The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Weinberg: Harvey abandoned a $700M acquisition after securing $500M equity
“The idea was basically we were gonna buy this company that ended up, it was 10 times bigger than us, people-wise and about the same, like, we were gonna, trying to buy the company For the same, a little bit higher valuation than we are valued at. We tried to b…”
Weinberg: Ignore smooth-running parts of company and focus solely on burning bottlenecks
“Like if there is a part of the company that is running super well and there are no bottlenecks, I ignore it entirely, like absolutely entirely. And I try to only focus on the things that are like burning. And I try to focus on like the number one thing that's …”
Harvey raised its initial funding directly from OpenAI, bypassing traditional VCs
“We didn't go to any other VCs or anything like that.”
Weinberg: Harvey missed product launches after miscommunicating a five-year vision doc
“Remember in like Q three of last year, I wrote this like long doc and it was like the vision for the product for like five years or whatever, a long time. And I think it was interpreted as like, okay, we should go build that right now is a huge mistake. And we…”