The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jackie Chou no published score: only 2 usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
2on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q don't work for me point of view. So he goes, I always try, but it never work. I just spend lots of money and it doesn't result in sales. I think my ass might be too organic in nature to ever work with an ad source audience. I also hate ads myself and have you block origin and one block. So that might explain the mismatch. What do you think?

A I think it's different for consumer and maybe SAS products. SAS keywords are super hard to make it work. Um, and I think as an indie hacker, I kind of might even agree with him, but in this scenario, exactly with the make Europe great again, he definitely has to run ads. Um, it's a no brainer, but I actually think there is a place for testing paid ads for Even B to B space, even despite it being very expensive. Cause then I think historically what we've done is we would run ads on a target keyword and we would see the conversions on that. And after, if it's pretty good, if it's a pretty good keyword, then we were targeted in SEO, if that makes sense. Um, it's like a, why not type of thing. You don't have to spend too much, you know, as long as it's the data is significant, I think we're a okay to proceed, you know, that's all you have to do.

AI assessment note: “I think it's different for consumer and maybe SAS products.”

Answered raw tape D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 4.15

Q So go back to the document for a sec. Why isn't Peter Levels doing this?

A Well, I did, I did slide into his DMS. I, and talked to him about it. Um, he saw it more as spammy, but I think you could approach it in like a real way, you know, hire interior designer, write about these, I don't know, high ticket, uh, affiliate content niches, such as like larger pieces, I don't know, best infrared sauna, best, I don't know, sofas, leather sofas. Stuff like that. Um, and handwrite it. Don't maybe use AI assisted human edited type of stuff. Um, you don't really have to go pure AI spam. Cause then your chart will look like this, you know, feels bad, man, but you know what? It was only this, um, my domain was only hit on a subdirectory. Hence why I suggested that you put it into guides instead. So Google will just hit the guide sub subdirectory and not your whole domain. Cause this business is still operational far and away. And it does like significant revenue every month. Um, so yeah.

AI assessment note: “I, and talked to him about it. Um, he saw it more as spammy”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.