Sinduja Rangarajan

Data Storytelling Lead, Jerry · 1 appearance on the record.

computed by AI from the episodes · how this works → · full disclaimer →

journalistscientist@cynduja ↗jerry.ai/author/sinduja-rangarajan ↗

Sinduja Rangarajan is an investigative data journalist and the Data Storytelling Lead at Jerry. Previously a Senior Investigative Data Reporter at Bloomberg News, she was a 2024 Pulitzer Prize finalist for reporting on corporate water profiteering and received an Overseas Press Club award for exposing corporate greenwashing.

4statements → 4claims → 4claims resolved → 100%fully supported → 4/5average certainty → 3/5average debate potential →

4 supported 0 partly supported 0 contradicted how the 4 claims stand · each chip opens the sources

4 assertions · every statement was checked. The predictions and assertions are the 4 claims: statements the public record can support or contradict. 4 are resolved. Everything else (opinions, insights, what ifs, disclosures) can never be settled by the record, so it carries no assessment.

The record, in short

What the tape says about how Sinduja argues and how the claims held up. Everything they said, and everything said about them, is in the tabs below.

Their most notable supported claim

Assertion Supported

Rangarajan: 1,318 Companies Had 112M Metric Ton CO2 Reporting Gap in 2020

“And we found that, you know in, in 2020, A 1318 companies had a difference of hundred and twelve million metric tons CO₂ between their location and their market-based emissions.”

Sinduja Rangarajan Nov 16, 2022 ▶ 2:09 A reality check on corporate sustainability

How they sound: not measured why? →

We measure speaking style by listening to the audio itself, and a fair number needs at least 2,000 words from one person on tape we have measured. There is too little of Sinduja Rangarajan on measured tape to publish a rate. This says nothing about how they speak.

What they said4 Episodes1

Everything Sinduja Rangarajan said on the Green Blueprint that made the record, most notable first. Filter by type, assessment or year in the ledger →

Assertion Supported

Rangarajan: 1,318 Companies Had 112M Metric Ton CO2 Reporting Gap in 2020

“And we found that, you know in, in 2020, A 1318 companies had a difference of hundred and twelve million metric tons CO₂ between their location and their market-based emissions.”

Sinduja Rangarajan Nov 16, 2022 ▶ 2:09 A reality check on corporate sustainability

Assertion Supported

Rangarajan: Without RECs, Procter & Gamble's emissions drop was only 12%

“So, you know, we looked at so many companies, and, you know, for example, Procter & Gamble, you know, decided to claim that, you know, it slashed 50% of its emissions and then when you really look at, you know, how they got to that 50% reduction, then a lot of…”

Sinduja Rangarajan Nov 16, 2022 ▶ 6:26 A reality check on corporate sustainability

Assertion Supported

Rangarajan: Without RECs, Cisco's emissions rose 22% instead of dropping 60%

“With Cisco, again, you know emissions reductions, and claims using a certain form of accounting would be 60%, but then when you actually remove the credits from the equation, then their emissions have actually gone up by 22%.”

Sinduja Rangarajan Nov 16, 2022 ▶ 6:53 A reality check on corporate sustainability

Assertion Supported

Rangarajan: Intel's emissions rose 38% without renewable energy credits

“Another example that comes to mind is Intel where, you know, their emissions have actually gone up by 38%, but when you, like, calculate Using renewable energy credits, then it only goes up by, like, 17%.”

Sinduja Rangarajan Nov 16, 2022 ▶ 7:10 A reality check on corporate sustainability

Appearances (1)

Episode	Date	Speaking time
A reality check on corporate sustainability	Nov 16, 2022	4m

Sinduja Rangarajan

The record, in short

Their most notable supported claim

How they sound: not measured why? →

Appearances (1)

Turn any episode into a week of clips.