why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Opinion
Schneider: Andreessen Horowitz is a media company that does venture capital
“People think a, 16 Z is a venture company. It's like, no, they're a media company that, Does venture, right? It's the opposite.”
Disclosure
Torenberg: a16z Offered Series A Weeks After Product Hunt Seed Round
“I remember at Product Hunt, we raised a seed round. We had like two million dollars or something, maybe 1.5 or two million dollars in the seed round. And then a few weeks later, we got a term, a series A term sheet from Andreessen Horowitz. And we didn't even …”
Opinion
Isenberg: Reforge made a mistake by raising venture capital from a16z
“That's their first mistake. Yeah. I mean, I would have just not raised money.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Isenberg: Benedict Evans fell asleep during his 2018 Andreessen Horowitz pitch
“This person was Benedict Evans. Benedict Evans fell asleep. Oh no. During my pitch.”
Opinion
Mullenweg: Marc and Ben's public writing disrupted the VC model for a16z
“What would Andreessen Horowitz be without Mark's seminal essays and Ben's amazing books and essays, you know, like Their writing is part of how they disrupted the VC model and became Andres and Horowitz, which now we take for granted.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Postma: a16z and Sequoia Held Funding Talks for Headlime in 2021
“Two years ago, I had talks with Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia, stuff like that.”
Disclosure
Jin broke into Andreessen Horowitz by cold-applying on their public website
“I actually cold applied to Andreessen Horowitz on the website as a last ditch attempt to not have to go to business school.”