The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Hubert: Formal math proofs enable self-improving reinforcement learning loops
“The advantage of that is that once kind of the proof is complete then you know, the machine would give you a signal back to say, yes, your proof is correct or not. And so we could search for kind of correct proofs. Once we find a correct proof, we can learn fr…”
Hubert: AlphaProof reached high school level but cannot rival Terence Tao
“And to be honest with you know, like kind of we, at the moment we can't rival at all with someone like Terry Tao. We, I think we demonstrated that what we've demonstrated is that we can learn general mathematics almost from scratch and arrive at kind of an imp…”
Hubert: Automated Formal Proof Checkers Enable Mass Crowdsourced Mathematics
“But if you instead relied on a formal system to check everyone else's work, then You could do a little bit like in astronomy where you could have an amateur kind of living in the middle of maybe nowhere and you, you've never met. And then you wouldn't have to …”
DeepMind's Hubert: Solving Harder Math Requires Introducing New Mathematical Objects
“To prove harder problems, you start to need to be able to introduce these new kind of mathematical objects to decompose the problems or problems. And we see that already happening for the IMO at a, you know, small scale.”