why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Opinion
Immelt: Washington Mutual's collapse was worse for 2008 than Lehman's
“Most people think about the day Lehman Brothers went bankrupt as the worst day in the financial crisis, but it actually was the day Washington Mutual went bankrupt, which was like two weeks later on a Friday because all the bondholders got wiped out.”
Insight
McChrystal: Appointing a Chief Risk Officer Creates Organizational Moral Hazard
“There's a moral hazard here in that organizations like Lehman Brothers, who named a very capable chief risk officer Created an impression inside the organization that other individuals didn't have to worry as much about risk because they had a person who was r…”
Assertion Supported
McChrystal: Lehman Brothers Excluded Its Chief Risk Officer From Investment Meetings
“And she wasn't allowed in things like an investment committee meetings where the biggest risk decisions were made.”
Assertion Partly supported
Schwarzman: Lehman's 1984 sale was triggered by trading limit breaches and rate losses
“People in the trading department exceeded limits on certain type of security, and it ended up that interest rates went the wrong way, and, you know, we lost doubly on the trade, and the impact of that on a mark-to-market basis would have gotten close to wiping…”
Disclosure
Davis: Davis Advisors held no Bear, Lehman, Fannie, Freddie, or Countrywide in 2008
“If you think of the six horsemen of the apocalypse in the financial crisis, you know, Bear, Lehman, Fannie, Freddie Wamuu, Countrywide you know, we didn't own a share of any of them, and yet here I am running a financial fund, running a fund that probably had …”