Reid Hoffman discusses regulatory policy following his attendance at the UK AI Safety Summit, arguing against proposals to halt or preempt AI innovation with heavy regulation.
“Generally speaking, regulation is enshrining the past against the future, and if you look at every industry that goes really intense in regulation, it's, it slows down intensely on innovation, and if you say, well, that's what we should be doing in AI, it's like, look, I think you are categorically wrong and harming humanity.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Reid Hoffman
Insight
Reid Hoffman: Calls for a Global Six-Month AI Pause Cannot Work
“You don't set up a flare and say, everyone should pause for six months. Oh, look, eight billion people paused. On your theory of the universe, the UN would be a highly functioning organization that we would all use for a whole bunch of things. It doesn't work.”
Hoffman: AI Improves Humanity's Overall Risk Portfolio Against Pandemics and Climate
“When you get to pandemic, maybe the only way to solve pandemic is AI. Well, a certain help for climate is AI. It's net, I think, strongly in the positive column. It doesn't to say that it might not add some existential risk characteristics to the overall portf…”
Hoffman: AI cannot be built by UN committees, academics lack building experience
“And you just can't have AI built by UN committee. It just doesn't exist. And it's one of the things that academics mostly don't understand because they've never, most of them, not all, of course, but most have never built anything, don't really understand how …”
Reid Hoffman: GPT-4 Is Superintelligent in Key Capabilities and Not Alarming
“GBD-IV is already super intelligent relative to a number of human capabilities, is actually not that alarming. Go play with GBD-IV. It's not alarming. It's actually enhancing and amplifying in various ways.”
Hoffman: I Refused to Sign the 22-Word AI Existential Risk Statement
“This is one of the reasons why I didn't sign the 22 word statement of, you know, AI should be treated as an existential risk along with climate change, pandemic, et cetera.”
Hoffman: AI Critics Trumpeting Negativity May Do More Harm Than Good
“The critics think they're virtuous because they go, oh, there's this danger that we should trumpet, and you're like, well, actually, in fact, you may be doing more harm than you're doing good in your attempt to be virtuous, because by trumpeting the negativity…”
This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.