The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Dan Koe no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q videos and then from that you, you extend it. Right. And you're, you, you're not using the LMS to at this point write it. But, um, I guess my question is, cause someone, someone listening to this is going to be like, Okay, but you never talked about the hardest part, which is your great ideas on Twitter. You know what I mean? So, how do you think about that?

A So it's kind of circular, right? The ideas for Twitter can come from two different places. It can come from the newsletter itself. So I'll show over here in a second, but it can come from the newsletter itself. And that's a good way to generate ideas. But the mistake that people make there is they'll have a really good newsletter and they'll think, okay, I'm supposed, I'm supposed to pull ideas from this and they'll read a certain sentence or paragraph and just try to copy paste that directly. And post it on Twitter with maybe a few changes when in reality what you're looking for is just the idea that you can turn into a high performing tweet. So it's kind of the same thing there where The first step is learning how to write high-performing tweets, and there's courses on there, there's courses on this, there's YouTube videos on this. The best thing I can recommend is actually what I'm going to show you, but You need to kind of immerse yourself in good writing and ideas. I think the best thing you can do to write better social content in general is to just keep a swipe file of really good ideas that you'd like to emulate under your own brand. I think of brand as the ideas that you associate yourself with. And so you're not necessarily copying other people's ideas or taking other people's ideas. You're synthesizing a bunch of different ideas that Or technically what compose your …

AI assessment note: “The ideas for Twitter can come from two different places.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.