Q matter? And of course, they matter for the planet. Like, we should all be thinking about the, the, the emissions of, of, from, from producing products. But are companies actually demanding low embodied emissions products along the supply chain? And where does the policy component come in? Like, you know, if I think about Europe's carbon border adjustment tax, why could that potentially influence investments in Lower embodied emissions products.
A Solar and clean energy should really lead on this, right? It doesn't make sense if we're, you know, it doesn't make sense for a fitness instructor to be like, well, I teach other people how to be healthy, but I do and eat whatever I want, right? So, you know, as the clean energy industry, we should also be, you know, we should also be leading on this front. But beyond that, I mean, you know, if that's not convincing enough, um, there are Reasons why this is becoming important. You know, first of all, a lot of the end users are starting to look more and more into scope three emissions, and as they set their carbon reduction targets, their net zero carbon targets, um, you know, the embodied carbon in their supply chain, um, matters more and more and more. So, uh, you know, if that goes for folks that, you know, are Uh, you know, whether they're buying the modules themselves or they're buying the electricity generated from, you know, a solar power plant, the, uh, carbon intensity of actually producing that solar energy also matters. I think, secondly, that you're seeing, um, it as a way for folks either to address their trade or carbon priorities as well as looking at the carbon intensity of supply chains. So, for example, right now, Um, the EU has a carbon border adjustment mechanism in place, so for key industries, they are actually looking at the, you know, embedded carbon of t…
AI assessment note: “a lot of the end users are starting to look more and more into scope three”