The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Eric Yuppin no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q How do you think about evaluating that as an investment strategy?

A There are three ways looking at some of the Great, great venture capital investors. One area where you've seen great success is entrepreneurs that have built companies and understand what is involved across the multiple fronts. You have to fight, get higher, great Keep them and develop a strategy and marketing, obviously building a product and essentially running at a hundred miles an hour. So there's an entrepreneur is the venture capital category too. You could argue to grown up in a great firm, whether it's Sequoia, one of the world's greatest or the Greylock XL that this, that the training and the exposure to that level of intellect, that level of ferocity, that level of Of thinking about and investing and the flow you get is just an extraordinary experience if you're able to do well on those platforms and it's extremely demanding and hard because the expectations are high. And then the third, Is having the pattern recognition from an investment side, and that's where I think Jamie brings a lot of almost surprising amount of insight, and when you've really seen hundreds and hundreds of companies, and you've seen which have worked well and which haven't, and even having been a Wall Street analyst for 15 years myself, you know, one of those analysts that's always wrong with the quarterly estimates and everything else, that pattern set, that experience set, all the questions A…

AI assessment note: “There are three ways looking at some of the Great, great venture capital investors.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.