an individual that has risen to the top of your field. I like to say you're like the top .1 percentile at what you do. And USCIS has Uh, these eight criterias to adhere towards. Um, you can, you can be a tattoo artist. You could be a tip designer. You could be a, uh, you know, the founder of the fastest growing AI company who I'm currently helping out. Um, as long as you can prove that you are extraordinary at what you do, you can get it. And I think for the longest time it was, it was very unclear. Cause when you go to the website, it's like examples, you, uh, you have a Nobel prize or like whichever. And The, the, the way this company came to be was I literally mapped down, um, 500 people who have O-ones and EB-ones for extraordinary ability. I gave them these hoodies. I actually built a website and just compiled them in terms of like their stories and like how they came to America. And, um, yeah, I think that because of that, more and more people have been applying for it. There's no cap to it. As long as you meet, um, their bar for and convince USCIS that you're extraordinary, you can get it. And so I t…

AI assessment note: “I don't know the exact origins, but it's, it's been around”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 500 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.