The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jake Knapp no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Now, Jake, I don't know if you've ever done this, but have you ever done something like taking a screenshot of, for example, the basics, going to ChatGPT or ChatGPT Pro, and being like, I'm thinking about creating a startup. This is the idea. What am I missing?

A I don't think that would be a bad idea, but I don't do it because my experience with experimenting with it has been that the, the way chat GPT looks at the world, it just tends to be like kind of the oatmeal version of things. And I'm so much more interested in like the opinionated, like weird versions of things that people come up with. Uh, I still feel like for weirdness, Humans have like kind of an advantage at that. And, and so I, I like, I like the founders take more than that. And that said, it's not going to hurt to do that. And I should totally be wrong. And I'm sure like thousands of people would shout at me, like you're wrong. Like you can totally get that great stuff from it. That's just been my experience. We had a, we had a founder recently who actually ran an entire design sprint. And this is a smart guy, like co-founder of a Google Gemini, real smart guy who left and found a new, a new startup. And he's like, you know, great. We're running this design sprint together, running this foundation sprint together. Great. But I want to see what, um, I'm going to create like some different GPTs, have them run through as if they were a team, right? Like see what they produce in their own foundation sprint and their own design sprint. And, you know, we looked at it and it was kind of like, eh, like what you came up with was so much, so much spicier as a, as a human going t…

AI assessment note: “I don't think that would be a bad idea, but I don't do it”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.