The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Joel Makower no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q followed closely to get a read on how corporate sustainability is playing out. He's the chairman and co-founder of the Green Biz Group, and I caught up with him at Green Biz's Verge conference recently. I wanted to get his read on what all this activity adds up to, because it certainly feels different, but Is it actually different? Joel doesn't think we're at a stage of radical transformation yet.

A Well, I think it is important, but I also think it's still relatively few and far between that, you know, yes, Microsoft, yes, Amazon, yes, Walmart, you know, yes, uh, you know, a handful of other companies, mostly in the tech field, but it's the same old company, Stephen. It's the same ones we talk about, but in the rest of the corporate world, it's still radical incrementalism. You know, just a lot of small ball kinds of things that companies are doing that, that You know, are necessary, but highly insufficient, and do not roll up to the, to the magnitude of the moment, and that's the challenge, is that, yes, there, you know, and, and, and look, I've been in this field for over 30 years, and, and every, every year, certainly every few years, you can say there's, there's, there's some new things, you know, circular economy, ESG, and sustainability, carbon removal, just on and on and on, and, and yet, so many of these events, and so many of these conversations, is February second, it Groundhog Day all over again. And so, that's the challenge, that's the frustrating part. Um, most days a glass half old kind of guy, but frankly, I think the glass is just way too small.

AI assessment note: “in the rest of the corporate world, it's still radical incrementalism”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 4.15

Q Why is that? What are the forces inside companies that are contributing to that incrementalism?

A In a word, change. You know, change, you know, we all love the noun, but hate the verb. You know, we like the idea of change, we need to change, you know, things need to change, we need to change the system, we need to change the way the system. Changing itself, the verb, is actually hard to do, really hard to do, and there's a lot of resistance to that. And inside companies, you've, you know, it used to be back, you know, in the day, it was like, get CEO buy-in, you know, and well, CEOs say, I'm in. I, this, we need to do this stuff. And, and the young recruits, they want this stuff. It's that big, fat, impenetrable wad of, of resistance called middle management that's often thwarted. They're really adept at thwarting change. And so, You know, and some of that's, you know, C-suite led to, they're, they're, they're making these commitments, but they're not really equipping, you know, the people to, to, and supporting them to make the kinds of changes they need to know, to need to make. But I think an even bigger issue is that it's still, when it all even happens, it's still not enough. And, you know, we really, uh, need to transform our economy. We need to transform how we make and do things. We need to transform the business model. We need to transform the consumption habits. You know, we need to change everything, and that's an extraordinarily exciting opportunity, but it mea…

AI assessment note: “impenetrable wad of, of resistance called middle management that's often thwarted.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.