Nov 8, 2024 · 1h 9m · mad
Superintelligence, Bubbles And Big Bets: AI Investing in 2024 | Matt Turck & Aman Kabeer, FirstMark
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this end-of-year 2024 episode of The MAD Podcast, FirstMark venture capitalists Matt Turck and Aman Kabeer analyze the state of artificial intelligence, evaluating record startup valuations, infrastructure demands, and the debate surrounding an AI bubble. They break down investment opportunities across the AI stack, contrasting enterprise deployment realities with shifting market dynamics and long-term tech trajectories.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Matt holds 84.4% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Matt, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Aman pushes back on Sundar Pichai's claim that AI generates over 25% of Google's code, noting internal engineers pointed out it is mostly basic auto-complete rather than true generative code creation.
Hardest push from Matt ▶ 1:01:04 Refuting the Death of SaaS PremiseMatt directly rejects the premise that AI will kill software, arguing instead that SaaS will evolve from wrappers around databases into wrappers around intelligence.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 51:06 FirstMark CTO Guild Survey Reality CheckAman presents concrete internal survey data from FirstMark's CTO Guild showing that 62% of CTOs who adopted AI in the past year were underwhelmed by its impact.
Matt holds his own ▶ 14:09 Public SaaS vs Pre-Revenue AI Valuation MathMatt demonstrates deep market mastery by contrasting public SaaS valuation standards ($375M NTM revenue needed for a $3B valuation at 8x) against pre-revenue AI startups commanding identical valuations.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Matt as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Matt pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mega Rounds, Record Valuations, and Unprecedented Acquires | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Matt Turck opens with an extensive breakdown of major AI funding milestones, citing OpenAI's $6.6B round, SoftBank's $9T capex estimates, and Elon Musk's Colossus data center. Co-host Aman Kabeer contributes complementary figures on Safe Superintelligence and Character.AI without conflict. | |
| Public Market Multiples, Nvidia/Palantir Valuations, and the AI Hardware IPO Wave | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Matt details Nvidia's financial multiples relative to market averages and analyzes the Cerebras S-1 filing. Aman adds market context around Palantir's multiple and G42 CFIUS regulatory issues. | |
| Private Market AI Valuations vs. Actual Revenue Scale | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Aman introduces Sierra's 225x ARR multiple and internal portfolio data showing $40B in market value across pre-scale startups. Matt analyzes the stark contrast between public SaaS median multiples (5-6x) and pre-revenue AI valuations, describing the split reality VCs face daily. | |
| Debating the AI Bubble: The Case FOR a Bubble and Spending Imbalances | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Matt details the case for an AI bubble, referencing David Kahn's $600B revenue gap paper, Goldman Sachs reports, hardware timeline risks, and scaling laws. He also shares direct insights from a personal conversation with Sam Altman at OpenAI. | |
| The Case AGAINST the AI Bubble: Hypergrowth, Massive Demand, and Technical Breakthroughs | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Matt outlines counterarguments to the bubble thesis using Big Tech earnings data, model reasoning breakthroughs (o1), and 90% token price declines. Aman provides context on Stripe startup acceleration metrics and highlights community skepticism regarding Google's AI code generation metrics. | |
| Does an AI Bubble Matter? The Dot-Com Analogy | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Matt frames the AI spending boom using the dot-com era analogy, arguing VCs must play on the field despite risk of busts to catch generational winners like Amazon or Google. He highlights disagreement among AI luminaries (LeCun, Fei-Fei Li) on defining AGI versus ASI. | |
| Pragmatic AI Deployment vs. The Fade of AI Doomerism | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Matt points out the rapid dissipation of 2023 AI doomerism as focus pivots toward enterprise deployment realities. Both speakers agree that procurement and compliance are the real friction points rather than existential risk. | |
| The AI Stack: Infrastructure & Frontier Model Competition | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Matt maps out FirstMark's venture framework across the AI stack, explaining why they pass on compute and frontier foundation model rounds due to fund sizing and lack of durable differentiation. He notes competitive pressures from open-source models like Meta's Llama. | |
| Investing in Specialized Models: Modalities & Automation | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Matt shares historical venture lessons from early investments in Dataiku, breaking down current dynamics in LLM evaluation and open-source agent frameworks. He provides a sharp analysis of specialized vector database risks as incumbent general-purpose databases add vector search. | |
| Consumer AI Applications & The Billionaire Test | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Matt contrasts previous mobile paradigm shifts with AI-native consumer apps, citing Suno AI as a novel model. He expands on Richard Socher's 'Billionaire Test' mental model to predict consumer software opportunities in AI tutoring and personal assistants. | |
| Enterprise AI Reality: Secret Cyborgs, Consultants & Data Readiness | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Aman shares FirstMark CTO Guild data showing 62% of AI adopters felt underwhelmed by initial impact. Matt expands on this with US Census data to illustrate 'secret cyborg' shadow usage by employees versus corporate adoption delays, low-hanging fruit deployment, and massive IT consulting revenue. | |
| The Reinvention of SaaS, Outcome-Based Pricing & Agent Networks | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Matt explicitly refutes the premise that AI means the 'death of SaaS', explaining the transition from database wrappers to intelligence wrappers. He illustrates the shift toward outcome-based pricing using portfolio company Ada as a concrete case study. |