Supreme Court

7 statements across 3 episodes · 2 bullish · 1 bearish · 3 people on the record · first statement Jul 1, 2022 by Nina Farah · across every show →

Everything said about Supreme Court, oldest first

Jul 1, 2022 neutral
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Supreme Court kept major questions scope consistent with FDA and CDC precedents
“That interpretation is very similar to what we saw with other recent cases. So can FDA regulate tobacco, or can CDC, for example, issue an eviction moratorium? And so we aren't seeing the court come out and broaden the scope of how it's looking at major questi…”
Nina Farah Jul 1, 2022 ▶ 14:42 How bad is the Supreme Court’s decision on climate?
Jul 1, 2022 neutral
Assertion Supported
The Supreme Court invoked the major questions doctrine against the EPA
“So, what the Supreme Court said was that EPA had acted outside its authority under the Clean Air Act, To use generation shifting, which is shifting from fossil fuel based energy sources to renewable energy sources as sort of the foundation of its regulatory ap…”
Nina Farah Jul 1, 2022 ▶ 7:09 How bad is the Supreme Court’s decision on climate?
Jul 1, 2022 negative
Opinion
Supreme Court's climate ruling is 'bad to pretty bad,' not disastrous
“I would say bad to pretty bad. I think mainly because it's definitely not the worst for EPA because it has that flexibility still to look at other solutions. It doesn't require only regulations that focus on the power plant itself, so that makes it less bad th…”
Nina Farah Jul 1, 2022 ▶ 13:46 How bad is the Supreme Court’s decision on climate?
Jul 1, 2022 neutral
Opinion
The Supreme Court ruling does not eliminate market-based emissions trading approaches
“Emissions trading is another approach that, you know, power plants can use credits to operate if they're emitting too much and use a marketplace kind of approach. Those kinds of things don't seem like they're off the table from this ruling.”
Nina Farah Jul 1, 2022 ▶ 9:46 How bad is the Supreme Court’s decision on climate?
Jul 1, 2022
Assertion Supported
The West Virginia ruling limits EPA power established in Massachusetts v. EPA
“What the Supreme Court's decision does is limit the power that was recognized to regulate greenhouse gases under that Massachusetts versus EPA decision. That recognized that EPA was required to regulate greenhouse gases.”
Nina Farah Jul 1, 2022 ▶ 12:42 How bad is the Supreme Court’s decision on climate?
Jul 19, 2022 positive
Assertion Not checkable as stated
West Virginia v. EPA leaves EPA authority over power plants, says Ricketts
“The recent West Virginia EPA decision, which certainly curtailed the EPA's authority in certain respects, but also left them Plenty of running room to finalize standards for carbon pollution from both new and existing power plants, and those standards have got…”
Sam Ricketts Jul 19, 2022 ▶ 15:17 Are Biden’s climate ambitions in Congress dead?
Feb 19, 2025 positive
Prediction Open · timeframe Feb 2030
Hamilton: Supreme Court precedent will compel disbursement of obligated IRA funds
“I do think that the funds that are obligated will be dispersed. I'm like, I just don't think that they can legally. The Supreme Court, I don't think, will allow that to happen, so I consider that, like, a lower risk for the funds that have been obligated.”
Katherine Hamilton Feb 19, 2025 ▶ 36:17 Open Circuit: Jigar, Katherine, and Stephen are back
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.