The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Ben Cooper no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q I think it might be interesting to start with, just what's your take on long short equity investing?

A That's, that's a good place to start. We definitely see a role for long, short equity investing within our portfolios, but I think the managers that qualify for us are few and far between. We have a real focus on alpha, and we want to see managers able to produce alpha on both the long and the short side, and I think a lot of managers that we come across are very adept, consistent at generating long alpha. But those that can really generate short alpha are really few and far between. And because of the way that we're set up, we can access managers long only, long short, or other strategies. And so it's really alpha that's key. I think when it comes to long short, the other thing that I'd say we're focused on is not all long short is created equally. And so we are looking for managers that maybe operate in a inefficient area or an area that is less well trafficked in and really looking for guys where the environment can be a tailwind rather than a headwind. And so that leads us to managers like Will who operate in between the cracks. Mid smaller cap companies, maybe regions that are less well trafficked in like Japan has been an area where we spent a lot of time. So we think it definitely has a role to play in the portfolio, but it's select opportunities which lend themselves to alpha generation.

AI assessment note: “We definitely see a role for long, short equity investing within our portfolios”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.