The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Ben Storrow no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60

Q rooftop solar here, one of the takeaways of your story was we just need better forecasting for distributed generation that often sits behind the meter, on the customer side of the meter, and that's a theme that's consistent across the U.S. So as you talk to experts for this story, what are they telling you about the value of distributed resources and the insufficient ways that we calculate that value?

A I think one of the most interesting things was, I spoke to utility commissioners from Maine and Connecticut for the story, and what they both said is, this is gonna, this study makes it so much, like, we're trying to figure out how to value all these different resources, um, both to solve our reliability challenges and to solve our climate challenges. And this study really helps us place a value on that, um, in a way that maybe we wouldn't have been able to do before. It, it was a reminder to me that we really need to dig in to, to the data and to the facts about how this transition is unfolding, because summer, solar summer reliability, that makes sense. You know, I don't think you have to explain that too, too much in depth. Solar winter reliability? I think that's a little counterintuitive for a lot of people, so, um, I thought that was what was sort of an interesting data point in this wider national conversation that we're having about reliability during the energy transition.

AI assessment note: “we're trying to figure out how to value all these different resources”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.