The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Christian Shepard no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q the different measures that China is taking, and there's this page here with all these fancy icons that, that outlines many of the measures that you referenced. Um, they're talking about building the greenest ice, making the games carbon neutral, which is a very squishy term, promoting wildlife conservation in competition zones, There's a long list here. Who's actually tracking whether these things are being implemented and making an impact?

A Well, the short answer is China, and not really anyone else. Um, and this is one of the big problems that people who are looking at overall Olympic sustainability, they raise that the IOC doesn't have the tools in place to check up on whether or not the, uh, Olympics hosts are meeting their commitments. There, uh, haven't really been independent checks carried out in a sort of consistent way. Um, some countries have done, you know, got other groups in to make sure that what they're saying is accurate, but, um, more closed off countries, uh, haven't been willing to, uh, let that level of scrutiny happen. So places like China, really the IOC is just taking the host country at their word. And this is one of the, the big problems that you have around the idea of sustainability in the Olympics. So the people who are in favor of this idea that the Olympics can promote sustainability, they say, well, look at it as a kind of a showcase. It's, it's an exemplar of the best the country can do, and after that, it will help to promote this broader shift. But people on the other side say, look, it's still a mass sporting event. You still have to do a lot of construction. There's gonna be a huge carbon footprint, and more often than not, it's a, a way to kind of spread the idea of being sustainable without actually making it happen in the long run. So it's, you know, the usual concerns around…

AI assessment note: “the short answer is China, and not really anyone else.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.